本文選題：慈善募捐 + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐�。� 參考：《復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐日益成為慈善募捐的重要渠道的同時(shí)產(chǎn)生了大量糾紛和問(wèn)題,也凸顯現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)范之不足。在《慈善法》頒布實(shí)施之后,慈善募捐有了一定依據(jù),但是依然需要從原理到規(guī)則層面進(jìn)行全面梳理和廓清。募捐主體、募捐地域限制和網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺(tái)的法律地位是其中最為關(guān)鍵的三個(gè)問(wèn)題。首先,本文在區(qū)分慈善募捐與個(gè)人求助兩個(gè)概念之后,揭示出個(gè)人求助的規(guī)制困境;而且因?yàn)椤洞壬品ā访鞔_表態(tài)不調(diào)整個(gè)人求助,所以只能適用其他法律法規(guī)對(duì)其進(jìn)行規(guī)制。在排除了營(yíng)利組織、互益組織、政府部門(mén)和媒體之后,募捐主體只能限于公益性的非營(yíng)利組織。這不僅源于此類(lèi)組織的特殊屬性,也關(guān)乎公開(kāi)募捐的公益性特征;其次,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)行慈善組織行政管理體制受限于行政區(qū)域,因此網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐的備案不可避免地受到地域限制,而網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐突破地域限制已經(jīng)成為現(xiàn)實(shí),《慈善法》出于對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的接受與回應(yīng),放松地域限制成為必然的選擇;最后,網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐平臺(tái)的法律地位有三種分類(lèi)——企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的方式、聯(lián)合勸募組織和職業(yè)勸募機(jī)構(gòu),所以對(duì)其規(guī)制除了從網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的視角進(jìn)行考量之外,還需要從不同組織性質(zhì)的角度予以關(guān)注。
[Abstract]:Network fundraising has become an important channel for charitable fundraising, which has caused a lot of disputes and problems, and also highlights the shortcomings of current legal norms. After the promulgation and implementation of the Charity Law, there is a certain basis for charity fundraising, but it still needs to be sorted out and clarified from the principle to the rule level. The main body, the regional limitation and the legal status of the online fundraising platform are the three key issues. First of all, after distinguishing the two concepts of charity fundraising and individual help, this paper reveals the dilemma of individual help regulation, and because the Charity Law clearly states that it does not adjust individual help, it can only be regulated by other laws and regulations. After excluding profit-making organizations, mutual benefit organizations, government departments and the media, donors can only be confined to non-profit organizations. This is due not only to the special attributes of such organizations, but also to the public welfare characteristics of public donations. Secondly, because the current administrative system of charitable organizations is limited to administrative areas, the filing of online donations is inevitably subject to geographical restrictions. But the network collection breaks through the geographical limit has become the reality, the "charity law" out of the reality of the acceptance and response, relaxation of the regional restrictions become the inevitable choice; finally, There are three categories of the legal status of the online fundraising platform: the ways in which enterprises assume social responsibility, the joint solicitation organizations and the professional solicitation agencies, so the regulation of these platforms is not only considered from the perspective of the Internet service provider, but also from the perspective of the Internet service provider. Attention also needs to be given to the nature of the different organizations.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.182.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蔣曉玲;;非公益性捐贈(zèng)存在的問(wèn)題及其法律規(guī)制研究[J];政法論叢;2015年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 金錦萍;;《慈善法》實(shí)施后網(wǎng)絡(luò)募捐的法律規(guī)制[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年04期

2 田土城;袁洋;;私益募捐活動(dòng)中的法律問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué)教育研究;2015年04期

【二級(jí)參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周賢日;;許可抑或備案:社會(huì)募捐的管理路徑選擇[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2013年01期

2 王繼遠(yuǎn);胡衛(wèi)萍;;論慈善私益捐贈(zèng)[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年01期

3 楊道波;;公益募捐法律規(guī)制論綱[J];法學(xué)論壇;2009年04期

4 江希和;;有關(guān)慈善捐贈(zèng)稅收優(yōu)惠政策的國(guó)際比較[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2007年21期

5 少月;;中美捐贈(zèng)制度對(duì)比[J];新財(cái)經(jīng);2006年11期

6 冷傳莉;;社會(huì)募捐中捐款余額所有權(quán)問(wèn)題探析[J];中外法學(xué);2006年02期

7 劉瑩;我國(guó)社會(huì)募捐的四大癥結(jié)[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2005年09期

8 鐘俊,李功國(guó);余其山訴廣西橫縣地稅局案評(píng)析——兼論社會(huì)募捐行為的性質(zhì)[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

9 冷傳莉;募捐行為法律性質(zhì)之探討[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

10 宋海洋;社會(huì)捐贈(zèng)剩余的法律評(píng)析[J];法學(xué);2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1943575