【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一種專有權(quán)利，具有壟斷的合法性，但是如果權(quán)利人在壟斷的過程中不適當(dāng)?shù)男惺箼?quán)利，就會造成知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用會擾亂健康的市場競爭秩序，破壞公平的市場競爭環(huán)境，所以必須嚴(yán)格規(guī)范知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為。我國用以規(guī)范權(quán)利人濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為的反壟斷法尚處于萌芽狀態(tài)，其他用以規(guī)制這一問題的法律也大多具有內(nèi)容不系統(tǒng)，實行力度較弱等問題。因此，對我國用反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的研究就顯得尤為必要。本文主要通過四部分內(nèi)容對這一問題進(jìn)行闡述： 第一章，著眼于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的壟斷，進(jìn)而引出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題，概括知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的含義、具體表現(xiàn)及反壟斷法與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用之間的關(guān)系。 第二章，，討論了發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷規(guī)制歷程，并對此進(jìn)行概括總結(jié)，得出對我國用反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗。 第三章，對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，指出存在的缺陷和不足。 第四章，建議我國分別從立法、執(zhí)法、司法、理念等四個層面完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷規(guī)制：一是構(gòu)建完善的立法體系；二是設(shè)立專門的執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)；三是增加知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的刑事責(zé)任制度；四是增強(qiáng)反壟斷意識。
[Abstract]:As a kind of exclusive right, intellectual property has the legitimacy of monopoly, but if the right holder does not exercise the right properly in the process of monopoly, it will cause the abuse of intellectual property. The abuse of intellectual property rights will disturb the healthy market competition order and destroy the fair market competition environment, so we must strictly regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights. In China, the anti-monopoly law used to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights is still in its infancy, and most of the other laws used to regulate this issue have some problems, such as unsystematic content and weak enforcement. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the abuse of intellectual property by anti-monopoly law in China. This paper mainly discusses this problem through four parts: the first chapter focuses on the monopoly of intellectual property, and then leads to the problem of abuse of intellectual property, and generalizes the meaning of abuse of intellectual property. The concrete manifestation and the relation between the anti-monopoly law and the abuse of intellectual property. The second chapter discusses the course of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in developed countries and regions, and summarizes it, and draws the advanced experience of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law in China. The third chapter analyzes the current situation of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in China and points out the defects and shortcomings. In the fourth chapter, it is suggested that our country should perfect the anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse from four aspects of legislation, law enforcement, judicature and concept: one is to construct a perfect legislative system, the other is to set up a special law enforcement agency. Third, increase the criminal liability system of intellectual property abuse; fourth, enhance anti-monopoly consciousness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 伍靜;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷與反壟斷立法分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年05期

2 沈木珠,解薇薇;中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷立法思考——從中國企業(yè)面臨的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)危機(jī)談起[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

3 寧立志;論反壟斷法對專利權(quán)行使的規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年01期

4 王先林;;從微軟壟斷案看知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)家;2001年03期

5 張偉君;單曉光;;WTO框架下完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用規(guī)制制度的若干思考[J];法學(xué)家;2008年02期

6 王先林;略論競爭法對跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制[J];中國工商管理研究;2005年04期

7 朱淑娣;;中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷限制規(guī)范比較研究——兼議國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)博弈中的合法利益爭取[J];中國工商管理研究;2009年10期

8 王先林;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制問題論綱[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論壇;2004年00期

9 張瑞萍;反壟斷法應(yīng)如何對待知識產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年04期

10 朱慈蘊(yùn);反思反壟斷:我國應(yīng)當(dāng)建立溫和型的反壟斷制度[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

本文編號：2420636