生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪的認(rèn)定
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-10 18:03
【摘要】：近年來,我國食品安全事件頻發(fā)。從國人皆知的蘇丹紅事件開始,到后來的瘦肉精事件、影響惡劣的毒奶粉事件、與每個人的生活都息息相關(guān)的地溝油事件等。這些被廣泛群體食用的食品的安全問題使人們不得不繃緊了神經(jīng),因為這類問題的存在嚴(yán)重威脅到了人的身體健康甚至生命,影響極其惡劣。鑒于此,在食品安全犯罪盛行的關(guān)鍵時刻于2011年開始實施的《刑法修正案(八)》在食品安全方面本著對食品安全犯罪從嚴(yán)處罰的宗旨,通過并開始實施,它將本罪進(jìn)行了修改,在這個修正案中,將本罪的最低法定刑由原來的拘役或者五年以下有期徒刑修改為五年以下有期徒刑,對犯罪刑罰的加重是給行為人實施心理壓力的一劑猛藥。修改后的條文使懲處食品安全犯罪有據(jù)可循。我的這篇論文就以社會對生活質(zhì)量愈加追求為前提,政策對食品安全問題逐漸重視為背景,研究食品安全犯罪中最核心的罪名——生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪。 文章主要運(yùn)用個案研究法以及類比分析法,在文獻(xiàn)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,在選定案例后,針對這個特定對象加以分析,找出這個特定對象存在的個別問題及與其他相關(guān)案例的共性,通過他人對爭議案件的分析和論證以及其在司法實踐中的認(rèn)定和操作,表明本人對爭議案件的觀點(diǎn)。運(yùn)用歸納演繹、抽象概括、分析綜合等思維方法。在通過對幾則案例的分析后,使得對本罪名的認(rèn)定問題有更明確的認(rèn)識,最終達(dá)到在司法實踐中能更自如的運(yùn)用的目的。 文章圍繞生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪在司法實踐中的認(rèn)定問題,通過相關(guān)案例,對其有關(guān)概念進(jìn)行分析來認(rèn)定罪與非罪。通過分析本罪與其他相關(guān)罪名的區(qū)別,實現(xiàn)在司法實踐中正確選擇適用。另外,文章還通過具體案例研究了關(guān)于本罪爭議最多的問題,即本罪的犯罪形態(tài)問題。最后,文章對并沒有以典型的犯罪形式在日常中呈現(xiàn)的非典型性生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪進(jìn)行了研究。通過對以上四個方面的分析,更透徹地理解本罪的內(nèi)容以及適用,也呼吁社會加強(qiáng)對食品安全問題的重視。
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety incidents occur frequently in China. From the Sudan Red incident, which is well known to the Chinese, to the lean meatloin incident, the bad tainted milk powder incident, and the gutter oil incident, which is closely related to everyone's life, and so on. The safety problems of these foods consumed by a wide range of people have forced people to tighten their nerves because the existence of such problems seriously threatens the health and even lives of people and has an extremely bad effect. In view of this, the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII), which began to be implemented in 2011 at a critical time when food safety crimes were prevalent, was adopted and implemented in the context of food safety with the aim of imposing severe penalties for food safety crimes, In this amendment, the minimum legal penalty for this crime has been amended from the original criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years to not more than five years of fixed-term imprisonment. The aggravation of criminal penalty is a powerful medicine to put psychological pressure into effect. The amended provisions make it possible to punish food safety crimes. My thesis is based on the social pursuit of quality of life, the policy of food safety issues for the background, the study of food safety crime in the core of the charge-production, sale of toxic, harmful food crimes. This article mainly uses the case study method and the analogy analysis method, on the basis of the literature research, after selecting the case, analyzes the specific object, finds out the individual problems existing in this particular object and the commonness with other related cases. Through other people's analysis and demonstration to the dispute case and its cognizance and operation in the judicial practice, this paper shows my opinion on the dispute case. Use inductive deduction, abstract generalization, analysis synthesis and other thinking methods. Through the analysis of several cases, it makes the identification of this crime more clear understanding, and finally can be more freely used in the judicial practice. This paper focuses on the identification of the crime of production, sale of poisonous and harmful food in judicial practice, through the relevant cases, analyzes its related concepts to determine the crime and non-crime. By analyzing the difference between this crime and other related charges, we can choose and apply correctly in judicial practice. In addition, the article also through specific cases to study the most controversial issues about the crime, that is, the form of crime. Finally, the article studies the crime of atypical production, sale of poisonous and harmful food which does not appear in the typical form of crime. Through the above four aspects of analysis, a more thorough understanding of the content of the crime and its application, but also called on the community to pay more attention to food safety.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2370988
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety incidents occur frequently in China. From the Sudan Red incident, which is well known to the Chinese, to the lean meatloin incident, the bad tainted milk powder incident, and the gutter oil incident, which is closely related to everyone's life, and so on. The safety problems of these foods consumed by a wide range of people have forced people to tighten their nerves because the existence of such problems seriously threatens the health and even lives of people and has an extremely bad effect. In view of this, the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII), which began to be implemented in 2011 at a critical time when food safety crimes were prevalent, was adopted and implemented in the context of food safety with the aim of imposing severe penalties for food safety crimes, In this amendment, the minimum legal penalty for this crime has been amended from the original criminal detention or fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years to not more than five years of fixed-term imprisonment. The aggravation of criminal penalty is a powerful medicine to put psychological pressure into effect. The amended provisions make it possible to punish food safety crimes. My thesis is based on the social pursuit of quality of life, the policy of food safety issues for the background, the study of food safety crime in the core of the charge-production, sale of toxic, harmful food crimes. This article mainly uses the case study method and the analogy analysis method, on the basis of the literature research, after selecting the case, analyzes the specific object, finds out the individual problems existing in this particular object and the commonness with other related cases. Through other people's analysis and demonstration to the dispute case and its cognizance and operation in the judicial practice, this paper shows my opinion on the dispute case. Use inductive deduction, abstract generalization, analysis synthesis and other thinking methods. Through the analysis of several cases, it makes the identification of this crime more clear understanding, and finally can be more freely used in the judicial practice. This paper focuses on the identification of the crime of production, sale of poisonous and harmful food in judicial practice, through the relevant cases, analyzes its related concepts to determine the crime and non-crime. By analyzing the difference between this crime and other related charges, we can choose and apply correctly in judicial practice. In addition, the article also through specific cases to study the most controversial issues about the crime, that is, the form of crime. Finally, the article studies the crime of atypical production, sale of poisonous and harmful food which does not appear in the typical form of crime. Through the above four aspects of analysis, a more thorough understanding of the content of the crime and its application, but also called on the community to pay more attention to food safety.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李崧源;黃梅珍;;略論生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪的幾個問題[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年S2期
2 鮮鐵可;論危險犯概念與特征[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1995年04期
3 向本陽;生產(chǎn)銷售有毒有害食品罪若干問題探討[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報.社會公共安全研究;2002年04期
4 方明;略論生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒有害食品罪[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1994年02期
5 王玉玨;;《刑法》第144條中“有毒有害非食品原料”的合理定位——以近晚食品安全事件為例[J];法學(xué);2008年11期
6 趙小鳳;顧正;;危險犯的犯罪形態(tài)分析[J];法制與社會;2008年29期
7 劉愛童;生產(chǎn)銷售有毒有害食品罪概念淺析[J];湖北公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;1998年04期
8 陳洪兵;;生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪的成立與中止[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年05期
9 李瑩;;《刑法修正案(八)》中生產(chǎn)、銷售有毒、有害食品罪法理解析[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2011年03期
10 羅開卷;;危害食品安全犯罪中的罪名關(guān)系及選擇[J];人民司法;2012年09期
，本文編號：2370988
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2370988.html
教材專著
