【摘要】：隨著海峽兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)朝著一體化方向邁進(jìn),海峽兩岸專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作機制建立的愿望也越來越迫切�！逗{兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議》以及《海峽兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)合作協(xié)議》的相繼簽署,標(biāo)志著海峽兩岸專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作向前邁進(jìn)了一大步。但是,時至今日《海峽兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)合作協(xié)議》提出的建立海峽兩岸專利審查合作機制仍然沒有實質(zhì)性進(jìn)展。國外區(qū)域?qū)＠麢?quán)保護(hù)合作的實踐表明專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作不能僅局限于專利審查合作,應(yīng)當(dāng)朝著專利制度一體化方向邁進(jìn)。因此,有必要循序漸進(jìn)的推進(jìn)海峽兩岸專利權(quán)保護(hù)的一體化。 本文分四大部分進(jìn)行闡述： 第一部分主要闡述海峽兩岸專利制度的歷史沿革和現(xiàn)行專利制度的比較。海峽兩岸專利制度一脈相承,根源相同的事實使得兩岸現(xiàn)行專利制度大同小異。兩岸專利制度差異性主要表現(xiàn)在不授予專利權(quán)客體范圍、專利權(quán)保護(hù)期限、專利標(biāo)識、專利審查、專利侵權(quán)救濟(jì)等方面。 第二部分主要分析《海峽兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)合作協(xié)議》的法律性質(zhì)并對協(xié)議涉及的專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作內(nèi)容進(jìn)行闡述�！逗{兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)合作協(xié)議》是世界貿(mào)易組織框架下區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)議,主體是中國兩個不同關(guān)稅區(qū)政府。協(xié)議最受矚目之處在于確認(rèn)了兩岸優(yōu)先權(quán)。同時協(xié)議還提出海峽兩岸專利審查合作機制的建立。 第三部分通過對《專利合作條約》模式、專利審查高速公路模式、歐洲專利模式以及歐洲單一專利制度模式等國外區(qū)域?qū)＠麢?quán)保護(hù)合作機制的分析,提出對海峽兩岸建立專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作機制的借鑒意義。 第四部分主要闡述了應(yīng)當(dāng)如何循序漸進(jìn)、逐步推進(jìn)我國海峽兩岸專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作機制的建立。筆者認(rèn)為,兩岸專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作的第一步是落實和完善《海峽兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)合作保護(hù)協(xié)議》中關(guān)于專利權(quán)保護(hù)合作的內(nèi)容,即建立專利審查合作機制。第二步是建立專利授權(quán)統(tǒng)一機制。第三步是制定區(qū)域統(tǒng)一專利法律制度。
[Abstract]:As the cross-strait economy moves towards integration, The desire to establish a mechanism for the protection and cooperation of patent rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is becoming more and more urgent. The signing of the Framework Agreement on Economic Cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and the Agreement on the Protection and Cooperation of intellectual property Rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, Marks the two sides of the Taiwan Strait patent protection cooperation forward a big step forward. However, there is still no substantial progress in establishing the mechanism of patent examination and cooperation between the two sides of the strait as proposed in the Agreement on the Protection and Cooperation of intellectual property Rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The practice of foreign regional patent protection cooperation shows that patent protection cooperation should not only be limited to patent examination cooperation, but should move towards the integration of patent system. Therefore, it is necessary to step by step to promote the integration of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait patent protection. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly expounds the history of cross-strait patent system and the comparison of current patent system. The fact that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have the same origin makes the current patent system of the two sides of the strait much the same. The differences between the two sides of the patent system are mainly manifested in the object scope of non-grant of patent right, patent protection period, patent mark, patent examination, patent infringement relief and so on. The second part mainly analyzes the legal nature of the Agreement on the Protection and Cooperation of intellectual property Rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and expounds the content of patent protection and cooperation involved in the Agreement. The Agreement on the Protection and Cooperation of intellectual property Rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is a world trade. RTAs in the framework of easy organization, The main body is the government of two different tariff zones in China. The most striking aspect of the agreement is that it confirms the priority of the two sides of the strait. At the same time, the agreement also proposed the establishment of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait patent review cooperation mechanism. The third part analyzes the cooperation mechanism of patent protection in foreign countries, such as patent cooperation treaty model, patent review highway model, European patent model and European single patent system model. The paper puts forward the significance of establishing the cooperation mechanism of patent protection between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The fourth part mainly expounds how to step by step and step by step promote the establishment of the cooperation mechanism of patent right protection between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. The author believes that the first step in the cooperation of patent protection between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is to implement and perfect the contents of the Agreement on the Protection of intellectual property Rights between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, that is, to establish a mechanism for patent examination and cooperation. The second step is to establish a unified patent licensing mechanism. The third step is to establish a unified regional patent legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 費艷穎;;“專利權(quán)的地域性”評析[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 宋錫祥;試談臺灣新修正《專利法》[J];福建學(xué)刊;1995年05期

3 唐春;;專利審查一體化制度初探[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年04期

4 劉光華;;海峽兩岸經(jīng)濟(jì)合作框架協(xié)議:從政治議題轉(zhuǎn)換為法律命題[J];海峽法學(xué);2010年02期

5 索光舉;;ECFA的多維法律屬性與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)合作[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年08期

6 鐘立國;;WTO對區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定的規(guī)制及其完善[J];法學(xué)家;2003年04期

7 鄭成思;中國侵權(quán)法理論的誤區(qū)與進(jìn)步──寫在《專利法》再次修訂與《著作權(quán)法》頒布十周年之際[J];中國工商管理研究;2001年02期

8 陳潔;;歐盟增強合作機制的產(chǎn)生、運作與影響[J];德國研究;2013年02期

9 賴文平;;兩岸智慧財產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)合作協(xié)議有關(guān)執(zhí)法協(xié)處機制之探討[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年03期

10 林峻;;2011年國際PCT專利申請態(tài)勢分析[J];科技管理研究;2013年02期

，

本文編號：2370277