【摘要】：有研究表明我國企業(yè)總數(shù)30%的國企獲得70%銀行貸款,這也促使了民間借貸的實(shí)際發(fā)展。民間借貸在滿足中小民營(yíng)企業(yè)的資金需求上確實(shí)起到了相當(dāng)?shù)淖饔?但隨著這種資金往來逐漸繁榮,也促使了相關(guān)的經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件數(shù)量大幅增加。2015年最高法院的工作報(bào)告顯示,全國法院新收集資詐騙罪案件同比上升48.83%,而非法吸收公眾存款罪案件同比上升127.38%。應(yīng)用法學(xué)嚴(yán)厲的刑罰帶來的實(shí)踐效果卻并不盡如人意,非法集資類案件依然層出不窮,且犯罪規(guī)模、數(shù)額等日漸擴(kuò)大。而實(shí)踐中如此嚴(yán)厲的懲處,本罪也被理論法學(xué)界一些學(xué)者詬病為口袋條款。本文將以延邊國貿(mào)非法吸收公眾存款案為研究起點(diǎn),通過詳細(xì)分析本罪的構(gòu)成犯罪的各個(gè)要件,結(jié)合本案的判決和實(shí)際的案情分析,探尋、研究司法實(shí)踐中認(rèn)定本罪的焦點(diǎn):"社會(huì)公眾"、"向社會(huì)公開宣傳"、"擾亂金融秩序"等問題。本罪法益為金融機(jī)構(gòu)存貸款管理秩序,而內(nèi)在隱含就是以貨幣為載體的國家信用,銀行正是此金融管理秩序信用的具體實(shí)施者,正是由于銀行間接融資的職能對(duì)于國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的巨大影響,才需要對(duì)于本罪法益進(jìn)行最為嚴(yán)苛刑法規(guī)制的保護(hù)。結(jié)合延邊國貿(mào)案認(rèn)定本罪的典型性,以尋求分析本罪的法益,即社會(huì)危害性具體如何。通過案件促進(jìn)對(duì)理論的認(rèn)識(shí),從法理學(xué)、解釋學(xué)的角度對(duì)本罪的深入分析,解釋其犯罪的構(gòu)成,從而厘清其法條中各個(gè)概念,提出指導(dǎo)認(rèn)定本案的可行性建議。重新思考延邊國貿(mào)案件判決的合理性,結(jié)合對(duì)本罪的法益的理解,以理論指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐中的司法認(rèn)定,期以有類似案件的普遍指導(dǎo)意義。本文主要分四章,第一章首先介紹研究方向的目的、意義以及研究方法。第二章介紹非法吸收公眾存款罪的法規(guī)條文及司法解釋;延邊國貿(mào)案件的基本信息和案情,通過對(duì)本案的審訊筆錄和判決書等資料的研究,比對(duì)法庭中的控辯雙方的觀點(diǎn)和理由,總結(jié)案件焦點(diǎn)。第三章對(duì)于案件問題在理論上予以闡釋,比較本罪的客觀、主觀要件與本罪規(guī)定之法益的異同,系統(tǒng)分析本罪社會(huì)危害性。依據(jù)法益分析本罪,對(duì)相關(guān)概念進(jìn)一步釋義,運(yùn)用刑法的相關(guān)理論結(jié)合延邊國貿(mào)案的具體情況,詳細(xì)分析、厘定延邊國貿(mào)案認(rèn)定本罪的要素�？剂勘景妇唧w情節(jié),運(yùn)用理論結(jié)合實(shí)踐的方法,思考本案判決的其它可能性,本罪在現(xiàn)行刑法體系的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,結(jié)合延邊國貿(mào)案的實(shí)際案情,本文認(rèn)為被告辯稱無罪的理由不能成立,但由于新司法解釋的頒布,或許有適用減輕情形的可能。第四章通過本案的警示作用,以融資刑法規(guī)避為視角,提出相應(yīng)的融資建議。
[Abstract]:Some studies show that 30% of the total number of enterprises in our country get 70% of bank loans, which also promotes the development of private lending. Private lending has indeed played a significant role in meeting the capital needs of small and medium-sized private enterprises, but as this kind of capital flow has gradually flourished, The report of the Supreme Court in 2015 showed that the number of new cases of fraud collected by the national courts increased 48.83 percent from a year earlier, while the number of cases of illegal taking in public deposits rose 127.38 percent from the same period last year. The practice effect brought by the severe punishment of law is not satisfactory, the illegal fund-raising cases still emerge in endlessly, and the scale and amount of the crime are expanding day by day. In practice, this crime has been criticized as pocket clause by some scholars in the field of theory and law. This article will take the Yanbian International Trade illegal absorption public deposit case as the research starting point, through the detailed analysis this crime constitutes the crime each element, unifies the case judgment and the actual case analysis, explores, This paper studies the focus of this crime in judicial practice: "the public", "publicity to the public", "disturbing the financial order" and so on. The legal interest of this crime is the order of deposit and loan management of financial institutions, and the inherent implication is the state credit with currency as the carrier, and the bank is the concrete executor of the credit of this financial management order. It is because the function of indirect financing of banks has a great impact on the national economy that it is necessary to protect the legal interests of this crime with the strictest criminal law regulation. Combined with Yanbian International Trade case to identify the typical nature of this crime in order to seek to analyze the legal interests of this crime, that is, the specific harm to society. Through the case to promote the understanding of theory, from the perspective of jurisprudence, hermeneutics of the in-depth analysis of the crime, explain the composition of its crime, so as to clarify the various concepts in its law, and put forward feasible suggestions to guide and identify this case. Rethinking the rationality of the judgment of Yanbian International Trade case, combining with the understanding of the legal interests of this crime, using theory to guide the judicial determination in practice, there is a general guiding significance of similar cases. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the purpose, significance and research methods of the research direction. The second chapter introduces the legal provisions and judicial interpretation of the crime of illegally absorbing deposits from the public. The basic information and case of Yanbian International Trade case, through the study of the trial record and judgment of this case, compare the views and reasons of the prosecution and the defense in the court, and summarize the focus of the case. The third chapter explains the case in theory, compares the objective of the crime, the subjective elements and the legal benefits of this crime, and systematically analyzes the social harmfulness of the crime. According to the analysis of legal interests of this crime, further interpretation of the relevant concepts, the use of the relevant theory of criminal law combined with the specific circumstances of Yanbian International Trade case, detailed analysis, determine the Yanbian International Trade case to determine the elements of this crime. Considering the specific circumstances of the case, using the method of combining theory with practice, thinking about the other possibilities of the judgment of this case, the practical significance of this crime in the current criminal law system, and combining the actual case of the Yanbian International Trade case, This paper holds that the defendant's argument of innocence cannot be established, but with the promulgation of the new judicial interpretation, it may be possible to apply the mitigating circumstances. Chapter four, through the warning function of this case, puts forward the corresponding financing suggestions from the angle of financing criminal law evasion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊暉,王偉;談非法吸收公眾存款案[J];河南公安學(xué)刊;1998年06期

2 王東升;;非法吸收公眾存款 東城法院順利審結(jié)[J];法庭內(nèi)外;2013年02期

3 岳宗;13.5億元鑄就的鐐銬——廣東張長(zhǎng)立特大非法吸收公眾存款案寫真[J];檢察風(fēng)云(法制新聞月刊);2000年06期

4 王鑫;論非法吸收公眾存款犯罪案件的特點(diǎn)及偵查對(duì)策[J];河北法學(xué);2001年05期

5 呂戈;杜軍濤;劉俊輝;袁芳;;一起非法吸收公眾存款案的警示[J];西部金融;2007年07期

6 董福慶;;非法吸收公眾存款犯罪初探[J];遼寧警專學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

7 毅梅生;;當(dāng)心,為籌資金而以存款名義向公眾借錢也構(gòu)成犯罪[J];生意通;2010年03期

8 劉媛媛;;論非法吸收公眾存款罪的認(rèn)定——以民間融資和非法吸收公眾存款的區(qū)分為基礎(chǔ)[J];浙江金融;2010年11期

9 張伶;;非法吸收公眾存款案件偵查方略——以一起典型案例為視角[J];中國刑事警察;2010年02期

10 劉為波;;非法吸收公眾存款與內(nèi)部集資的區(qū)分[J];中國審判;2011年07期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 張蕓;楊少萍;;論非法吸收公眾存款犯罪的治理[A];中國犯罪學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第十八屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集（中冊(cè)）[C];2009年

2 毛祖劍;;淺談商業(yè)銀行信用卡業(yè)務(wù)的不足及完善[A];中國民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 胡曉梅;全省法院審結(jié)8件非法吸收公眾存款犯罪案[N];河北經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 杜文;企業(yè)非法吸收公眾存款“僥幸”不得[N];中國企業(yè)報(bào);2007年

3 河南省淅川縣 爾豪;非法吸收公眾存款現(xiàn)象呈現(xiàn)新特點(diǎn)[N];農(nóng)民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

4 江蘇省泰州市人民檢察院 侯建東;非法吸收公眾存款不應(yīng)限于公開形式[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

5 李浣;非法吸收公眾存款犯罪猖獗[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 梁棟;對(duì)曹某非法吸收公眾存款案的評(píng)析[N];人民公安報(bào);2014年

7 竇力邋記者 臺(tái)建林;墓地也成增值項(xiàng)目吸來上億公眾存款[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

8 周遠(yuǎn);省法院公布3起非法吸收公眾存款案[N];河北日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

9 陸威;非法吸收公眾存款近7億[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

10 張勁;重慶偵破非法吸收公眾存款案[N];人民公安報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 范晨莉;非法吸收公眾存款罪的認(rèn)定[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

2 李新磊;溫州立人集團(tuán)非法吸收公眾存款案法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

3 王魯峰;非法吸收公眾存款罪的限制適用[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

4 喻向前;非法吸收公眾存款罪的認(rèn)定與處罰[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

5 馬鳳;非法吸收公眾存款罪認(rèn)定實(shí)證研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

6 劉林強(qiáng);非法吸收公眾存款罪若干問題研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2016年

7 武學(xué)文;論非法吸收公眾存款罪[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2016年

8 季華峰;非法吸收公眾存款罪若干問題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

9 黃珀;TZ公司、陳某非法吸收公眾存款案評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

10 桂逢忠;非法吸收公眾存款罪的犯罪構(gòu)成研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2371468