本文選題：商業(yè)方法專利　切入點(diǎn)：可專利性　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商業(yè)方法的可專利性一直是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)界的一個(gè)爭(zhēng)議熱點(diǎn)。雖然美、日、歐都陸續(xù)接受了商業(yè)方法專利，但他們各自對(duì)商業(yè)方法專利客體的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和審查步驟也不盡相同。美國(guó)在Bilski案后對(duì)客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了大幅的調(diào)整。而我國(guó)對(duì)商業(yè)方法的可專利性并未在立法層面予以規(guī)制，對(duì)商業(yè)方法專利的授權(quán)也始終保持謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度，以嚴(yán)格的客體審查控制著授權(quán)率。審查實(shí)踐中，以專利法第2條第2款“非技術(shù)方案”為由否定可專利性的矛盾比較突出。 本文系統(tǒng)地梳理了美歐商業(yè)方法專利客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的演替和我國(guó)商業(yè)方法專利的客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，同時(shí)結(jié)合我國(guó)審查實(shí)踐，探討適應(yīng)我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情的客體審查方法。 本文由引言、主體部分和結(jié)語(yǔ)三大部分組成。引言中介紹了本文選題的背景、研究?jī)?nèi)容及研究方法，綜敘了國(guó)內(nèi)外的研究現(xiàn)狀。本文的主體部分為第一章至第三章。第一章為商業(yè)方法專利的相關(guān)概念，主要介紹并厘清了與商業(yè)方法專利相關(guān)的幾個(gè)容易混淆的概念，具體包括：商業(yè)方法、商業(yè)方法專利、計(jì)算機(jī)軟件專利、可專利客體和技術(shù)性，并將本文的研究重點(diǎn)聚焦于“以利用計(jì)算機(jī)及網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)實(shí)施商業(yè)方法為主的發(fā)明的客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”上。第二章為美歐商業(yè)方法專利客體審查比較研究。本文選取美國(guó)和歐盟為代表，重點(diǎn)研究了這2個(gè)國(guó)家在商業(yè)方法專利客體審查上的歷史演進(jìn)，詳細(xì)介紹了這2個(gè)國(guó)家現(xiàn)行的客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和具體的審查步驟。第三章為我國(guó)商業(yè)方法專利客體審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與完善建議。從我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)出發(fā)，結(jié)合具體的審查意見(jiàn)，，分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的問(wèn)題和我國(guó)審查實(shí)踐中的制約，并借鑒國(guó)外審查經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)我國(guó)商業(yè)方法專利的客體審查提出了完善建議。結(jié)語(yǔ)中再次總結(jié)了“在現(xiàn)階段，我國(guó)可以從‘嚴(yán)格的客體審查’逐步向‘寬松的客體審查、嚴(yán)格的實(shí)質(zhì)性條件審查’過(guò)渡，并根據(jù)實(shí)際情況把握商業(yè)方法專利的創(chuàng)造性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The patentability of business methods has always been a controversial issue in the intellectual property field. Although the United States, Japan and Europe have accepted business process patents one after another, However, their standards and steps of examination of the object of business method patent are different. After the Bilski case, the United States has made a substantial adjustment to the object review standard, but the patentability of business method in China has not been regulated in the legislative level. In practice, the contradiction of denying patentability on the grounds of Article 2 (2) of Patent Law is obvious. This paper systematically combs the succession of the object examination standard of business method patent in America and Europe and the object examination standard of business method patent in our country. At the same time, combined with the examination practice of our country, this paper discusses the object examination method which adapts to the actual situation of our country. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, main part and conclusion. The introduction introduces the background, research content and research methods of this topic. The main part of this paper is chapters 1 to 3. The first chapter is the related concepts of business method patent, which mainly introduces and clarifies several confusing concepts related to business method patent. Including: business method, business method patent, computer software patent, patentable object and technology, The research focus of this paper is on "Standards of object examination of inventions based on the use of computer and network technology". Chapter two is a comparative study of patent object review of business methods in the United States and Europe. The United States and the European Union are the representatives, Focusing on the historical evolution of the business method patent object review in these two countries, This paper introduces in detail the existing object examination standards and specific examination steps in these two countries. Chapter three is the standards and suggestions for the object examination of business method patents in China. This paper analyzes the problems in the current auditing standards of our country and the constraints in our country's audit practice, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the object examination of the patent of business methods in our country. Our country can gradually transition from 'strict object examination' to 'loose object examination, strict substantive condition examination', and grasp the creative standard of business method patent according to the actual situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐昭紅;美國(guó)商業(yè)方法~1專利制度正當(dāng)性分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年03期

2 余翔,劉珊;美國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件相關(guān)發(fā)明的專利保護(hù)及其與歐盟的比較[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年10期

3 袁建中;;歐洲專利局關(guān)于軟件專利保護(hù)客體之探討[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年09期

4 張平;商業(yè)方法軟件專利保護(hù):美國(guó)的實(shí)踐及其啟示[J];法商研究;2005年04期

5 劉斌斌;;論商業(yè)方法專利的變遷和發(fā)展——以美國(guó)案例的分析和考察為視角[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年01期

6 陳健;;商業(yè)方法可專利性判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

7 李曉秋;;析商業(yè)方法的可專利性[J];政法論壇;2011年02期

8 張玉蓉;;美國(guó)商業(yè)方法專利爭(zhēng)論及司法實(shí)踐最新發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2011年01期

9 王婷;宋河發(fā);曲婉;;主要國(guó)家商業(yè)方法專利的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)指數(shù)監(jiān)測(cè)[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2011年06期

10 張平;論商業(yè)方法軟件專利保護(hù)的創(chuàng)造性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——美、日、歐三方專利審查之比較[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張玉蓉;金融商業(yè)方法專利策略研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1595645