本文關(guān)鍵詞： 行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行 行政非訴執(zhí)行 行政決定　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2012年1月1日我國《行政強(qiáng)制法》正式開始施行,本法第2條規(guī)定我國行政強(qiáng)制分為行政強(qiáng)制措施與行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行,而行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行又可以分為兩種方式：一是有行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行權(quán)的行政機(jī)關(guān)自行執(zhí)行的方式；二是沒有行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行權(quán)的行政機(jī)關(guān)申請(qǐng)人民法院執(zhí)行的方式。其中,我國將行政機(jī)關(guān)申請(qǐng)人民法院執(zhí)行的方式稱之為行政非訴執(zhí)行或非訴行政執(zhí)行。行政非訴執(zhí)行作為我國行政管理中非常重要的組成部分,創(chuàng)建于改革開放初期,該執(zhí)行方式雖然經(jīng)歷了近三十年的發(fā)展,但由于該執(zhí)行方式在設(shè)立初期缺乏理論上的支撐,運(yùn)行過程中又缺少程序?qū)ζ溥M(jìn)行規(guī)范,從而致使其在實(shí)際應(yīng)用中仍然存在比較多的問題。 在本文中,筆者首先通過對(duì)學(xué)者們的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析和總結(jié),從而對(duì)我國行政非訴執(zhí)行的概念、特征和性質(zhì)提出自己的觀點(diǎn)；然后對(duì)行政非訴執(zhí)中存在的法理依據(jù)進(jìn)行闡述,這部分主要是對(duì)分權(quán)制衡、權(quán)利救濟(jì)和人權(quán)保障三大理論在行政非訴執(zhí)行中發(fā)揮的作用進(jìn)行歸納與總結(jié)；接著筆者在對(duì)我國相關(guān)案例和法律進(jìn)行分析后,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國行政非訴執(zhí)行存在人民法院審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不明晰、對(duì)行政相對(duì)人的救濟(jì)不足和行政非訴執(zhí)行和解混亂等問題；最后在借鑒國外行政非訴行實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)和整理諸多學(xué)者理論的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國的《行政強(qiáng)制法》,筆者提出了設(shè)立執(zhí)行聽證制度、增加對(duì)行政相對(duì)人的救濟(jì)措施和有限引入執(zhí)行和解等舉措,以期能夠使我國行政非訴執(zhí)行得以完善,進(jìn)而達(dá)到保護(hù)行政相對(duì)人合法權(quán)益和防止權(quán)力濫用的目的。
[Abstract]:In January 1st 2012, the Administrative compulsory Law of our country came into force. Article 2 of this Law stipulates that administrative compulsion is divided into administrative coercive measures and administrative enforcement. And the administrative enforcement can be divided into two ways: one is the way that the administrative organ with the administrative enforcement power executes itself; the other is the way that the administrative organ without the administrative enforcement power applies to the people's court for execution. In our country, the way that administrative organs apply to people's courts for execution is called administrative non-action execution or non-litigation administrative execution. As a very important part of our country's administration, administrative non-litigation execution was established in the early stage of reform and opening up. Although the execution mode has been developing for nearly 30 years, it lacks theoretical support at the initial stage of its establishment, and lacks the program to regulate it during its operation. As a result, there are still many problems in practical application. In this paper, the author first analyzes and summarizes the views of scholars, and then puts forward his own views on the concept, characteristics and nature of administrative non-litigation enforcement in China, and then expounds the legal basis of administrative non-litigation enforcement. This part is mainly to sum up and summarize the functions of the three theories of separation of powers and checks and balances, rights relief and human rights protection in the implementation of administrative non-litigation; then the author analyzes the relevant cases and laws of our country. It is found that the standard of people's court examination is not clear, the relief to administrative counterpart is insufficient, and the administrative non-lawsuit enforcement is confused. Finally, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign administrative non-litigation practice experience and sorting out many scholars' theories, combined with our country's "Administrative compulsory Law", the author puts forward the establishment of executive hearing system. We should increase the relief measures to the administrative counterpart and introduce some measures such as executive reconciliation, so as to perfect the administrative non-litigation execution in our country, and then to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and to prevent the abuse of power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林木揚(yáng);;論非訴行政執(zhí)行的路徑選擇[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年32期

2 楊朝程;錢昕;;關(guān)于行政非訴執(zhí)行案件和解情況的分析——以基層法院相關(guān)調(diào)查為據(jù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年31期

3 莊天逸;;論行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行的法律救濟(jì)[J];河北法學(xué);2008年08期

4 劉穎;;行政公正與效率關(guān)系之探析[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 姬亞平;行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行模式研究及選擇[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2004年09期

6 沈開舉;王紅建;;試論行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行權(quán)的分配模式[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

7 張承安;韓軼明;;非訴行政執(zhí)行制度的多向度審思[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2013年02期

8 劉宏成;;論我國行政公訴制度的構(gòu)建[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年07期

9 伊海燕;;行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行制度與立法構(gòu)想[J];長江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2013年05期

10 戴薇;;《行政強(qiáng)制法》實(shí)施后我國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行的適用問題[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1504158