本文選題：風險社會 + 刑法變動��； 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：風險社會是人類社會進入后工業(yè)社會時代的一種社會背景,具有迥異于其他社會狀態(tài)的自身特點,影響著我們的世界觀和知識論。尤其在風險社會理論日益豐富的今天,法學理論的發(fā)展也潛移默化的受其影響,刑法學理論體系所發(fā)生的變動就是其中的生動體現(xiàn)。風險社會下的刑法變動不僅體現(xiàn)在刑法結構性轉(zhuǎn)變還體現(xiàn)在刑法中具體理論內(nèi)容的演變上,論文的視角選擇了在此背景下刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化理論所發(fā)生的變化,并注意到其二者因所生變化產(chǎn)生的博弈關系,進而透過對其二者的博弈解析來探討實現(xiàn)刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化博弈均衡的路徑選擇。論文主要采用文獻分析法,通過查看、閱讀、總結有關風險社會理論、刑法體系變動、刑法謙抑主義、犯罪化與非犯罪化理論等相關內(nèi)容,從中論證風險社會下刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的博弈關系,并提出實現(xiàn)二者博弈均衡的設想。論文除了第一章緒論和結論外,主體部分包含三章。緒論部分對課題來源、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進行梳理,并選取具有代表性的觀點分析其優(yōu)點和不足。第二章為風險社會與刑法變動概覽,主要研究了風險社會背景下的風險社會理論與刑法所生變動,為刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的博弈提供理論背景。對風險社會理論展開描述,探析風險社會的含義與特征,明確刑法變動的時代背景;探究刑法變動中刑法導向如何由自由刑法轉(zhuǎn)向預防刑法、安全刑法,澄清風險刑法、安全刑法、敵人刑法、愛的刑法等刑法觀念的不同內(nèi)涵以及這些概念如何變得流行;也對刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化理論如何產(chǎn)生動搖等內(nèi)容進行了闡釋。第三章刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化理論比較部分對刑法變動中刑法謙抑主義所生流變的背景、具體表現(xiàn)、風險回應進行了論述,從起源辯析、稱謂爭議、內(nèi)涵界定、體系共鳴四個方面對刑法謙抑主義詳細分析;對犯罪化理論所生流變的背景依據(jù)、理論反思、未來展望進行了分析,總結了犯罪化的理論含義、社會基礎、價值意義以及發(fā)展趨勢。第四章立足于博弈背景、博弈維度、博弈困境以及博弈均衡四個角度對刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的博弈關系進行解析。通過深入研究具體描繪風險社會的真實狀態(tài),并從風險社會所引起的廣泛影響領悟到的刑法所生變動中發(fā)現(xiàn)刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化顯露出相互博弈的關系,這種博弈關系的存在既有理論支撐亦有實踐證明。博弈主體分析、基本立場相反、價值悖論并存、博弈困境難題以及矛盾關系證偽構成了二者博弈的主要維度。這種博弈關系造成了自由與安全、人權保障與社會保護兩重價值悖論,使其陷入二律背反的緊張狀態(tài)。文章論證了刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化之間的博弈并非絕對互斥的矛盾,對其博弈關系模型進行大致判斷,發(fā)現(xiàn)二者完全可以達致“納什均衡”狀態(tài),并且論證了非犯罪化是二者實現(xiàn)博弈均衡的路徑選擇。非犯罪化是與犯罪化相生相克的產(chǎn)物,可以與犯罪化共生存在,非犯罪化限制過分犯罪化以保障人權不被戕害的終極目的及其理論基礎與謙抑主義有相同的內(nèi)在基理,這為實現(xiàn)風險社會中的刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化之間的博弈均衡提供了科學性、合理性的根據(jù)。本課題研究能夠推動刑法理論創(chuàng)新和實踐進步,通過描述風險社會下刑法確有結構性變動的客觀事實以及刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化存在的博弈關系,闡述如何實現(xiàn)刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的博弈均衡,以期為推動刑法理論的發(fā)展貢獻綿薄之力;厘清我國已進入風險社會的真實狀態(tài),辨清刑法變動下刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的演變,認清刑事立法中存在的犯罪化主導傾向及其不利后果,查清刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化之間的博弈關系,澄清實現(xiàn)二者博弈均衡的路徑。
[Abstract]:The risk society is a social background of the era of human society entering the post industrial society. It has its own characteristics which are different from other social states. It affects our world outlook and the theory of knowledge. Especially in today's increasingly rich theory of risk society, the development of the theory of law is also influenced by the potential of the theory of law, and the theory of criminal law has taken place. Change is a vivid embodiment. The change of criminal law in the risk society is reflected not only in the structural change of criminal law but also in the evolution of the specific theoretical content in the criminal law. The perspective of the thesis chooses the changes in the theory of modesty and criminalization in the context of this background, and attention to the game caused by the changes produced by the criminal law. Through the game analysis of the two, the paper discusses the path choice to realize the equilibrium between the modesty of criminal law and the criminal game. The paper mainly adopts the method of literature analysis to summarize the related content of the theory of risk society, the change of the criminal law system, the modesty of criminal law, the theory of criminalization and non criminalization through the literature analysis. The game relationship between criminal law modesty and criminalization under the risk society is proved and the idea of realizing the equilibrium of the two parties is put forward. In addition to the first chapter and the conclusion, the main part contains three chapters. The introduction part combs the source of the subject, the current research status at home and abroad, and selects the representative views to analyze its advantages and disadvantages. Second This chapter is a survey of the risk society and the change of criminal law. It mainly studies the theory of risk society and the change of criminal law under the background of risk society. It provides a theoretical background for the game of criminal law modesty and criminalization. It describes the theory of risk society, analyzes the meaning and characteristics of the risk society, and makes clear the background of the change of criminal law; and explores the criminal law. How the change of criminal law is directed from free criminal law to the prevention of criminal law, security penal code, clarification of risk criminal law, security penal code, the criminal law of the enemy, the criminal law of love and so on, and how these concepts become popular; and the third chapter of criminal law is explained. In comparison with the theory of modesty and criminalization, a detailed analysis of the background, concrete performance and risk response of criminal law modesty in the change of criminal law in the change of criminal law, from the four aspects of origin, appellation, connotation and system resonance, the detailed analysis of the modesty of criminal law; the background basis for the theory of criminalization and theoretical reflection The future prospect is analyzed, and the theoretical meaning of criminalization, social foundation, value meaning and development trend are summarized. The fourth chapter analyses the game relationship between the modesty and criminalization of criminal law based on the game background, game dimension, game dilemma and game equilibrium. Through in-depth study, the detailed description of the risk society is made. The existence of the criminal law modesty and criminalization reveals the relationship between the criminal law modesty and the criminalization, which has both theoretical support and practical proof. The game subject analyses, the basic field is opposite, the value paradox coexists, and the game dilemma is difficult and difficult. The falsification of the contradiction relationship constitutes the main dimension of the two party game. This game relationship causes the two values paradox of freedom and security, human rights protection and social protection, and makes it into the tension of the two law. The article demonstrates the game between the modesty and the criminalization of the criminal law and the contradiction between the non absolute mutual exclusion and the model of the game relationship. On the basis of general judgment, it is found that the two can reach the state of "Nash equilibrium" completely, and demonstrates that the non criminalization is the path choice for the two parties to realize the equilibrium of the game. The non criminalization is the product of the intergrowth with the criminalization, which can exist with the criminalization, and the ultimate goal of the non criminalization is to guarantee the human rights not to be killed. It has the same intrinsic rationale as its theoretical basis and modesty, which provides a scientific and reasonable basis for the equilibrium of the game equilibrium between criminal law modesty and criminalization in the risk society. This research can promote the innovation and practical progress of criminal law theory and practice, through the description of the structural changes in the criminal law under the risk society. View the fact and the game relationship between criminal law modesty and criminalization, explain how to realize the game equilibrium between criminal law modesty and criminalization, in order to contribute to promoting the development of criminal law theory; clarify the true state of China's entry into the risk society and identify the evolution of the modesty and criminalization of criminal law under the change of criminal law. In the criminal legislation of the Qing Dynasty, the dominant tendency and its adverse consequences exist in the criminal legislation, to find out the game relationship between the modesty of criminal law and the criminalization, and to clarify the path to achieve the equilibrium of the two parties.
【學位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳謙信;;中國刑法:犯罪化與非犯罪化[J];云南財貿(mào)學院學報(社會科學版);2008年01期

2 陳謙信;;犯罪化的任務與非犯罪化的使命[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2008年04期

3 毛玲玲;;犯罪化與非犯罪化的價值與邊界[J];華東政法大學學報;2011年04期

4 侯為大;;淺議我國的犯罪化與非犯罪化之路[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2013年09期

5 莫洪憲;馬東麗;;論犯罪化的程序性規(guī)制[J];湖北社會科學;2013年12期

6 殷成潔;論犯罪化與非犯罪化的融合[J];連云港職業(yè)技術學院學報(綜合版);2005年02期

7 戰(zhàn)立偉;;賭博的犯罪化與非犯罪化——兼論我國刑法對賭博的立場抉擇[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W校學報;2006年02期

8 叢林;;“同性強奸”的犯罪化研究[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2006年04期

9 汪維才;;論惡意逃廢債務行為的犯罪化[J];中國刑事法雜志;2006年01期

10 陳雨亭;;以賭博為業(yè)犯罪化之研究[J];湖南科技學院學報;2007年06期

相關會議論文 前2條

1 張凌;孟永恒;;犯罪化擴張論要[A];中國犯罪學年會論文集（2011年度）[C];2011年

2 褚宸舸;;“吸毒犯罪化”論的困境[A];第十屆全國藥物依賴性學術會議暨首屆中美藥物濫用和HIV/HCV共病專題研討會論文摘要匯編[C];2008年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 河南財經(jīng)政法大學 袁憶;犯罪化進程中刑事立法的審慎策略[N];光明日報;2013年

2 劉金林;刑事立法“犯罪化”還是“非犯罪化”[N];檢察日報;2007年

3 貴陽市南明區(qū)人民檢察院 秦致強;婚內(nèi)強制性性行為犯罪化初探[N];貴州民族報;2012年

4 重慶市人民檢察院、重慶市巴南區(qū)人民檢察院 熊皓 勾香華;非法持有爆炸物應予犯罪化[N];檢察日報;2013年

5 黑龍江大學法學院 徐楷;杜絕“惡意欠薪”,犯罪化未必是良方[N];檢察日報;2009年

6 斯瓦蘭·辛格　胡勇 (印度尼赫魯大學教授 斯瓦蘭·辛格);政治犯罪化與犯罪政治化[N];東方早報;2009年

7 本報記者　王比學;要不要增設“欠薪罪”[N];人民日報;2005年

8 孫萬懷 華東政法大學法律學院;反對違法交通行為的過度立法與司法犯罪化[N];中國社會科學報;2009年

9 游偉;論合理控制我國立法中的犯罪規(guī)模[N];人民法院報;2001年

10 上海市人民檢察院第一分院 曹堅;應謹慎對待地下錢莊犯罪化[N];上海金融報;2009年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 葉慧娟;《見危不助犯罪化的刑法邊緣性研究》[D];北京大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 陳瑤;我國刑法修正案中的犯罪化問題研究[D];河北師范大學;2011年

2 顧盈盈;論犯罪化的限制[D];華東政法學院;2006年

3 張辰斌;社會轉(zhuǎn)型與犯罪化[D];山西大學;2013年

4 劉丹;論違約行為犯罪化[D];四川師范大學;2015年

5 馬文瀟;襲警行為犯罪化立法研究[D];河北師范大學;2016年

6 蘭天;濫用毒品行為的犯罪化與非犯罪化比較研究[D];云南大學;2016年

7 杜文康;論風險社會下刑法謙抑主義與犯罪化的博弈[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學;2016年

8 魏周;民間高利貸司法犯罪化之分析[D];浙江大學;2016年

9 聶斌;對我國司法犯罪化的反思[D];華東政法大學;2011年

10 張曉騫;見危不助行為的犯罪化研究[D];四川大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1943182