本文關(guān)鍵詞： 云計(jì)算 SaaS 信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán) 復(fù)制權(quán) 出租權(quán) 著作權(quán)保護(hù)　出處：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：著作權(quán)制度的更新、完善源于科技的進(jìn)步,科技的發(fā)展推動(dòng)著著作權(quán)相關(guān)立法的前行。未來(lái)的時(shí)代是“云計(jì)算”的時(shí)代,而云計(jì)算既不是對(duì)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的第一次挑戰(zhàn),也不會(huì)是最后一次。隨著“云計(jì)算”相關(guān)技術(shù)的成熟和推廣,其已經(jīng)逐漸成為當(dāng)前與未來(lái)個(gè)人、公司或是單位信息處理的主要方式,而基于元計(jì)算所產(chǎn)生的新的運(yùn)營(yíng)模式,則對(duì)既有的著作權(quán)法體系形成了極大挑戰(zhàn)。以下三種服務(wù)模式都是云計(jì)算的主要模式：即IaaS模式、PaaS模式和SaaS模式。其中,IaaS所指的模式為基礎(chǔ)架構(gòu)即服務(wù)；PaaS所指的模式為即服務(wù)；SaaS所指的模式為軟件即服務(wù)。 隨著信息科技的發(fā)展,作為一種新型的軟件應(yīng)用類(lèi)型,SaaS(軟件即服務(wù))不同于傳統(tǒng)的實(shí)體銷(xiāo)售模式,而是轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐环N具有租賃性質(zhì)的軟件運(yùn)營(yíng)模式,將所需要的軟件置于其云端服務(wù)器,并有償?shù)靥峁┙o用戶“臨時(shí)使用”,同一套軟件將可以同時(shí)出租給多個(gè)租戶使用,這種模式的轉(zhuǎn)變對(duì)軟件的著作權(quán)保護(hù)提出了更高的要求。在"SaaS(軟件即服務(wù))”模式下,云服務(wù)提供者作為特定軟件作品的提供者,當(dāng)其向用戶提供相關(guān)作品時(shí),如果該作品屬于未經(jīng)授權(quán)而加以利用的情形,該類(lèi)行為可為著作權(quán)人的何種專(zhuān)有權(quán)所控制?這些都是需要探究的問(wèn)題。 現(xiàn)行著作權(quán)制度中的專(zhuān)有權(quán)利在規(guī)制SaaS模式下提供軟件和服務(wù)存在適用困境的問(wèn)題,需要進(jìn)一步探討擴(kuò)展。筆者通過(guò)分析,考慮到SaaS軟件使用行為符合出租權(quán)核心構(gòu)成要件,對(duì)出租權(quán)制度進(jìn)行適度擴(kuò)張解釋不僅滿足其自身內(nèi)涵,同時(shí)也契合出租權(quán)的支配性效力。認(rèn)為SaaS模式下提供軟件服務(wù)具備適用出租權(quán)的可行性,但需要對(duì)傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)中規(guī)定的出租權(quán)進(jìn)行擴(kuò)張解釋。 云服務(wù)商加強(qiáng)服務(wù)系統(tǒng)的保護(hù)能在一定程度上平衡公共利益與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)。如果利益不夠平衡,則可能會(huì)引發(fā)公眾的抵制情緒,同時(shí)也不利于云計(jì)算相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,最終損害更多人的利益。
[Abstract]:The renewal and perfection of copyright system originates from the progress of science and technology. The development of science and technology promotes the progress of copyright legislation. The future era is the era of "cloud computing". Cloud computing is neither the first challenge to copyright protection nor the last. With the maturity and promotion of cloud computing related technologies, cloud computing has gradually become the current and future individuals. The main way in which companies or units process information, and based on the new business model generated by meta-computing. The following three service models are the main models of cloud computing: IaaS model PaaS model and SaaS model. IaaS refers to a pattern of infrastructure as a service; PaaS refers to the mode as a service; SaaS refers to a pattern of software as a service. With the development of information technology, SaaS (Software as a Service), as a new type of software application, is different from the traditional physical sales mode, but has changed into a kind of software operation mode with the nature of lease. By placing the required software on its cloud server and making it available for "temporary use" at a cost, the same set of software will be available for rental to multiple tenants at the same time. The transformation of this model puts forward higher requirements for the copyright protection of software. In the "SaaS (Software as a Service)" mode, cloud service providers are the providers of specific software works. When it provides the user with the relevant work, if the work is used without authorization, what kind of exclusive right can be controlled by the copyright owner? These are all questions that need to be explored. In the current copyright system, the exclusive rights of providing software and services under the regulation of SaaS mode are difficult to apply, which need to be further explored and expanded. Considering that the use of SaaS software conforms to the core elements of rental rights, the moderate expansion of the system of rental rights not only meets its own connotation. At the same time, it also accords with the dominating effect of the lease right. It is considered that the software service provided under the SaaS mode has the feasibility of applying the lease right, but it needs to expand and explain the rental right stipulated in the traditional copyright. Cloud service providers to strengthen the protection of service systems can to some extent balance the public interest and intellectual property rights. If the interests are not balanced, it may lead to public resistance. At the same time, it is not conducive to the development of cloud computing related industries, and ultimately harm the interests of more people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉蔚文;論著作權(quán)中的出租權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年10期

2 朱理;;臨時(shí)復(fù)制是否屬于著作權(quán)法意義上的復(fù)制——以國(guó)際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年01期

3 胡開(kāi)忠;關(guān)于著作出租權(quán)制度的理論探討及立法動(dòng)議[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年02期

4 肖剛,韓強(qiáng);試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的復(fù)制權(quán)[J];法學(xué);2003年06期

5 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

6 胡開(kāi)忠;;“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”在視頻分享網(wǎng)站版權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定中的適用[J];法學(xué);2009年12期

7 梁志文;;云計(jì)算、技術(shù)中立與版權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué);2011年03期

8 李名標(biāo);淺析Internet發(fā)展的動(dòng)因[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

9 劉開(kāi)國(guó);;紅旗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵權(quán)責(zé)任中的適用[J];新世紀(jì)圖書(shū)館;2007年05期

10 孫遠(yuǎn)釗;;初探“云計(jì)算”的著作權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];科技與法律;2010年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1490529