天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 行政法論文 >

行政可訴性 的翻譯結(jié)果

發(fā)布時間:2017-01-03 17:37

  本文關鍵詞:論行政可訴性原則之確立,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。


 在分類學科中查詢

所有學科

公安

訴訟法與司法制度

 歷史查詢

 

行政可訴性

  • administrative actionability(2)
  • possibility of the administrative lawsuit(1)
  •   

         Administrative Actionability for Responsibility Confirmation of Road Traffic Accidents

         論道路交通事故責任認定的行政可訴性

    短句來源

         A Study of the Administrative Actionability of Investigative Acts of Public Security Authorities

         公安偵查行為行政可訴性研究

    短句來源

      

         Analysis on the Possibility of the Administrative Lawsuit against the Decision on the Tourist Complaints

         旅游投訴處理決定的行政可訴性評析

    短句來源

      

         Since the public nature is a kind of administrative confirmation action, so it can be suited.

         因為公證行為的“公”職性質(zhì)是一種行政確認行為,行政確認行為具有行政可訴性,公證行為具有行政可訴性。

    短句來源

         Which can be sued for compensation in the controversial practice is controversial, this paper focuses, executive compensation through litigation to resolve disputes;

         其中關于補償爭議的行政可訴性是實踐中爭議較大的,本文重點論述,提出行政補償爭議應通過訴訟途徑解決:雖然國外有將補償訴訟作為民事案件審理的做法,,但人民法院應作為行政案件審理;

    短句來源

         This paper discusses the controversial executive compensation litigation, compensation lawsuits admissibility condition, and a decision of the trial proceedings, the application of the law of compensation proceedings, compensation litigation inspiration for the "Administrative Procedural Law," the revised five issues.

         本文主要論及補償爭議的行政可訴性、補償訴訟的受理條件、補償訴訟的審理及判決方式、補償訴訟的法律適用、補償訴訟制度對《行政訴訟法》修訂的啟示等五個問題。

    短句來源

         On the Establishment of Litigable Principle in Administrative Law

         論行政可訴性原則之確立

    短句來源

         In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued.

         在法律規(guī)范和司法實踐中,關于火災事故責任認定的行政可訴性問題存在著現(xiàn)實的矛盾和分歧。

    短句來源

    更多       

      

         Prosecutability of Abstract Administrative Behavior

         抽象行政行為的可訴性

    短句來源

         On Litigation of the Abstract Administrative Behaviors

         試論抽象行政行為的可訴性

    短句來源

         Opinions on the Problem of Claim on Abstract Administrative Action

         論抽象行政行為的可訴性

    短句來源

         On suability of abstract administrative action

         論抽象行政行為的可訴性

    短句來源

         Analysis of the litigable nature of administrative factual action

         行政事實行為的可訴性分析

    短句來源

    查詢“行政可訴性”譯詞為用戶自定義的雙語例句
        我想查看譯文中含有:的雙語例句



    There are more and more misuses of administrative lawsuit in public security investigation with more and more overuses of civilians, legal persons and organizations legal rights in the investigation by public security organizations.To solve the problems in the action,there are litigants for lawsuit,peoples courts for reception and some other organizations for proofs.

    隨著公安機關在偵查過程中對公民、法人和其他組織合法權(quán)益的侵害增多 ,公安偵查行為行政可訴性的不完善性越來越明顯。解決這一問題辦法即通過形式審查當事人的起訴后 ,由人民法院行政庭全部受理當事人對公安偵查行為的訴訟 ,再由法院對案件進行實體審查 ,審查案件的法律依據(jù)和事實依據(jù)并確定其偵查行為的性質(zhì) ,進而確定其是否具有可訴性 ,是否應該支持當事人的訴訟請求。

    In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued. In order to clarify the essence of this question, we only recognize its basic attribute from the nature of the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire, and grasp the effect of the legal provisions about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire from the angle of legal principles, then we will make clear...

    In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued. In order to clarify the essence of this question, we only recognize its basic attribute from the nature of the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire, and grasp the effect of the legal provisions about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire from the angle of legal principles, then we will make clear that the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire is a kind of concrete administrative behavior that can be sued. The author expects that those improper legal provisions can be abolished as soon as possible and a consensus can be reached on the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued, so that the socialist construction governed by the law can be advanced and the fundamental interests of the people can be safeguarded.

    在法律規(guī)范和司法實踐中,關于火災事故責任認定的行政可訴性問題存在著現(xiàn)實的矛盾和分歧。為了澄清問題的實質(zhì),筆者從火災事故責任認定的本質(zhì)出發(fā),清楚認識其根本屬性,并從法理的角度理順火災事故責任認定的有關法律規(guī)定的位階、效力,進而明確火災事故責任認定是一種可訴的具體行政行為,以期在我國法律制度中盡快取消一切與此相對的不適當?shù)姆梢?guī)定,對于火災事故責任認定的行政可訴性形成統(tǒng)一的認識,以更好地推進我國社會主義法治建設,維護廣大人民的根本利益。

    Whether the cognizance of traffic accident responsibility may have its nature of adminis- trative litigation has at all times been the focus for debate between the academic circle in theory and the judicial circle in practice.“The Safety Act of Roadway Traffic”implemented on May 1, 2004 has resolved this issue.This Act calls off the cognizance of public security authority regard- ing the responsibility of roadway traffic accident,and hands over the jurisdiction of this kind of accident to the People's Court.The...

    Whether the cognizance of traffic accident responsibility may have its nature of adminis- trative litigation has at all times been the focus for debate between the academic circle in theory and the judicial circle in practice.“The Safety Act of Roadway Traffic”implemented on May 1, 2004 has resolved this issue.This Act calls off the cognizance of public security authority regard- ing the responsibility of roadway traffic accident,and hands over the jurisdiction of this kind of accident to the People's Court.The implementation of this Act indicates that the treatment of roadway traffic accident in our country has become more rightful,at the same time,has con- formed to the tendency of international judicial practice.

    交通事故責任認定是否具有行政可訴性一直是理論界和審判實務界長期爭論的焦點。2004年5月1日實施的《中華人民共和國道路交通安全法》解決了這個問題,取消了公安機關道路交通事故責任認定權(quán),將事故的裁判權(quán)交由人民法院。此法的實施標志著我國道路交通事故的處理更加合理,同時也更符合與國際司法接軌的大趨勢。

     

     相關查詢

     



     

    CNKI小工具

    在英文學術搜索中查有關行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

    在知識搜索中查有關行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

    在數(shù)字搜索中查有關行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

    在概念知識元中查有關行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

    在學術趨勢中查有關行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

     

     


      本文關鍵詞:論行政可訴性原則之確立,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。



    本文編號:233224

    資料下載
    論文發(fā)表

    本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/233224.html


    Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

    版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶ed65a***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com