發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-03 12:07

  本文選題：行政規(guī)范性文件　切入點(diǎn)：備案審查　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政規(guī)范性文件在政府行使公共管理職能中發(fā)揮著重要作用。加強(qiáng)對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件的管理,不僅有利于從源頭上保證行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行政,還有利于防止行政權(quán)力濫用,保護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益不受侵害。本文以行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查糾錯(cuò)的基本問(wèn)題為起點(diǎn),闡述行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查的概念和主要功能。通過(guò)對(duì)糾錯(cuò)機(jī)制的主要構(gòu)成要素,如糾錯(cuò)主體、糾錯(cuò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、糾錯(cuò)方式、糾錯(cuò)結(jié)果執(zhí)行的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)其存在著諸多問(wèn)題和不足。主要問(wèn)題包括:第一,立法規(guī)定不周延。一方面,缺少對(duì)糾錯(cuò)程序進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一規(guī)范的全國(guó)性立法。另一方面,各地方性法規(guī)、地方政府規(guī)章對(duì)同一問(wèn)題的規(guī)定不盡相同。第二,糾錯(cuò)能力不足。不僅在機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置和人員配備上不完善,工作人員缺乏工作經(jīng)驗(yàn),而且對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件的識(shí)別能力不足。第三,糾錯(cuò)方式不嚴(yán)密。一方面未明確規(guī)定可以適用的糾錯(cuò)方式。另一方面,也未明確具體措施的適用條件。第四,糾錯(cuò)結(jié)果難執(zhí)行。第五,缺乏責(zé)任追究機(jī)制。針對(duì)現(xiàn)行糾錯(cuò)機(jī)制在運(yùn)行中存在的問(wèn)題,本文提出了幾項(xiàng)完善建議。首先要提高糾錯(cuò)處理能力,主要從完善工作機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置及人員配備以及提高識(shí)別行政規(guī)范性文件的能力上改進(jìn)。其次,構(gòu)建一種類型化的糾錯(cuò)方式。將各種糾錯(cuò)措施按照一定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)確定各自所適用的范圍,形成一種有機(jī)結(jié)構(gòu)體系,使得各種糾錯(cuò)處理案件均能在體系中準(zhǔn)確的找到最佳的糾錯(cuò)方式進(jìn)行適用。再次,明確糾錯(cuò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。確立合法性與合理性雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。此外,完善糾錯(cuò)結(jié)果的執(zhí)行。建立反饋機(jī)制,提出建立糾錯(cuò)結(jié)果執(zhí)行后的反饋機(jī)制,不僅要明確反饋制度,還要對(duì)反饋制度的具體程序做細(xì)致規(guī)定。最后,完善責(zé)任追究。一方面,應(yīng)嚴(yán)格行政規(guī)范性文件制定機(jī)關(guān)的責(zé)任追究,根據(jù)具體違法程度的不同,明確相應(yīng)的責(zé)任。另一方面,對(duì)糾錯(cuò)機(jī)關(guān)未依法履行糾錯(cuò)職責(zé)的,應(yīng)給予相應(yīng)的處罰,明確其應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Administrative normative documents play an important role in the government's public management function.Strengthening the management of administrative normative documents is not only conducive to ensuring the administration of administrative organs according to law from the source, but also conducive to preventing the abuse of administrative power and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of citizens from being infringed upon.Based on the basic problems of administrative normative document filing and correcting, this paper expounds the concept and main functions of administrative normative document record review.Through the analysis of the main components of the error correction mechanism, such as the subject of error correction, the error correction standard, the error correction method and the execution of error correction results, it is found that there are many problems and shortcomings in the error correction mechanism.The main problems include: first, the legislative provisions are not comprehensive.On the one hand, there is a lack of national legislation to standardize error correction procedures.On the other hand, local laws and regulations, local government regulations on the same issue are not the same.Second, the ability to correct errors is inadequate.Not only in the establishment and staffing of the organization is not perfect, the staff lack of work experience, but also the identification of administrative normative documents is insufficient.Third, error correction is not strict.On the one hand, there is no clear regulation of the applicable error correction methods.On the other hand, there is no clear conditions for the application of specific measures.Fourth, error correction results are difficult to implement.Fifth, the lack of accountability mechanism.In view of the problems existing in the operation of the current error correction mechanism, this paper puts forward several suggestions for perfection.First of all, we should improve the ability of error correction, mainly from perfecting the working organization setting and staffing, and improving the ability of identifying administrative normative documents.Secondly, a type of error correction method is constructed.According to certain standards, a kind of organic structure system can be formed, so that all kinds of error correction cases can find the best way to correct errors in the system.Again, clear error correction criteria.Establish double standards of legitimacy and rationality.In addition, improve the implementation of error correction results.To establish the feedback mechanism and to establish the feedback mechanism after the implementation of the error correction results, not only the feedback system should be clearly defined, but also the specific procedures of the feedback system should be carefully stipulated.Finally, improve accountability.On the one hand, we should strictly investigate the responsibility of the administrative normative document making organ, and make clear the corresponding responsibility according to the difference of the specific illegal degree.On the other hand, if the error-correction authorities fail to perform their error-correcting duties according to law, they should be punished and their responsibilities clearly defined.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 歐愛民;;院校歧視的違法性分析與法治途徑[J];思想理論教育;2015年08期

2 溫輝;;政府規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年01期

3 李云霖;;論人大監(jiān)督規(guī)范性文件之審查基準(zhǔn)[J];政治與法律;2014年12期

4 王鍇;;論規(guī)范性文件的備案審查[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年11期

5 張娟;;完善地方人大常委會(huì)對(duì)規(guī)范性文件備案制度的法律思考[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2009年02期

6 王世貴;;規(guī)范性文件備案審查的范圍、內(nèi)容和程序[J];人大研究;2010年03期

7 王秀哲;;公民啟動(dòng)違憲審查的法律困境與制度完善[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期

8 李煒煒;;潛在沖突與制度完善——淺論規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度的缺陷與完善[J];人大研究;2009年01期

9 羅建明;;規(guī)范性文件備案審查的若干思考[J];人大研究;2008年08期

10 盧建華;;我國(guó)規(guī)范性文件備案審查地方立法的若干缺陷及其完善[J];行政論壇;2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 江澎濤;論行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 盧鈺晗;行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2015年

2 劉潔心;行政規(guī)范性文件制定問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[D];安徽大學(xué);2014年

3 顏敏;我國(guó)規(guī)范性文件違憲的實(shí)證分析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1705132