本文選題：行政許可　切入點：信息公開　出處：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：行政許可信息公開是有關(guān)行政許可活動的設(shè)定、實施以及監(jiān)管信息的對外公布行為。信息公開有助于普通民眾對掌握有大量行政審批事項的行政機關(guān)進行有效的監(jiān)督,避免“暗箱操作”、“權(quán)錢交易”的出現(xiàn),進而鏟除腐敗的溫床。另一方面,服務(wù)型政府、法治政府的構(gòu)建也需要打造一個公開透明的政務(wù)環(huán)境,其與行政許可信息公開有著內(nèi)在的價值契合性。行政許可的設(shè)定應(yīng)予公開,許可申請條件、依據(jù)、數(shù)量、程序、期限、實施結(jié)果以及監(jiān)督檢查信息亦應(yīng)進行公開。無論是依職權(quán)還是依中請公開,民眾知曉許可信息是行政許可在法治框架內(nèi)正常有序開展的關(guān)鍵一步。為規(guī)范許可信息的公開流程以及保障公民信息知情權(quán),《行政許可法》、《政府信息公開條例》相繼出臺,政務(wù)公開得到前所未有的重視。但同時囿于立法技術(shù)上的缺陷,上述有關(guān)信息公開的立法規(guī)范尚存在諸多不足:行政許可過程性信息界定不清,監(jiān)督檢查信息公開力度不足以及信息公開的監(jiān)督與救濟機制不健全等問題的存在都嚴重制約著許可信息公開實效。本文以行政許可信息公開為切入點,在對國內(nèi)學者現(xiàn)有理論成果文獻資料進行收集整合基礎(chǔ)之上,對比國外立法與實踐經(jīng)驗,將行政許可信息在廣義的角度下界定為有關(guān)行政許可的設(shè)定、實施與監(jiān)管信息;突破以往單純依照《政府信息公開條例》第2條將其僅僅限定為在行政機關(guān)履職過程中制作或者獲取的,并以一定形式保存、記錄之信息的傳統(tǒng)認知。鑒于信息公開實踐在該領(lǐng)域所暴露出的問題,首先從行政許可審批過程入手,將該過程之中伴隨產(chǎn)生的相關(guān)行政信息嚴格區(qū)分為過程性與事實性信息,并區(qū)別對待,衡量是否予以公開。在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出通過立法途徑對行政機關(guān)信息自由裁量權(quán)進行限制的可行性建議。其次,為增強行政許可監(jiān)管信息的公開力度與深度,著力對其進行在公開及時和有效性方向的規(guī)范構(gòu)建,輔之以許可持有人強制信息披露機制的探索。同時,以擴大聽證適用范圍、擴寬聽證形式為主要路徑對行政許可聽證制度進行完善,突出其在許可信息公開工作中的積極作用。最后,正所謂“無救濟就無權(quán)利”,加強對行政許可信息公開的多方監(jiān)督和司法救濟力度對上述改進措施的到位落實意義重大。
[Abstract]:The disclosure of administrative license information is the act of setting up, implementing and supervising administrative licensing activities. The disclosure of information helps the ordinary people to effectively supervise the administrative organs that have a large number of administrative examination and approval items. To avoid the emergence of "black box operation" and "power and money trading", and then to eradicate the hotbed of corruption. On the other hand, the construction of service-oriented government and rule of law government also needs to create an open and transparent government environment. The establishment of the administrative license shall be made public, the conditions, the basis, the quantity, the procedure and the time limit of the application for the license shall be made public. The results of the implementation as well as the information on supervision and inspection should also be made public. Whether ex officio or in accordance with China, Public awareness of licensing information is a key step in the normal and orderly development of administrative licensing within the framework of the rule of law. In order to standardize the open process of licensing information and to protect citizens' right to know about it, the Administrative Licensing Law and the regulations on the publicity of Government Information have been promulgated one after another. However, due to the defects of the legislative technology, the above legislative norms of information disclosure still have many shortcomings: the definition of the process information of administrative license is not clear, The lack of supervision and inspection information disclosure and the unsound supervision and remedy mechanism of the information disclosure seriously restrict the effectiveness of the license information disclosure. This paper takes the administrative license information disclosure as the starting point. On the basis of collecting and integrating the literature of domestic scholars' existing theoretical achievements, compared with foreign legislation and practical experience, the administrative license information is defined as the information about the establishment, implementation and supervision of administrative license in a broad sense. Breakthrough in the past, simply according to section 2 of the "regulations on the publicity of Government Information", which was limited to production or acquisition in the course of carrying out the duties of an administrative organ, and preserved in a certain form, The traditional cognition of recorded information. In view of the problems exposed in the practice of information disclosure in this field, first of all, starting with the process of examination and approval of administrative licensing, the relevant administrative information produced in the process is strictly divided into procedural and factual information. On the basis of this, the author puts forward some feasible suggestions to limit the discretion of information of administrative organs through legislative channels. Secondly, in order to enhance the openness and depth of administrative license supervision information, Focusing on its normative construction in the direction of openness, timeliness and effectiveness, supplemented by a probe into the compulsory disclosure mechanism of information by licensees. At the same time, in order to expand the scope of application of the hearing, Broadening the hearing form is the main way to perfect the administrative license hearing system and highlight its positive role in the work of license information disclosure. As the so-called "no remedy means no right", it is of great significance to strengthen the multi-party supervision and judicial relief for the administrative license information publicity.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 秦小建;;政府信息公開的憲法邏輯[J];中國法學;2016年03期

2 高秦偉;;行政許可與政府規(guī)制影響分析制度的建構(gòu)[J];政治與法律;2015年09期

3 潘麗霞;陳伯禮;張冠華;;裁量控制視角下的行政許可評價制度研究[J];中國行政管理;2015年03期

4 徐繼敏;;國務(wù)院設(shè)定行政許可實踐研究[J];行政法學研究;2015年01期

5 王太高;;論行政許可中止[J];法學;2014年04期

6 徐曉明;;行政許可后續(xù)監(jiān)管體系中的違法行為記分制度研究——兼論行政累犯制度之構(gòu)建[J];浙江社會科學;2014年04期

7 Colin Scott;石肖雪;;作為規(guī)制與治理工具的行政許可[J];法學研究;2014年02期

8 王克穩(wěn);;論變更、撤回行政許可的限制與補償[J];南京社會科學;2014年01期

9 沈壽文;;行政許可性質(zhì)之憲法學反思[J];云南行政學院學報;2013年01期

10 曾潔雯;;我國行政許可后續(xù)監(jiān)管法律問題探析[J];行政與法;2012年05期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張煒;論我國行政許可權(quán)法律規(guī)制的完善[D];湖南師范大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1608996