【摘要】：我國經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房政策的提出,其本意是為那些買不起商品房的社會弱勢群體提供援助。然而近年來,多地出現(xiàn)了騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的案件。騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的行為嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了國家的社會公共福利制度、公私財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益以及他人所享有的福利資格,甚至?xí)L社會不良風(fēng)氣,滋生其他犯罪,危及社會的穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展,危害極大。因此,當(dāng)務(wù)之急是對這些騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行刑事規(guī)制,運(yùn)用法律手段來控制類似事件的再次發(fā)生。 在本文中,筆者將通過四個部分展開論述： 第一部分,通過對騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房現(xiàn)象典型案件的考察,總結(jié)司法實(shí)踐中處理此類現(xiàn)象的多樣化措施；通過對理論爭議的梳理,發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)今學(xué)界對騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的行為能否定罪存在很多分歧。探究以刑法視角研究騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房現(xiàn)象的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 第二部分,通過對騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房行為定性問題的理論考察,對不定罪說、定詐騙罪說、另設(shè)罪名說等各觀點(diǎn)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行審視、分析和總結(jié)。對于騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的行為入罪依然需要在理論依據(jù)及立法技術(shù)上進(jìn)一步探討。 第三部分,論述騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的行為應(yīng)當(dāng)入罪的具體理由�；谒痉▽�(shí)踐的需要、刑事政策的考量,結(jié)合刑法理論中犯罪本質(zhì)的要求,從長遠(yuǎn)考慮包括騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房在內(nèi)的騙取社會公共福利行為對整個社會保障制度的侵害,通過分析國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)行法律的相關(guān)規(guī)定,以此透視包括騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房在內(nèi)的騙取社會公共福利行為在刑法上的相關(guān)問題。 第四部分,對騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的行為入罪的設(shè)想。建議增設(shè)騙取社會公共福利罪。其中包括具體條文的設(shè)置,犯罪構(gòu)成的分析,刑罰的設(shè)置以及犯罪形態(tài)方面的分析。立足法制建設(shè)的長遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展,建議將一系列包括騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房在內(nèi)的騙取社會公共福利的行為統(tǒng)一運(yùn)用刑法進(jìn)行規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:Comfortable housing's policy is intended to provide assistance to vulnerable groups who can not afford commercial housing. However, in recent years, there have been many cases of buying comfortable housing. The act of cheating comfortable housing has seriously damaged the state's social and public welfare system, the rights and interests of public and private property, and the welfare qualifications enjoyed by others. It may even contribute to a bad social atmosphere, breed other crimes, and endanger the stability and development of society. The danger is great. Therefore, the urgent task is to regulate these phenomena of cheating comfortable housing and to control the recurrence of similar incidents by legal means. In this paper, the author will discuss through four parts: the first part, through the investigation of the typical cases of comfortable housing phenomenon, summarizes the diversification measures to deal with this phenomenon in judicial practice; By combing the theoretical controversy, it is found that there are many differences in the conviction of comfortable housing's behavior. To explore the practical significance of the phenomenon of cheating and buying comfortable housing from the angle of criminal law. The second part, through the theoretical investigation on the qualitative problem of comfortable housing's behavior, examines, analyzes and summarizes the content of various viewpoints, such as the theory of non-conviction, the conviction of fraud, the theory of separate charges, and so on. It still needs further discussion on the theoretical basis and legislative technology for the deceiving of comfortable housing. The third part discusses the specific reasons why the behavior of buying comfortable housing should be criminalized. On the basis of the needs of judicial practice, the consideration of criminal policy and the essence of crime in criminal law theory, from the long-term perspective, we consider the encroachment on the whole social security system caused by fraudulent social welfare behavior, including buying comfortable housing. By analyzing the relevant provisions of the existing laws at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the relevant problems in criminal law of cheating social and public welfare, including cheating comfortable housing. The fourth part, the assumption of deceiving comfortable housing's behavior. It is suggested that the crime of defrauding public welfare should be added. It includes the setting of specific provisions, the analysis of the constitution of the crime, the setting of penalty and the analysis of the form of the crime. Based on the long-term development of legal system construction, it is suggested that a series of deceptive behaviors including comfortable housing should be standardized by criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊濤;;用刑罰懲治騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的權(quán)貴[J];城市開發(fā);2007年11期

2 胡際蓮;洪詩鴻;;基于博弈視角的經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房騙購行為[J];東疆學(xué)刊;2011年02期

3 陰建峰;張巧娜;;騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房行為定性分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

4 湯勃;張炯;;國外住房保障制度之比較研究[J];法制與社會;2011年09期

5 楊濤;;從騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房看設(shè)立騙取公共福利罪[J];觀察與思考;2010年03期

6 王立杰 ,劉艷;社會保險(xiǎn)反欺詐對策與思考[J];山東勞動保障;2005年06期

7 康泰克;;保障房分配:逐利中亂象[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2012年16期

8 儲槐植,薛美琴;刑法謙抑——由一則建議稿引發(fā)的思考[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2005年03期

9 張慶立;;騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的刑法規(guī)制[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(法治論叢);2012年04期

10 胡霞;;騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房行為之刑法學(xué)思考[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 何姣;略論對騙取社會福利行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2208401