本文關(guān)鍵詞： TPP 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則 我國(guó)選擇　出處：《政法論壇》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則顯失平衡并缺乏可持續(xù)性,不能有效減少知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易和投資壁壘,在世界范圍內(nèi)難以得到推廣,無(wú)法作為未來(lái)國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)談判的范本。TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則與我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)發(fā)展需求不符,與我國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程再平衡理念相悖,實(shí)踐也已證明TPP式知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則在國(guó)際上行不通。我國(guó)并沒有支持TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則的合理理由。我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度發(fā)展應(yīng)當(dāng)走適度保護(hù)和可持續(xù)發(fā)展之路。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)須厘清與市場(chǎng)之間的關(guān)系,其保護(hù)強(qiáng)度須保持在激勵(lì)創(chuàng)新的必要限度內(nèi),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度設(shè)計(jì)須為社會(huì)公眾保留足夠的創(chuàng)新空間和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)空間。同時(shí),我國(guó)需要進(jìn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度創(chuàng)新。在國(guó)際上,我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)以RCEP和"一帶一路"為契機(jī)和平臺(tái),主動(dòng)掌握知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際話語(yǔ)權(quán),完成從國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則"接受者"向"制定者"的轉(zhuǎn)變。積極推動(dòng)RCEP和"一帶一路"知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則走開放、共贏和可持續(xù)發(fā)展之路,為未來(lái)國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的合理發(fā)展指明路徑。
[Abstract]:The TPP intellectual property rules are out of balance and lack of sustainability, which cannot effectively reduce the barriers to intellectual property trade and investment, and is difficult to be popularized around the world. Cannot be used as a model for future international intellectual property negotiations. The TPP intellectual property rules do not conform to China's domestic development needs and contradict the idea of rebalancing the process of economic globalization in China. Practice has also proved that TPP intellectual property rules are not feasible in the world. China has no reasonable reason to support TPP intellectual property rules. The development of domestic intellectual property system should follow the path of moderate protection and sustainable development. Intellectual property protection needs to clarify the relationship with the market, The intensity of protection should be kept within the necessary limits of encouraging innovation, and the design of intellectual property system should keep enough innovation space and competition space for the public. At the same time, our country needs to carry out intellectual property system innovation. China should take the opportunity and platform of RCEP and Belt and Road to take the initiative to master the international discourse right of intellectual property. To complete the transition from "receiver" to "maker" of international intellectual property rights rules and actively promote the opening up, win-win and sustainable development of the intellectual property rights rules of RCEP and Belt and Road, To point out the path for the rational development of the international intellectual property system in the future.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目(1409100)研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 鄭雙雙;;淺析TPP協(xié)定投資草案[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

2 張磊;徐昕;夏瑋;;《跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議》(TPP)草案之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則研究[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2013年05期

3 賈引獅;;美國(guó)與東盟部分國(guó)家就TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題談判的博弈研究——以TPP談判進(jìn)程中美國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)草案為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 蔣陽(yáng)陽(yáng);國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)新動(dòng)向：《TPP協(xié)定》及其對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的影響分析[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

2 張連成;TPP協(xié)議中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

3 李小龍;TPP談判知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)博弈分析[D];山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 謝中偉;論TPP中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)規(guī)則的新趨勢(shì)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

5 戴云飛;TPP協(xié)議知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)草案的歧視規(guī)則剖析及消解[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1520743