【摘要】：正2014年6月23日,最高人民法院在發(fā)布的27號指導案例——臧進泉等盜竊、詐騙案中表述:"行為人利用信息網(wǎng)絡,誘騙他人點擊虛假鏈接而實際通過預先植入的計算機程序竊取財物構(gòu)成犯罪的,以盜竊罪定罪處罰;虛構(gòu)可供交易的商品或者服務,欺騙他人點擊付款鏈接而騙取財物構(gòu)成犯罪的,以詐騙罪定罪處罰。"最高人民法院在裁判理由中從主要手段和處分意識兩方面區(qū)分盜竊罪與詐騙罪。盜竊罪的主要手段是秘密竊取,被害人沒有
[Abstract]:On June 23, 2014, the Supreme people's Court stated in a case of theft and fraud such as Zang Jinquan, the 27 guidance case issued by the Supreme people's Court: "the perpetrator made use of the information network," Whoever deceives others to click on a false link and actually steals property through a pre-implanted computer program constitutes a crime and shall be convicted and punished with the crime of larceny; Anyone who makes up a commodity or service that can be traded and deceives another person by clicking on a payment link and deceives property constitutes a crime and shall be convicted and punished by the crime of fraud. " The Supreme people's Court distinguishes between larceny and fraud from two aspects: main means and punishment consciousness. The main means of theft is secret theft, the victim did not
【作者單位】： 清華大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 吳東穎;電信網(wǎng)絡詐騙案件中詐騙與盜竊的區(qū)分[D];廣西大學;2017年

2 張雪嬌;詐騙罪與民事欺詐的界限[D];鄭州大學;2017年

，

本文編號：2413564