本文選題：雙反”措施　切入點(diǎn)：光伏產(chǎn)品　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：席卷全球的金融危機(jī)以及激烈的國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)使貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義傾向在全球抬頭�！半p反”措施已經(jīng)成為WTO成員國(guó)間常規(guī)化的一種貿(mào)易救濟(jì)工具。光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)作為新能源產(chǎn)業(yè)的代表是各國(guó)爭(zhēng)奪新能源市場(chǎng)份額的戰(zhàn)略制高點(diǎn),近年來(lái)我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)迅速崛起,在國(guó)際市場(chǎng)的占有率也逐步提高。然而,隨著我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,美歐相繼對(duì)我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)實(shí)施貿(mào)易制裁措施,針對(duì)我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)的“雙反”制裁案件數(shù)量逐年攀升。另外,我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)國(guó)外市場(chǎng)依存度高,光伏產(chǎn)品技術(shù)含量低。國(guó)外與國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)的雙重影響導(dǎo)致我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)發(fā)展受阻,面臨著許多的挑戰(zhàn)。為此,本文從“雙反”措施對(duì)出口國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)的理論研究出發(fā),從出口貿(mào)易、產(chǎn)業(yè)環(huán)境、國(guó)家福利三個(gè)層面來(lái)探究“雙反”措施對(duì)出口國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)。同時(shí),分析我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)遭受“雙反”的現(xiàn)狀以及歐美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家及新興市場(chǎng)國(guó)家實(shí)施“雙反”措施的不同特點(diǎn),揭示我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)、優(yōu)勢(shì)與劣勢(shì)、前景與趨勢(shì)。實(shí)證分析中本文首先采用商業(yè)貿(mào)易政策分析系統(tǒng)模型,實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)美國(guó)對(duì)我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)實(shí)施“雙反”措施后產(chǎn)生的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),美國(guó)對(duì)我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)品實(shí)施“雙反”措施具有一定的貿(mào)易抑制效應(yīng)。另外,雖然“雙反”措施的實(shí)施給美國(guó)光伏生產(chǎn)者帶來(lái)了福利,但卻損害了消費(fèi)者的利益,所以從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看美國(guó)社會(huì)總福利是下降的�！半p反”措施并不能從根本上起到貿(mào)易保護(hù)的作用。另外,本文還運(yùn)用2006-2015年的面板數(shù)據(jù),探究影響我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)發(fā)展的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)因素。研究結(jié)果表明,國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值、我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)的出口水平、國(guó)外對(duì)我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)的貿(mào)易調(diào)查和貿(mào)易終裁都是影響我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)發(fā)展的因素,其中貿(mào)易終裁效應(yīng)對(duì)我光伏行業(yè)產(chǎn)能的影響最大,時(shí)間也最持久。最后針對(duì)以上研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,為我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)未來(lái)發(fā)展提出幾點(diǎn)建議。首先應(yīng)建立良好的預(yù)警機(jī)制,爭(zhēng)取將國(guó)外的貿(mào)易制裁遏制在萌芽期,避免“雙反”終裁的最終落實(shí)。其次,當(dāng)貿(mào)易終裁結(jié)果最終公布并落實(shí),以積極的態(tài)度應(yīng)對(duì)貿(mào)易制裁,彌補(bǔ)“雙反”給我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)帶來(lái)的產(chǎn)品滯銷(xiāo),生產(chǎn)停滯,企業(yè)虧損等不良影響,轉(zhuǎn)移“雙反”措施的貿(mào)易抑制效應(yīng)。最后,從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)看我國(guó)光伏行業(yè)應(yīng)努力增強(qiáng)自身實(shí)力,促進(jìn)行業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí),創(chuàng)新整合光伏企業(yè),開(kāi)拓國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng),從根本上避免貿(mào)易制裁的不良影響。
[Abstract]:The global financial crisis and fierce international competition have made the trend of trade protectionism rise all over the world. "double counter" measures have become a conventional trade relief tool among WTO member countries. Photovoltaic industry is a new energy source. The representative of the industry is the strategic commanding point for countries to compete for share of the new energy market. In recent years, China's photovoltaic industry has risen rapidly, and its share in the international market has gradually increased. However, with the development of China's photovoltaic industry, the United States and Europe have successively imposed trade sanctions on China's photovoltaic industry. The number of "double opposition" sanctions against China's photovoltaic industry has increased year by year. In addition, China's photovoltaic industry has a high degree of dependence on foreign markets. The technology content of photovoltaic products is low. The development of photovoltaic industry in our country is hindered by the dual influence of foreign and domestic markets, and it faces many challenges. Therefore, this paper starts from the theoretical study of the economic effect of "double reverse" measures on exporting countries. From three aspects of export trade, industrial environment and national welfare, this paper explores the economic effects of "double counter" measures on exporting countries. This paper analyzes the current situation of the photovoltaic industry in China, and the different characteristics of the measures implemented by the developed countries and emerging market countries in Europe and the United States, and reveals the opportunities and challenges, advantages and disadvantages of the development of the photovoltaic industry in China. In the empirical analysis, we first use the commercial trade policy analysis system model to test the trade effect of the "double reverse" measures in the photovoltaic industry of our country. In addition, although the implementation of the "double reaction" measure has brought benefits to American photovoltaic producers, it has harmed the interests of consumers. So in the long run, overall social welfare in the United States is down. The "double counter" measures do not fundamentally protect trade. In addition, this article uses panel data from 2006 to 2015. This paper explores the macroeconomic factors that affect the development of photovoltaic industry in China. The results show that the GDP, the export level of photovoltaic industry in China, The foreign trade investigation and final cut of photovoltaic industry in our country are the factors that affect the development of photovoltaic industry in China, among which the final effect of trade arbitration has the greatest influence on the production capacity of photovoltaic industry in China. The time is also the longest. Finally, in view of the problems found in the above studies, some suggestions are put forward for the future development of the photovoltaic industry in China. First of all, we should establish a good early warning mechanism to try to contain foreign trade sanctions in the bud. Second, when the final results of the final trade cut are finally announced and implemented, and trade sanctions are dealt with in a positive manner, to make up for the unsalable products brought to our photovoltaic industry by "double negative", and the stagnation in production. In the long run, China's photovoltaic industry should strive to enhance its own strength, promote industry transformation and upgrading, innovate and integrate photovoltaic enterprises, and open up the domestic market. Fundamentally avoid the adverse effects of trade sanctions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F426.61;F741

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張祥;王經(jīng)亞;周敏;;光伏企業(yè)縱向一體化的水平測(cè)度及對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效的影響[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年08期

2 馬慶強(qiáng);;我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題及國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年04期

3 顏蘇莉;孫婧豪;;我國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、存在問(wèn)題及解決之道[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

4 陳斯琴;劉旭東;長(zhǎng)青;;新形勢(shì)下中國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展路徑研究[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2016年01期

5 余東華;呂逸楠;;政府不當(dāng)干預(yù)與戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)產(chǎn)能過(guò)�！灾袊�(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)為例[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年10期

6 陳芬;;中國(guó)光伏業(yè)需領(lǐng)跑者[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;2015年15期

7 何憲民;;美國(guó)“雙反”措施對(duì)中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品影響探析[J];理論視野;2015年03期

8 石紅蓮;朱亞靜;;美對(duì)華光伏“雙反”影響探析——基于兩次“雙反”案例[J];中國(guó)商貿(mào);2015年04期

9 胡越;陳麗珍;;我國(guó)光伏出口受歐美“雙反”的影響研究[J];中國(guó)集體經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年01期

10 宏結(jié);何平;;中國(guó)對(duì)美實(shí)施“雙反”措施的產(chǎn)業(yè)救濟(jì)效應(yīng)研究——基于取向電工鋼“雙反”案的COMPAS模型分析[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李媛;歐盟對(duì)華光伏產(chǎn)品“雙反”的原因與影響分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 武守媛;歐盟對(duì)華“雙反”的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2014年

3 姬海臣;歐美對(duì)我國(guó)光伏“雙反”的研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1688890