【摘要】：本文首先以北京市E中級法院2014-2016年3年受理的執(zhí)行審查類案件為分析樣本,對執(zhí)行審查權(quán)的運(yùn)行情況進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。進(jìn)而提出執(zhí)行審查權(quán)在運(yùn)行中出現(xiàn)的問題并分析原因。之后對執(zhí)行審查權(quán)的基本理論性問題進(jìn)行探析,明確了執(zhí)行審查權(quán)是執(zhí)行權(quán)的下位概念,雖具有司法權(quán)屬性,但不同于執(zhí)行裁判權(quán),不是審判權(quán)。最后分別從執(zhí)行審查權(quán)的合理配置、執(zhí)行審查程序的規(guī)范與發(fā)展和執(zhí)行審查程序與其他程序的銜接3個(gè)方面,嘗試在審執(zhí)分離的改革背景下重構(gòu)執(zhí)行審查權(quán)。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the executive review cases accepted by E Intermediate Court of Beijing in 2014-2016 are taken as the analysis samples to make an empirical analysis on the operation of the executive review power. Then put forward the implementation of the right to review in the operation of the problems and analysis of the reasons. After analyzing the basic theoretical issues of the executive review power, it is clear that the executive review power is the lower concept of the executive power. Although it has the attribute of judicial power, it is different from the executive adjudication power and not the judicial power. Finally, the author tries to reconstruct the executive review right under the background of the separation of trial and execution from three aspects: the rational allocation of executive review power, the standardization and development of executive review procedure and the connection between executive review procedure and other procedures.
【作者單位】： 中央民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院;北京市第二中級人民法院;
【分類號】：D922.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 苗愛軍;留置審查權(quán)的法律研究[J];黃岡師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

，

本文編號：2300967