【摘要】：隨著知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的腳步聲，國家之間、企業(yè)之間的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛不斷，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)已經(jīng)成為一個熱門話題。民事訴訟是保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)最后的也是最有利的法律手段，熟練掌握知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟的法律知識并靈活運(yùn)用，最大限度的保護(hù)權(quán)利人的正當(dāng)利益。但是，在強(qiáng)化訴訟權(quán)保護(hù)的同時，也應(yīng)注意到類似“專利流氓”、“專利螳螂”的出現(xiàn)，這是一種非法濫用訴權(quán)的現(xiàn)象。 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)具有壟斷性和排他性，惡意訴訟行為人就是利用這種特性，以保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為名義，擠兌競爭對手，使得對方不僅商譽(yù)受損，同時可能失掉寶貴的商業(yè)機(jī)會和市場，造成精神和物質(zhì)上的雙重?fù)p失等。應(yīng)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)的惡意訴訟行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制，否則將損害相對人的合法權(quán)益，阻礙我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略的實(shí)施，浪費(fèi)有限的司法資源。 我國現(xiàn)行法律中，只有個別條文涉及知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟的規(guī)制，從總體來說仍較為淺顯、分散，沒有形成體系，也沒有對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟進(jìn)行識別及程序上的規(guī)制。 本文結(jié)合新《民事訴訟法》與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法的特殊規(guī)定，以程序法為角度，重點(diǎn)研究如何從程序法中完善相關(guān)的制度，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域惡意訴訟行為進(jìn)行有效規(guī)制。本文主要包括以下四部分內(nèi)容： 第一部分，從學(xué)術(shù)爭議、含義和特征對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的惡意訴訟行為進(jìn)行界定，并結(jié)合我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略等分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域惡意訴訟程序法規(guī)制的意義； 第二部分，在對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域惡意訴訟行為進(jìn)行程序法規(guī)制前，結(jié)合侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的四個構(gòu)成要件對惡意訴訟行為進(jìn)行識別。并歸納司法實(shí)踐中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域惡意訴訟的常見類型，以期有利于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟的實(shí)踐應(yīng)用； 第三部分，，結(jié)合我國新《民事訴訟法》及知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法的特殊規(guī)定，從訴前禁令抗辯、專業(yè)技術(shù)的審查判斷、事后的救濟(jì)措施三個主要途徑分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟程序法規(guī)制； 第四部分，在前文相關(guān)分析的基礎(chǔ)之上，指出我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域惡意訴訟程序法規(guī)制存在的不足之處，結(jié)合國外的相關(guān)立法和實(shí)踐案例，從立法和路徑完善這兩個方面提出建議，以期對司法實(shí)踐中惡意訴訟的減少起到一定的作用。
[Abstract]:With the footsteps of knowledge economy, intellectual property rights protection has become a hot topic among countries and enterprises. Civil action is the last and most advantageous legal means to protect intellectual property rights. However, while strengthening the protection of litigation rights, we should also pay attention to the appearance of "patent rogue" and "patent mantis", which is a phenomenon of illegal abuse of the right of action. Intellectual property rights are monopolistic and exclusive, and malicious litigation perpetrators take advantage of this characteristic, in the name of protecting intellectual property rights, run away competitors, making each other not only damage their goodwill, but also lose valuable business opportunities and markets. Cause the double loss of spirit and material, etc. We should regulate the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, otherwise it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the relative person, hinder the implementation of the intellectual property strategy of our country, and waste limited judicial resources. In the current law of our country, only a few articles are related to the regulation of malicious litigation of intellectual property, which is still relatively simple, scattered, and does not form a system, nor does it identify and regulate the malicious litigation of intellectual property as a whole. Based on the special provisions of the new Civil procedure Law and the intellectual property Law, this paper focuses on how to perfect the relevant system from the procedural law, so as to realize the effective regulation of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property. This article mainly includes the following four parts: the first part, from the academic dispute, the meaning and the characteristic carries on the definition to the intellectual property domain malicious lawsuit behavior, Combining with our country's intellectual property strategy, this paper analyzes the significance of malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property. The second part, before regulating the malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property, combined with the four constitutive elements of tort liability law to identify the malicious litigation. And summarizes the common types of malicious litigation in the field of intellectual property rights in judicial practice, in order to facilitate the practical application of malicious litigation of intellectual property rights; The third part, combined with the special provisions of our new Civil procedure Law and intellectual property related laws, from the pre-lawsuit prohibition defense, professional and technical review and judgment, There are three main ways to analyze the rules and regulations of the malicious procedure of intellectual property rights. The fourth part, on the basis of the previous related analysis, points out the shortcomings of the malicious litigation procedure law system in the field of intellectual property rights in our country, combined with the relevant legislation and practice cases abroad. Some suggestions are put forward from the aspects of legislation and path perfection in order to play a certain role in the reduction of malicious litigation in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 卞輝;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟的程序法應(yīng)對[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年10期

2 董曉敏;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的臨時禁令[J];法律適用;2008年07期

3 曹新明;;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯研究[J];法商研究;2010年06期

4 徐愛國;;英美法中“濫用法律訴訟”的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)家;2000年02期

5 姚頡靖;陳劍鋒;;淺析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴前禁令制度的不足與完善[J];鄭州經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年04期

6 趙雪彥;黎偉華;;懲治惡意訴訟的法律尷尬[J];民主與法制;2007年06期

7 劉晴輝;;正當(dāng)程序視野下的訴前禁令制度[J];清華法學(xué);2008年04期

8 李丹寧;陳爽;;議我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)惡意訴訟之法律規(guī)制[J];中國市場;2008年52期

9 李曉秋;;未決之命題:規(guī)制專利惡意訴訟的“路”與“困”——兼評新《專利法》第23條、第62條[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2010年02期

10 李揚(yáng);;《專利法》第三次修訂草案送審稿的意見和建議[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2007年06期

本文編號：2357072