本文選題：未成年人 + 刑事責(zé)任年齡�。� 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡問(wèn)題是一個(gè)隨著國(guó)家的進(jìn)步和發(fā)展越來(lái)越引起民眾關(guān)注的問(wèn)題。因?yàn)榻陙?lái)未成年人實(shí)施惡性行為而導(dǎo)致犯罪的數(shù)目越來(lái)越多且情節(jié)越來(lái)越惡劣,致使社會(huì)民眾對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象及問(wèn)題的關(guān)心程度越來(lái)越高。隨著未成年人犯罪的低齡化現(xiàn)象日益明顯,未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)是否應(yīng)當(dāng)降低也成為了一個(gè)爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)。本文通過(guò)案例的介紹、對(duì)于未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)是否應(yīng)當(dāng)降低學(xué)界存在的各種爭(zhēng)議及學(xué)說(shuō)的介紹,闡述了筆者對(duì)于未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)不宜降低的觀點(diǎn)以及相應(yīng)的理由同時(shí)提出了為進(jìn)一步完善相應(yīng)制度可以采取的措施。第一章,提出問(wèn)題。通過(guò)趙力寶案、湖南邵東女教師被三學(xué)生劫殺案、廣西石橋村三姐弟被殺案以及覃某殺人肢解案提出本文的研究問(wèn)題,即未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)是否該當(dāng)降低。第二章,我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)的爭(zhēng)議及評(píng)析。我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)是否應(yīng)當(dāng)降低在學(xué)界存在著爭(zhēng)議,分別是降低說(shuō)、不變說(shuō)、提高說(shuō)和彈性說(shuō)。降低說(shuō)認(rèn)為未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)應(yīng)當(dāng)降低以適應(yīng)當(dāng)前社會(huì)的發(fā)展。不變說(shuō)認(rèn)為未成年人自身并沒(méi)有因?yàn)槲镔|(zhì)條件的變好而達(dá)到相應(yīng)的成熟程度,同時(shí)社會(huì)和學(xué)校等對(duì)未成年人走向犯罪有不可逃避的責(zé)任,未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡的變動(dòng)是社會(huì)不負(fù)責(zé)任的表現(xiàn)。提高說(shuō)認(rèn)為為了加大對(duì)未成年人的保護(hù),刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)應(yīng)當(dāng)提高。彈性說(shuō)則認(rèn)為對(duì)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡的規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)在14周歲左右上下浮動(dòng)6個(gè)月。第三章,我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)不宜降低。筆者對(duì)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)是否應(yīng)當(dāng)降低這一問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了自己的探索和研究。首先,從理論方面對(duì)國(guó)際法、古今中外有關(guān)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡的規(guī)定以及刑事責(zé)任年齡的劃分等方面進(jìn)行探究;其次,通過(guò)對(duì)中國(guó)社會(huì)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了探索并提出由于目前判斷未成年人成熟的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)尚不明確、相關(guān)法律制度構(gòu)建不全面以及未成年人犯罪相關(guān)處罰措施不健全,得出我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡不宜降低。第四章,我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡制度應(yīng)對(duì)措施�；谏鐣�(huì)現(xiàn)狀我國(guó)未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡不宜降低但應(yīng)當(dāng)采取相應(yīng)的措施以完善未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡制度,筆者據(jù)此提出了完善相對(duì)負(fù)刑事責(zé)任年齡制度、建立健全少年司法制度、完善保安處分措施、建立強(qiáng)制親職制度、采用前科消滅制度以及充分利用和發(fā)展社區(qū)矯正制度等措施。
[Abstract]:The age of juvenile criminal responsibility is a problem that attracts more and more attention with the progress and development of our country. In recent years, the number of crimes committed by minors has become more and more serious, which makes the public pay more and more attention to this phenomenon and problems. With the phenomenon of juvenile delinquency becoming increasingly obvious, whether the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility should be lowered has become the focus of debate. In this paper, through the introduction of cases, whether the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility should reduce the academic controversy and the introduction of the theory, This paper expounds the author's point of view that the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility should not be lowered and the corresponding reasons and puts forward the measures that can be taken to further perfect the corresponding system. The first chapter, put forward the question. Through the case of Zhao Libao, the case of Hunan Shaodong female teacher being robbed and killed by three students, the case of the killing of three sisters and brothers in Shiqiao Village in Guangxi and the case of Qin Mou's murder and dismemberment, the author puts forward the research question in this paper, that is, whether the starting point of juvenile's criminal responsibility should be lowered. The second chapter, our country minor criminal responsibility age starting point dispute and the appraisal. Whether the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility in China should be lowered is controversial in academic circles, namely, the theory of lowering, the theory of invariance, the theory of improvement and the theory of flexibility. According to the theory, the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility should be lowered in order to adapt to the development of current society. The same holds that minors themselves have not reached a corresponding level of maturity due to the improvement of material conditions. At the same time, society and schools have an unavoidable responsibility for minors to commit crimes. The change of juvenile's age of criminal responsibility is the manifestation of social irresponsibility. In order to enhance the protection of minors, the starting point of criminal responsibility should be raised. Flexibility says that the age of criminal responsibility for minors should fluctuate around 14 years of age for 6 months. The third chapter, our country minor criminal responsibility age starting point should not be lowered. The author explores and studies whether the starting point of juvenile criminal responsibility should be reduced. First of all, from the theoretical aspects of international law, ancient and modern Chinese and foreign provisions on the age of criminal responsibility of minors and the division of the age of criminal responsibility, and so on; secondly, This paper explores the current situation of Chinese society and points out that the standards for judging the maturity of minors are not clear, the relevant legal system is not comprehensive, and the punishment measures related to juvenile delinquency are not perfect. Come to our country minor criminal responsibility age should not be lowered. The fourth chapter, our country minor criminal responsibility age system countermeasure. Based on the current social situation, the age of criminal responsibility of minors in China should not be lowered, but corresponding measures should be taken to perfect the age system of criminal responsibility of minors. Based on this, the author puts forward to perfect the age system of relative criminal responsibility. Such measures as establishing and perfecting juvenile justice system, perfecting security measures, establishing compulsory paternity system, adopting the system of elimination of criminal record and making full use of and developing community correction system, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張寒玉;王英;;應(yīng)對(duì)未成年人犯罪低齡化問(wèn)題之制度建構(gòu)與完善[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2016年01期

2 林清紅;;未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡起點(diǎn)不宜降低[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2016年01期

3 周雄;;收容教養(yǎng)制度研究——刑法第十七條第四款之展開(kāi)[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2015年02期

4 盛長(zhǎng)富;許春霞;;未成年人刑事責(zé)任年齡制度——基于相關(guān)國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則的分析[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

5 王曉松;劉立杰;;論我國(guó)少年刑法的立法改革與完善[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2014年05期

6 姚建龍;;轉(zhuǎn)型社會(huì)的青少年犯罪控制——以“全國(guó)重點(diǎn)青少年群體教育幫助和預(yù)防犯罪試點(diǎn)”為例的研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年04期

7 張先昌;劉新媛;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法中老齡犯罪寬宥的考察[J];法學(xué);2011年11期

8 趙秉志;袁彬;;我國(guó)未成年人犯罪刑事立法的發(fā)展與完善[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2010年03期

9 鐘俊;林曉梅;;論犯罪低齡化與刑事責(zé)任年齡制度改革[J];山西青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

10 彭新林;;中國(guó)前科消滅制度構(gòu)建論綱[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 盛長(zhǎng)富;未成年人刑事司法國(guó)際準(zhǔn)則研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 趙芷藝;幼兒園親職教育的行動(dòng)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2015年

2 劉勝;刑事責(zé)任年齡制度研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2011年

3 金磊;試論我國(guó)最低刑事責(zé)任年齡的降低[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

4 高佳;論我國(guó)未成年犯罪人處遇制度[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

5 李靜;刑事責(zé)任年齡制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1875086