本文選題：房屋征收補(bǔ)償 + 市場法��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：國有土地上房屋征收活動(dòng)中，確定被征收房屋的價(jià)值是一項(xiàng)至關(guān)重要的工作，作為房屋征收補(bǔ)償?shù)闹匾h(huán)節(jié)，合法的評估結(jié)果對于維護(hù)公共利益、保障被征收人的合法權(quán)益具有重要作用。國有土地上房屋征收評估是根據(jù)被評估房屋所在的區(qū)位、建筑面積、用途、成新程度等因素，按照一定的方式進(jìn)行測算，評定或估算該房屋的市場價(jià)值。評估結(jié)果合法性不僅是數(shù)字上合法，還包含著過程的合法，因此評估方法的合法選用，有助于正確確定房屋價(jià)值，是實(shí)現(xiàn)評定估算被征收房屋價(jià)值的重要手段。本文通過分析研究《國有土地上房屋征收評估辦法》規(guī)定的四種評估辦法：市場法、收益法、成本法、假設(shè)開發(fā)法，著重對四種辦法進(jìn)行集中闡述與對比，從其基本含義、一般程序、關(guān)鍵參數(shù)以及注意事項(xiàng)等，論述了房屋征收評估合法性的要件和判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。同時(shí)，分析可能影響評估結(jié)果合法性的幾個(gè)評估后關(guān)鍵程序，，如公示評估結(jié)果、送達(dá)評估報(bào)告、申請復(fù)核評估等，建議要通過完善評估機(jī)構(gòu)和評估人員的市場準(zhǔn)入機(jī)制，健全評估機(jī)構(gòu)和評估人員的退出機(jī)制，細(xì)化評估機(jī)構(gòu)和評估人員的責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式等途徑，建立和完善房屋評估法律監(jiān)督制度，確立公正的房屋征收價(jià)格評估機(jī)制，對進(jìn)一步完善國有土地上房屋征收制度、維護(hù)被征收人合法權(quán)益有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In the activities of expropriation of houses on state-owned land, determining the value of the houses being expropriated is a crucial task. As an important part of the compensation for housing expropriation, legal evaluation results are of great importance to the protection of the public interest. The protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the expropriated persons has an important role. The assessment of housing expropriation on state-owned land is based on the location, building area, use, new degree and other factors of the house to be evaluated, and the market value of the house is evaluated or estimated in a certain way. The legitimacy of evaluation results is not only digital legality, but also includes the legal process. Therefore, the legal selection of evaluation methods is helpful to determine the value of houses correctly, and is an important means to realize the evaluation and estimate of the value of the expropriated houses. Based on the analysis and study of the four evaluation methods stipulated in the methods of Housing expropriation and Evaluation on State-owned Land: market method, income method, cost method, hypothetical development method, this paper focuses on the four methods, which are elaborated and compared, and their basic meanings are analyzed and compared. General procedure, key parameters and matters needing attention are discussed in this paper. At the same time, the analysis of several post-assessment key procedures that may affect the legitimacy of the assessment results, such as publicizing the results, delivering the assessment reports, applying for review of the assessment, and so on, suggests that market access mechanisms for evaluation agencies and evaluators should be improved. Perfect the exit mechanism of the appraisal organization and the appraiser, refine the way that the appraisal organization and the appraiser assume the responsibility, establish and perfect the legal supervision system of the housing appraisal, establish the fair appraisal mechanism of the house collection and price, To further improve the system of housing expropriation on state-owned land, to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the expropriated persons.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾國華;;發(fā)達(dá)國家土地征收補(bǔ)償制度及對我國的借鑒[J];國土資源科技管理;2006年04期

2 邢鴻飛;蔡鵬;;論我國房屋征收制度之發(fā)展與完善——兼評《國有土地上房屋征收與補(bǔ)償條例》[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2011年10期

3 王利明;;《物權(quán)法》的實(shí)施與征收征用制度的完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年04期

4 范利平;;論城市房屋征收制度的建立——拆遷制度的徹底變革[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

5 楊寅;公共利益的程序主義考量[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

6 王s

本文編號：1822125