【摘要】：在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)成為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要途徑,技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)逐漸成為專利技術(shù)保護(hù)和企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的關(guān)鍵。全球范圍內(nèi)的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日益激烈,擁有世界公認(rèn)的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)意味著巨大的市場(chǎng)和經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。因此,發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家都在加大標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化戰(zhàn)略的制定和研究,如歐盟擁有的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)就有10萬(wàn)多個(gè),日本擁有的工業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有8200多個(gè)。很多專家學(xué)者和企業(yè)開始對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)展開相關(guān)研究和實(shí)踐。人們發(fā)現(xiàn)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不僅依靠企業(yè)龐大的技術(shù)實(shí)力和經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力,而且越來(lái)越多的企業(yè)依靠戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的壟斷。然而,技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟能否建立,與用戶安裝基礎(chǔ)、轉(zhuǎn)換成本、網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)、技術(shù)水平等因素有密切關(guān)系。因此,企業(yè)必須在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的決策過程中考慮市場(chǎng)容量、自身能力和對(duì)方優(yōu)勢(shì)等問題。目前的研究多集中在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的形成原因角度,側(cè)重影響因素的定性分析層面,從定量角度研究技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟影響因素的研究文獻(xiàn)很少�；诖�,本文從以下幾個(gè)方面展開研究。首先,闡述了相關(guān)研究背景及意義,提出了企業(yè)在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟決策過程中面對(duì)的聯(lián)盟方式、影響因素等問題,描述了本文的研究思路和研究?jī)?nèi)容,對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述進(jìn)行了述評(píng)。其次,考慮了在橫向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)型技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的情況下,廠商采取技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟策略的影響因素。本文創(chuàng)新性地提出技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差距對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟策略的影響,通過對(duì)用戶安裝基礎(chǔ)和市場(chǎng)容量作用的定量分析,得出相應(yīng)的最優(yōu)策略。第三,考慮了在縱向合作型技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的情況下,供應(yīng)商采取加入已有聯(lián)盟的方式,引入利潤(rùn)分享契約,探討利潤(rùn)分配比例及折扣價(jià)格對(duì)聯(lián)盟的影響,并依據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)洞理論進(jìn)行聯(lián)盟契約簽訂的調(diào)整,根據(jù)不同情況分析最優(yōu)的聯(lián)盟方式。最后,通過合作博弈的理論,根據(jù)不同的市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)選擇不同的合作博弈方法。最后通過比較不同市場(chǎng)環(huán)境下的技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟策略得出結(jié)論。本文的研究為技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟策略提供了具有現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)意義的結(jié)論。不但豐富了技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟的應(yīng)用范圍,也為技術(shù)創(chuàng)新管理的研究提供了可借鑒的成果。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, technological innovation and intellectual property rights have become an important way of economic development, and technical standards have gradually become the key to the protection of patented technology and the competitive advantage of enterprises. The competition of technical standards in the world is becoming more and more fierce, and owning the recognized technical standards in the world means great market and economic interests. Therefore, developed countries are increasing the formulation and research of standardization strategy, such as the European Union has more than 100000 technical standards, Japan has more than 8200 industrial standards. Many experts, scholars and enterprises began to carry out relevant research and practice on technical standards. It is found that technical standards not only rely on the huge technical strength and economic strength of enterprises, but also rely on strategic alliance to realize the monopoly of technical standards. However, whether the technical standard alliance can be established is closely related to the user installation foundation, conversion cost, network structure, technical level and so on. Therefore, enterprises must consider market capacity, their own ability and each other's advantages in the decision-making process of technical standards alliance. At present, most of the research focuses on the causes of the formation of the technical standard alliance, focusing on the qualitative analysis of the influencing factors, and the research literature on the influencing factors of the technical standard alliance from the quantitative point of view is very few. Based on this, this paper studies from the following aspects. First of all, this paper expounds the relevant research background and significance, puts forward the alliance mode and influencing factors faced by enterprises in the decision-making process of technical standard alliance, and describes the research ideas and contents of this paper. The literature review of Technical Standards Alliance is reviewed. Secondly, the influencing factors of adopting technical standard alliance strategy are considered in the case of horizontal competitive technical standard alliance. This paper innovatively puts forward the influence of technical standard gap on technical standard alliance strategy, and obtains the corresponding optimal strategy through the quantitative analysis of user installation basis and market capacity. Thirdly, in the case of vertical cooperative technical standards alliance, suppliers adopt the way of joining the existing alliance, introduce profit-sharing contract, and explore the influence of profit distribution ratio and discount price on the alliance. According to the theory of structural hole, the alliance contract is adjusted, and the optimal alliance mode is analyzed according to different conditions. Finally, through the theory of cooperative game, different cooperative game methods are selected according to different market structure. Finally, the conclusion is drawn by comparing the technical standard alliance strategy in different market environments. The research in this paper provides a practical guiding conclusion for the technical standard alliance strategy. It not only enriches the application scope of technical standards alliance, but also provides a reference for the research of technological innovation management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F273.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王金玉;;論我國(guó)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施[J];中國(guó)計(jì)量學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

2 沈君;王續(xù)琨;;從技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究走向技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)學(xué)[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2014年02期

3 陳銳;周永根;沈華;徐浩然;;技術(shù)變革與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)協(xié)同發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2013年07期

4 張米爾;國(guó)偉;紀(jì)勇;;技術(shù)專利與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相互作用的實(shí)證研究[J];科研管理;2013年04期

5 趙道致;韓敬穩(wěn);秦娟娟;;基于轉(zhuǎn)換成本的供應(yīng)鏈成員討價(jià)還價(jià)能力研究[J];中國(guó)管理科學(xué);2010年04期

6 魯其輝;朱道立;;質(zhì)量與價(jià)格競(jìng)爭(zhēng)供應(yīng)鏈的均衡與協(xié)調(diào)策略研究[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

7 范德成;唐小旭;;區(qū)域產(chǎn)學(xué)研結(jié)合技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的知識(shí)管理研究[J];軟科學(xué);2008年12期

8 宋樂偉;;降低技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移成本——一個(gè)東西部技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的模型解釋[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2008年05期

9 龍勇;余濤;;高新技術(shù)企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟動(dòng)機(jī)及聯(lián)盟形態(tài)研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2008年04期

10 張利飛;曾德明;李大平;張運(yùn)生;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟治理的本質(zhì)分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2007年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳文華;高技術(shù)企業(yè)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)聯(lián)盟治理研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年

2 孫耀吾;基于技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的高技術(shù)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2485243