【摘要】：形式解釋論與實質(zhì)解釋論的分歧并非雙方論者所宣稱的那般不可調(diào)和。相反,兩派解釋論在解釋位階上具有一致性,解釋結論具有相似性。兩派的差異性表現(xiàn)為對法條文義范圍的理解不同,深層次的差異在于司法適用中刑事違法性與社會危害性原則優(yōu)先性選擇的立場不同�；鈨膳擅艿某雎吩谟诮嬈鹩晌牧x解釋向體系解釋再向目的解釋演進的路徑:在文義解釋中,可以將語義的范圍推向極致;在體系解釋中,應當協(xié)調(diào)好刑法與他法的關系、不同法條之間的關系以及同一法條內(nèi)部的關系;在目的解釋中,既要以保護法益作為刑法目的進行解釋,還應通過構建多方參與機制詮釋法條之規(guī)范目的。在解釋的盡頭,以人道主義補足解釋的缺陷,實現(xiàn)合法性與正當性關系的協(xié)調(diào)。
[Abstract]:The differences between formal interpretation and substantive interpretation are not as irreconcilable as commentators on both sides claim. On the contrary, the two hermeneutics are consistent in interpretation order and similar in interpretation conclusion. The differences between the two schools are manifested in the different understanding of the scope of the text of the law. The deep difference lies in the different positions of the criminal illegality and the priority choice of the social harmfulness principle in the judicial application. The way to resolve the contradiction between the two schools is to construct a path from the interpretation of literary meaning to the interpretation of the system and then to the interpretation of the purpose: in the interpretation of literary meaning, the scope of semantics can be pushed to the extreme; in the interpretation of the system, the relationship between criminal law and other law should be well coordinated. The relationship between different articles of law and the relationship within the same article; in the purpose of interpretation, we should not only interpret the interests of protection law as the purpose of criminal law, but also interpret the normative purpose of the article through the construction of multi-party participation mechanism. At the end of interpretation, humanitarianism is used to complement the defects of interpretation and to coordinate the relationship between legitimacy and legitimacy.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學;
【基金】：上海市085工程“華東政法大學博士生海外訪學資金專項資助研究成果” 華東政法大學“優(yōu)秀博士論文專項培育成果”(項目編號:2017-1-005)
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 馮殿美;王琪;;刑法文義解釋方法論[J];山東警察學院學報;2009年01期

2 倪業(yè)群;;刑法文義解釋方法的位階及其運用[J];廣西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年02期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 吳樂;罪刑法定視域下實質(zhì)解釋與形式解釋之爭[D];西北大學;2016年

2 李超;論刑法的文義解釋[D];河北大學;2015年

3 蘇凱;刑法文義解釋研究[D];山東大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2177089