【摘要】：在我國國情下，舉報人是指向有關(guān)公共權(quán)力機關(guān)檢舉、報告、揭發(fā)國家機關(guān)及其工作人員的違紀、違法、犯罪行為的公民、法人和其他組織。在力行反腐的時代背景下，強調(diào)舉報作為公權(quán)力行使的有效監(jiān)督手段有利于國家反腐事業(yè)的順利進行。在舉報人保護方面，舉報受理及主管機關(guān)對舉報人承擔保護義務(wù)和責任，鑒于現(xiàn)階段公權(quán)力行使的不規(guī)范性，行政法上舉報人保護制度的重點應為：對檢舉揭發(fā)公權(quán)力違規(guī)違法行使的舉報人進行法律保護，以及對公權(quán)力機關(guān)不依法履行保護義務(wù)的法律規(guī)制；對舉報人進行保護的責任主體為公權(quán)力機關(guān)，保護的客體為舉報人的自由權(quán)利和國家安定的權(quán)力秩序。相較于舉報人的行政法保護，司法保護已經(jīng)相對完善，所以從行政法的角度構(gòu)建舉報人保護制度非常必要。應當從舉報人、保護機關(guān)這兩個主體出發(fā)，構(gòu)建以信息保護、人身保護、權(quán)利救濟為重點，，舉報人和保護機關(guān)雙向互動的保護體系，并推動舉報人保護制度的法律實踐。
[Abstract]:Under the national conditions of our country, the informant refers to the citizens, legal persons and other organizations who point to the relevant public power organs to report, report and expose the disciplinary, illegal and criminal acts of state organs and their functionaries. In the era of anti-corruption, emphasizing that reporting as an effective means of monitoring the exercise of public power is conducive to the smooth progress of the national anti-corruption cause. With regard to the protection of whistle-blowers, the acceptance of the report and the responsibility of the competent authority for the protection of the informant, in view of the irregularity of the exercise of public power at the present stage, The emphasis of the whistle-blower protection system in administrative law should be as follows: legal protection of whistle-blowers who expose the illegal exercise of public power and the legal regulation of the failure of public power organs to perform their protection obligations according to law; The main body of responsibility for protecting the whistle-blower is the public power organ, and the object of protection is the whistleblower's free right and the stable power order of the country. Compared with the protection of the whistleblower's administrative law, the judicial protection has been relatively perfect, so it is necessary to construct the whistle-blower protection system from the angle of administrative law. It is necessary to construct a two-way interactive protection system based on the protection of information, personal protection and right relief, and to promote the legal practice of the whistleblower protection system from the perspective of the whistle-blower and the protection organ.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賴彩明;賴德亮;;加強公民舉報權(quán)的制度保障[J];法學;2006年07期

2 王延波;;公職人員名譽權(quán)與言論自由沖突的憲法定位[J];西部法學評論;2010年02期

3 寧立成;;檢舉權(quán)的法理探析[J];河北法學;2011年01期

4 王宏強;論政治合法性的三個層面[J];中共濟南市委黨校濟南市行政學院濟南市社會主義學院學報;2003年01期

5 王有強;董紅;;完善我國舉報制度的幾點思考[J];經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展;2005年11期

6 寧立成;;我國檢舉人權(quán)利保障制度的完善——美國“吹口哨人保護法”及其啟示[J];江西社會科學;2008年10期

7 李亮;公務(wù)員檢舉權(quán)的法律探討[J];陜西省行政學院.陜西省經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2003年04期

8 李建華;牛磊;;行政檢舉的基本問題闡釋與合法性辯證[J];學海;2009年02期

9 陳江;中國舉報人的下落[J];中國新聞周刊;2005年25期

10 黃小波;;試論舉報答復行為的行政法屬性[J];行政法學研究;2007年04期

本文編號：2465803