【摘要】：氣化變化引發(fā)的危機已經(jīng)嚴重影響到人類的生存和發(fā)展,低碳技術的使用是應對這一危機的最主要手段。發(fā)達國家經(jīng)過兩百多年的工業(yè)化發(fā)展,積累了相當量的財富和技術,利用最先進的低碳技術控制了本國二氧化碳的排放量,而發(fā)展中國家在其工業(yè)化過程中,由于缺乏資金和技術,仍然處于粗放式生產(chǎn)階段,排放了大量的二氧化碳。但是空氣是流動的,氣候變化引發(fā)的災難沒有哪一個國家能夠幸免。在此背景之下,低碳技術從發(fā)達國家向發(fā)展中國家轉(zhuǎn)移是大勢所趨。但是目前低碳技術的轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)狀并不令人滿意。影響低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)移的因素有很多,高額關稅、投資風險、高利潤比等等,而知識產(chǎn)權保護制度則一直是是發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家爭論的焦點。雙方均認為知識產(chǎn)權制度阻礙了低碳技術的轉(zhuǎn)移,只是發(fā)達國家認為發(fā)展中國家知識產(chǎn)權制度不夠完善,導致企業(yè)不愿意進行技術轉(zhuǎn)移;發(fā)展中國家則認為是世界范圍內(nèi)知識產(chǎn)權保護急劇擴張導致大型企業(yè)享有絕對的壟斷優(yōu)勢,使發(fā)展中國家企業(yè)無法在市場機制下獲得低碳技術。因此,我們需要探究的是低碳技術與知識產(chǎn)權保護之間的關系究竟如何、產(chǎn)生“阻礙”的本質(zhì)原因是什么、現(xiàn)有的解決這種沖突的理論和機制不能有效發(fā)揮作用的原因是什么。本文主要采用理論分析的方法,將全文分為六個部分對問題進行闡述、分析。第一章簡要介紹本文的研究背景與意義、研究現(xiàn)狀和研究內(nèi)容與方法。第二章對低碳技術的特點和轉(zhuǎn)移模式進行介紹,重點闡述低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)移的必要性。第三章探究低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)移與知識產(chǎn)權保護之間的關系,產(chǎn)生沖突的本質(zhì)原因,并對沖突的表現(xiàn)進行了介紹。第四章主要介紹為了解決低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)移與知識產(chǎn)權保護的沖突、促進技術轉(zhuǎn)移,所引入的理論建議和國際公約規(guī)定的機制。第五章解決低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)移與知識產(chǎn)權保護沖突的基本原則和具體措施建議。第六章對全文進行總結。
[Abstract]:The crisis caused by gasification has seriously affected the survival and development of human beings. The use of low-carbon technology is the most important means to deal with this crisis. After more than 200 years of industrial development, developed countries have accumulated equivalent wealth and technology, using state-of-the-art low-carbon technologies to control their carbon dioxide emissions, while developing countries in the course of their industrialization, Due to lack of funds and technology, it is still in the extensive production stage, emitting a large amount of carbon dioxide. But the air is flowing, and no country can survive the disaster caused by climate change. In this context, the transfer of low-carbon technology from developed countries to developing countries is the general trend. But the current low-carbon technology transfer status is not satisfactory. There are many factors affecting the transfer of low-carbon technology, such as high tariffs, investment risk, high profit ratio, and so on. The intellectual property protection system has always been the focus of debate between developed and developing countries. Both sides believe that the intellectual property system hinders the transfer of low-carbon technology, but the developed countries believe that the intellectual property system in developing countries is not perfect, which leads to the reluctance of enterprises to transfer technology; Developing countries believe that the rapid expansion of intellectual property protection in the world has led to the absolute monopoly advantage of large enterprises, which makes developing countries unable to obtain low-carbon technology under the market mechanism. Therefore, what we need to explore is how the relationship between low-carbon technology and intellectual property protection is, what is the essential cause of "hindrance", and what is the reason why the existing theories and mechanisms to resolve this kind of conflict cannot play an effective role. This article mainly uses the theoretical analysis method, divides the full text into six parts to carry on the elaboration and the analysis to the question. The first chapter briefly introduces the research background and significance, research status, research contents and methods. The second chapter introduces the characteristics and transfer mode of low-carbon technology, focusing on the necessity of low-carbon technology transfer. The third chapter explores the relationship between low-carbon technology transfer and intellectual property protection, the essential cause of conflict, and introduces the performance of conflict. The fourth chapter mainly introduces the theoretical suggestions and mechanisms stipulated in international conventions in order to solve the conflict between low-carbon technology transfer and intellectual property protection and to promote technology transfer. Chapter five: the basic principles and specific measures to solve the conflict between low-carbon technology transfer and intellectual property protection. The sixth chapter summarizes the full text.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 丁道勤;楊曉嬌;;標準化中的專利挾持問題研究[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2011年04期

2 萬志前;鄭友德;;知識產(chǎn)權制度生態(tài)化重構初探[J];法學評論;2010年01期

3 馬蓉蓉;;基于低碳技術創(chuàng)新的專利制度安排[J];開放導報;2011年02期

4 郭麗峰;高志前;;專利池的形成機理及對我國的啟示[J];中國科技產(chǎn)業(yè);2006年04期

5 張鵬;;論低碳技術創(chuàng)新的知識產(chǎn)權制度回應[J];科技與法律;2010年03期

6 王勝利;;專利池:是藩籬,更是利劍[J];科學決策;2008年04期

7 袁曉東;李曉桃;;專利池的治理結構分析[J];科學學與科學技術管理;2009年08期

8 劉雪鳳;鄭友德;蔡祖國;;我國新能源技術知識產(chǎn)權戰(zhàn)略的構建[J];科學學與科學技術管理;2011年10期

9 張濤;胡耀輝;;我國企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權管理體系構建研究[J];企業(yè)活力;2006年08期

10 王德祿;;以企業(yè)為主體的產(chǎn)學研——組織模式創(chuàng)新的思考[J];新材料產(chǎn)業(yè);2007年09期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 周鄭麗;論權利沖突[D];重慶大學;2006年

2 李淑娟;國際低碳技術轉(zhuǎn)讓法律問題研究[D];南昌大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2466454