本文選題：城管執(zhí)法 + 被害人過錯　； 參考：《河北經貿大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，，城管問題一直為大家所關注，本來城管與城市里靠三輪車維持生計的小商販是正常的管理者和被管理者的關系，現今卻逐漸演變成驅逐與逃跑、管理與生存的對立狀態(tài)。新聞媒體曝出的各種城管暴力執(zhí)法、不文明執(zhí)法的現象也層出不窮。這就不僅使城管披上了粗暴野蠻的形象，也使城市的流動小販置于生存的弱者地位。然而，社會輿論總是自然而然地傾向弱者，所以夏俊峰這個案子讓人不自覺地想到他是因為對城管粗暴執(zhí)法感到極端憤怒而做出的殺人行為。夏俊峰于2013年9月25日被注射死刑，他希望妻子張晶在他死后能為他繼續(xù)申訴，因為他直到被執(zhí)行死刑前還堅稱自己是正當防衛(wèi)。我們不得不說夏俊峰案是一個悲劇，這起案件不僅使夏俊峰失去了寶貴的生命，而且還給三個家庭帶去了揮之不去的傷痛。隨著夏俊峰死刑執(zhí)行的結束，這起案件背后隱藏的法理問題，如夏俊峰的行為是否構成故意殺人罪，是否構成正當防衛(wèi)，被害人是否對結果的發(fā)生有過錯及是否存在激情犯罪等問題值得我們更進一步的探討。 本論文由四大部分內容構成。第一部分是引言，具體介紹了本案的選題背景及意義、國內外研究現狀、研究方法與創(chuàng)新。簡單闡述了國內外對本案和城管執(zhí)法的研究情況，為下文的分析作了鋪墊。第二部分的內容是案情綜述，在介紹了基本案情和判決結果后，闡述了控辯雙方爭議的焦點，即被告人主觀方面問題、被害人是否有過錯、被害人是否有防衛(wèi)情節(jié)及在量刑上對夏俊峰適用死刑是否得當，這些影響著對本案的定罪。第三部分的內容是本案法理分析，分為兩個小節(jié)，第一小節(jié)是夏俊峰案定罪問題分析，其中包括：夏俊峰的行為是否構成故意殺人罪、是否構成正當防衛(wèi)；第二小節(jié)是夏俊峰案量刑問題分析，結合我國現行法律對量刑問題的規(guī)定探討被害人過錯是否能夠影響量刑及激情犯罪作為量刑情節(jié)的正當性問題。第四部分的內容是夏俊峰案的啟示，分為兩個小節(jié)，第一個小節(jié)是本案對司法的現實意義及有益借鑒，其中包括：有過錯能否對其正當防衛(wèi)、本案能否適用死刑及其對司法的啟示和對我國城管執(zhí)法的建議；第二個小節(jié)是對我國死刑量刑的現狀和改善的思考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the issue of urban management has always been the focus of attention. Originally, the relationship between urban management and small vendors in the city who depend on tricycles to earn a living is a normal relationship between the manager and the managed, but now it has gradually evolved into expulsion and escape. The opposite state of management and survival. News media exposure of various urban management violence law enforcement, uncivilized law enforcement phenomenon also emerge in endlessly. This not only put the city management on a rough and barbaric image, but also put the city's itinerant vendors in the position of the weak survival. However, public opinion tends naturally to the weak, so Xia Junfeng's case makes one unconsciously think of his murderous behavior as a result of extreme anger at the rough law enforcement of the chengguan. Xia Junfeng, who was shot to death on September 25, 2013, wants his wife, Zhang Jing, to continue to complain for him after his death, because he insisted he was defending himself until he was executed. We have to say that Xia Junfeng case is a tragedy. This case not only made Xia Junfeng lose his precious life, but also brought lingering pain to three families. With the end of Xia Junfeng's death sentence, there are hidden legal issues behind the case, such as whether Xia Junfeng's actions constitute intentional homicide and whether he constitutes justifiable defense. Whether the victim is at fault with the result and whether there is a crime of passion is worthy of further discussion. This thesis consists of four parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the background and significance of the topic, the current research situation, the research methods and innovations at home and abroad. This paper briefly describes the domestic and foreign research on this case and urban management law enforcement, which paves the way for the following analysis. The second part is the summary of the case. After introducing the basic case and the result of the judgment, the author expounds the focus of the dispute between the prosecution and the defense, that is, the subjective aspects of the defendant, whether the victim is at fault, Whether the victim has defensive circumstances and whether he applies the death penalty to Xia Junfeng in sentencing affects the conviction of this case. The third part is the legal analysis of the case, which is divided into two sections. The first section is the analysis of the conviction of Xia Junfeng, including: whether Xia Junfeng's behavior constitutes intentional homicide and self-defense; The second section is the case of Xia Junfeng sentencing analysis, combined with the current law of our country on sentencing provisions to explore whether the fault of the victim can affect sentencing and passion crime as the justification of sentencing circumstances. The fourth part is the revelation of Xia Junfeng case, which is divided into two sections. The first section is the practical significance of the case to the judiciary and useful reference, including: whether there is fault to its legitimate defense, Whether the death penalty can be applied in this case and its enlightenment to the administration of justice and the suggestions to the law enforcement of chengguan in our country; the second section is about the present situation and improvement of sentencing of death penalty in our country.
【學位授予單位】：河北經貿大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 田慶生;郝如建;;被害人過錯的司法適用[J];產業(yè)與科技論壇;2007年11期

2 李亞丹;;淺析城管與小商販沖突的根源及解決之道[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年01期

3 任志中;汪敏;;被害人過錯與死刑適用[J];法律適用;2009年01期

4 林亞剛;袁雪;;酌定量刑情節(jié)若干問題研究[J];法學評論;2008年06期

5 夏勇;;解讀中外“激情犯罪”——“藥家鑫殺人案”引出的話題[J];法學;2011年05期

6 梅文娟;;論被害人過錯的量刑意義[J];法制與經濟(中旬刊);2010年11期

7 李玉萍;;量刑與社會調查報告[J];法制資訊;2008年06期

8 張曉亮;李希;;淺析被害人過錯對量刑的影響[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

9 趙廷光;;論“電腦量刑”的基本原理[J];湖北警官學院學報;2007年02期

10 郭子賢;激情犯罪探析[J];湖湘論壇;2005年06期

本文編號：1882956