【摘要】：本文在理論研究的范疇內,從藝術品拍賣關系為大的前提出發(fā),結合目前我國藝術品拍賣過程中的一些問題,在廣義上對藝術品的概念進行整理和概括,指明藝術品應該具備的特征。從藝術品拍賣人與委托人和買受人的法律關系進行歸納和整理,分析藝術品拍賣法律關系的實質和主要特征,明確藝術品拍賣人和委托人之間委托合同的隱名代理性質。在理論的范疇清晰的闡述藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責理論的內容,為后續(xù)的研究做理論的鋪墊。 在中后的章節(jié)中依然從我國藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責條款出發(fā),從其擔保免責的內涵到使用情況乃至對使用情況的質疑幾個方面對目前的瑕疵擔保免責條款進行分析和整理,指出目前瑕疵擔保免責理論的不足之處。在國外的理論研究上,韓國、英國、美國為典型,闡述上述幾個國家在相關立法上和實踐中采取的與我國的不同的法律法規(guī)與措施,并進行評析,以期達到借鑒和學習的目的。最后的完善相關的建議中,主要從立法改善以及相關措施處罰,重點引入介紹藝術品擔保金制度和行業(yè)鑒定委員會的設立,綜合了各個方面的考量,希望對我國的藝術品瑕疵擔保免責條款的改進有所幫助和改良。 本文分為五個部分： 第一部分是對藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責該課題的由來、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究的范圍和方法進行概述說明。 第二部分為藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責相關法律關系的概述,了解藝術品拍賣中的拍賣法律關系中相應的特點。 第三部分為藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責條款的研究分析總結拍賣法第六十一條,進行否定,進而闡明藝術品拍賣人瑕疵免責條款的不合理性。 第四部分為國外藝術品拍賣瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責的規(guī)制,介紹了英國、美國、司法實踐和經驗做法,并第一次引入了韓國有關瑕疵擔保的相關法律法規(guī)。 第五部分是藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保免責責任的完善意見,從對我國目前現(xiàn)行的拍賣法及相關法律法規(guī)的改良處罰,完善行業(yè)自治體系,在新時期下以淘寶藝術品拍賣為典型,對新型網絡藝術品拍賣總結,提出藝術品瑕疵的拍賣擔保金的制度。
[Abstract]:In the scope of theoretical research, from the premise of art auction relationship, combining with some problems in the process of art auction in our country at present, this paper arranges and generalizes the concept of art in a broad sense. Specify the characteristics of an art object. This paper summarizes and arranges the legal relationship between the auctioneer and the consignor and the buyer, analyzes the essence and main features of the legal relationship of the art auction, and clarifies the anonymous agency nature of the entrustment contract between the auctioneer and the consignor. In the theoretical category, the clear elaboration of the art defects auction warranty exemption theory content, for the subsequent research to do the theoretical groundwork. In the middle and later chapters, we still proceed from the auction guarantee exemption clause of our country's works of art flaw, analyze and sort out the current defect guarantee exemption clause from the connotation of its guarantee exemption to the usage and even the doubt of the usage. This paper points out the deficiency of the theory of disclaimer of defect guarantee at present. In the theoretical research of foreign countries, Korea, Britain and the United States are typical. This paper expounds the different laws and regulations and measures adopted by these countries in the relevant legislation and practice, and evaluates them in order to achieve the purpose of reference and study. In the final consummation related suggestion, mainly from the legislative improvement and the related measure punishment, introduces the introduction art guarantee fund system and the establishment of the industry appraisal committee, synthesizes each aspect consideration, The author hopes to improve the disclaimer clause of art defects in our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is about the origin of the subject, the research status, the scope and methods of the research. The second part is an overview of the legal relationship related to the auction guarantee exemption of the defects of art, understanding the corresponding characteristics of the auction legal relationship in the art auction. The third part is the research and analysis of the exemption clause of the auction guarantee for the defect of works of art. The article 61 of the auction law is summarized and negated, and then the irrationality of the exemption clause of the defect of the art auctioneer is clarified. The fourth part is the regulation of auction guarantee exemption for foreign art auction defects. It introduces the British, American, judicial practice and experience practice, and introduces the relevant laws and regulations of Korea for the first time. The fifth part is the perfection of the exemption responsibility of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art, from the current auction law and related laws and regulations of our country to improve punishment, perfect the system of industry autonomy, in the new period, Taobao art auction as a typical, This paper summarizes the new network art auction, and puts forward the system of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.294;D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 劉寧元;;論構建我國拍賣法律制度的若干問題[J];法學;2007年06期

2 崔建遠;;中國債法的現(xiàn)狀與未來[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2013年01期

3 和靜鈞;;境外拍賣法律規(guī)范與啟示[J];檢察風云;2007年02期

4 宋勝春;;淺析“按現(xiàn)狀拍賣”規(guī)則[J];中國拍賣;2006年02期

，

本文編號：2140280