【摘要】：眾所周知，公權力具有主動性和擴張性，如果不對它進行約束，會不可避免的損害公民的合法權利。行政權是與公民聯(lián)系最為密切的權力，是國家權力體系中不可或缺的組成部分，對公民權利的影響也最大。行政裁量權作為行政權的一種，更是深刻影響著行政相對人的合法權益。20世紀以來，隨著行政權力的日益膨脹，行政裁量權也廣泛地存在于行政行為的各個領域。它猶如一把“雙刃劍”，一方面能使行政主體審時度勢，機動靈活的處理行政問題，提高行政效率，另一方面也容易導致權力的濫用和失控，侵害公民的合法權利，破壞法律法規(guī)的嚴肅性和權威性。合理運用行政裁量權，消除其負面影響，加強對行政裁量權濫用的控制，是現(xiàn)代法治國家依法治國的必然要求。 對行政裁量權濫用的防控，無論大陸法系國家還是英美法系國家，，各國都把它當作行政法的核心問題加以研究，并提出了許多防控措施。本文主要研究的內容是探討當前情況下我國行政主體行政裁量權濫用的主要形態(tài)、行政裁量權濫用的原因分析，以及如何對行政裁量權的濫用進行有效防控。本文重點在于論證行政裁量權濫用的防控，結合我國的國情與實際，在傳統(tǒng)防控措施的基礎上提出了新的可行方案，這些措施對于實現(xiàn)行政裁量權的合法、合理運用，最終推進我國依法行政，建設社會主義法治國家，具有一定的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:As we all know, public power has initiative and expansibility, if it is not restricted, it will inevitably damage the legitimate rights of citizens. Executive power is the most closely related power with citizens, is an indispensable part of the state power system, and has the greatest influence on civil rights. As a kind of administrative power, administrative discretion deeply affects the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Since the 20th century, with the increasing expansion of administrative power, administrative discretion also widely exists in various fields of administrative behavior. It is like a "double-edged sword". On the one hand, it can make the administrative subject judge the situation, deal with administrative problems flexibly and flexibly, and improve the administrative efficiency. On the other hand, it also easily leads to the abuse and loss of control of power and infringes on the legal rights of citizens. To undermine the seriousness and authority of laws and regulations. Rational use of administrative discretion, eliminating its negative effects and strengthening the control of abuse of administrative discretion are the inevitable requirements of ruling the country by law in a modern country ruled by law. The prevention and control of the abuse of administrative discretion, whether in civil law countries or in common law countries, has been studied as the core issue of administrative law, and many preventive measures have been put forward. The main content of this paper is to discuss the main forms of the abuse of administrative discretion in our country under the current circumstances, the analysis of the reasons for the abuse of administrative discretion, and how to effectively prevent and control the abuse of administrative discretion. This paper focuses on proving the prevention and control of the abuse of administrative discretion, combining the situation and reality of our country, and putting forward new feasible schemes on the basis of the traditional prevention and control measures, which can realize the legal and reasonable application of the administrative discretion. Finally, it is of theoretical and practical significance to promote our country's administration according to law and to build a socialist country ruled by law.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳紅宇;知情權、WTO與政府信息公開[J];當代法學;2003年08期

2 袁明圣;對濫用職權與顯失公正行為的司法審查[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);1996年06期

3 鄭春燕;;行政裁量中的政策考量——以“運動式”執(zhí)法為例[J];法商研究;2008年02期

4 肖萍;楊旋;;關于我國行政聽證制度的立法構想[J];法學雜志;2011年07期

5 王貴松;;行政裁量權收縮之要件分析——以危險防止型行政為中心[J];法學評論;2009年03期

6 江必新;;論行政程序的正當性及其監(jiān)督[J];法治研究;2011年01期

7 張明杰;行政自由裁量權及其法律控制[J];法學研究;1995年04期

8 朱芒;論行政程序正當化的法根據(jù)——日本行政程序法的發(fā)展及其啟示[J];外國法譯評;1997年01期

9 郭道暉;法治行政與行政權的發(fā)展[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1999年01期

10 司久貴;行政自由裁量權若干問題探討[J];行政法學研究;1998年02期

本文編號：2398469