【摘要】：本文首先系統(tǒng)闡述了金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的基本理論，，然后根據(jù)金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論提出金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的評(píng)價(jià)依據(jù)，包括金融規(guī)模擴(kuò)張、金融結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化、金融效率提升和金融外部環(huán)境改善四個(gè)方面，在此基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建起金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，并運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)分析方法，從省際、四大區(qū)域和八大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)三個(gè)區(qū)域視角對(duì)2000-2010年間我國(guó)區(qū)域金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的相對(duì)程度進(jìn)行了測(cè)度和比較。并得到如下發(fā)現(xiàn)： 第一，從省際視角進(jìn)行比較發(fā)現(xiàn)，2000-2010年間，我國(guó)31個(gè)省區(qū)的金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的總體進(jìn)展均呈穩(wěn)步上升，金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展相對(duì)程度較高省區(qū)和較低省區(qū)間差距有拉大趨勢(shì)；金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的四個(gè)方面中，金融規(guī)模和金融外部環(huán)境方面呈穩(wěn)步上升，進(jìn)展較快，其它兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)步較小，而且進(jìn)展有起伏。 第二，從四大區(qū)域視角進(jìn)行比較發(fā)現(xiàn)，2000-2010年間，我國(guó)四大區(qū)域的金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的總體進(jìn)展均穩(wěn)步上升，東部地區(qū)與其它地區(qū)間差距有拉大趨勢(shì)；金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的四個(gè)方面中，金融規(guī)模和金融外部環(huán)境的進(jìn)展均穩(wěn)步上升，東部地區(qū)與其它地區(qū)間差距有拉大趨勢(shì)，但在金融結(jié)構(gòu)和金融效率方面的進(jìn)展較小，且各年間有起伏，發(fā)展不夠穩(wěn)定，東部地區(qū)在該兩方面優(yōu)勢(shì)不明顯。 第三，從八大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)視角進(jìn)行比較發(fā)現(xiàn)，2000-2010年間，我國(guó)八大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的總體進(jìn)展均穩(wěn)步上升，但東部沿海地區(qū)、北部沿海地區(qū)、南部沿海地區(qū)、長(zhǎng)江中游地區(qū)四大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平與東北地區(qū)、黃河中游地區(qū)、西南地區(qū)和大西北地區(qū)四大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的差距有拉大趨勢(shì)。金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的四個(gè)方面中，金融規(guī)模和金融外部環(huán)境的進(jìn)展均穩(wěn)步上升，金融結(jié)構(gòu)和金融效率方面進(jìn)展緩慢，且各年間有波動(dòng)，發(fā)展穩(wěn)定性不夠，而且經(jīng)濟(jì)較為發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)優(yōu)勢(shì)不夠明顯。 根據(jù)實(shí)證研究的結(jié)果，本文認(rèn)為，由于在金融結(jié)構(gòu)和金融效率兩個(gè)方面的進(jìn)展緩慢，提升我國(guó)金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展水平的重點(diǎn)應(yīng)該放在金融結(jié)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化和金融效率的提升上，并提出相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the basic theory of financial sustainable development is systematically expounded, and then the evaluation basis of financial sustainable development is put forward according to the theory of financial sustainable development, including the expansion of financial scale and the optimization of financial structure. Based on the four aspects of financial efficiency improvement and financial external environment improvement, the evaluation index system of financial sustainable development is constructed. This paper measures and compares the relative degree of sustainable development of regional finance in China from 2000 to 2010 from the three regional perspectives of four regions and eight economic zones. The main findings are as follows: first, from the perspective of inter-provincial comparison, we find that the overall progress of financial sustainable development in 31 provinces and regions of China has steadily increased from 2000 to 2010. Among the four aspects of financial sustainable development, the financial scale and the financial external environment have steadily increased, and the progress has been relatively rapid. The other two have made little progress and have made ups and downs. Secondly, from the perspective of four regions, we find that the overall progress of financial sustainable development in the four major regions of our country has steadily increased, and the gap between the eastern region and other regions has a trend of widening, among the four aspects of financial sustainable development, there are four aspects of financial sustainable development. The financial scale and the progress of the external financial environment have steadily increased, and the gap between the eastern region and other regions has tended to widen, but the progress in the financial structure and financial efficiency has been relatively small, and there have been ups and downs over the years, and the development has not been stable enough. Eastern region in these two aspects of the advantage is not obvious. Third, from the angle of view of eight economic zones, we find that the overall progress of financial sustainable development of the eight economic zones in China rose steadily from 2000 to 2010, but the eastern coastal region, the northern coastal region, the southern coastal region, the eastern coastal region, the northern coastal region, the southern coastal region, The financial sustainable development level of the four economic zones in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and the northeast, the middle reaches of the Yellow River, the southwest and the northwest of the Yangtze River has a trend of widening. Among the four aspects of sustainable financial development, progress in financial scale and financial external environment has increased steadily, progress in financial structure and financial efficiency has been slow, and there have been fluctuations over the years, and development has not been stable enough. Moreover, the advantages of the more developed regions are not obvious enough. According to the results of the empirical research, this paper holds that because of the slow progress in the financial structure and financial efficiency, the emphasis of improving the level of financial sustainable development in China should be the optimization of the financial structure and the improvement of the financial efficiency. And put forward the corresponding policy recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黨文;;構(gòu)建我國(guó)農(nóng)村多元金融體系的困境與機(jī)制創(chuàng)新[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年22期

2 徐曉萍;李猛;;我國(guó)三十年來(lái)農(nóng)村地區(qū)金融改革的邏輯軌跡——基于新比較經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2008年05期

3 胡章宏;論金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力的評(píng)價(jià)與建設(shè)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);1997年12期

4 范洪波;國(guó)有商業(yè)銀行體系脆弱性的實(shí)證分析和政策建議[J];金融論壇;2004年07期

5 姚勇;當(dāng)代金融理論何處去:反思與展望──兼評(píng)金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論[J];國(guó)際金融研究;1999年08期

6 周八駿;論金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的一般意義[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2000年07期

7 海明鈞;;構(gòu)建縣域金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展的支持體系探討[J];甘肅金融;2011年06期

8 陳慈洲,毛英煌,雷云斌;金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展問(wèn)題研究[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年05期

9 謝欣,謝元態(tài),許曉東;論我國(guó)農(nóng)村金融的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

10 陸家騮;金融資源積累與金融可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];華南金融研究;2000年04期

本文編號(hào)：2234462