本文選題：刑法因果關(guān)系 + 介入因素　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：因果關(guān)系理論不僅是刑法總論部分的難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題，同時(shí)也是古老而常新的爭(zhēng)論熱點(diǎn)，而介入因素下的刑法因果關(guān)系理論，，則是其中的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。研究刑法因果關(guān)系的最終目的是為了準(zhǔn)確地定罪量刑，以回應(yīng)罪刑相適應(yīng)的刑法原則，從而真正地實(shí)現(xiàn)司法上的公平正義。在實(shí)行行為直接導(dǎo)致危害結(jié)果發(fā)生的單一因果關(guān)系案件中，司法工作人員可以準(zhǔn)確地判定行為人應(yīng)承擔(dān)的刑事責(zé)任，但在司法實(shí)踐中，單一因果關(guān)系的案件是非常少的，經(jīng)常會(huì)介入被害人自己的行為、自然事件、第三人的行為或是行為人的二次行為，從而使案件復(fù)雜化。在整個(gè)刑法因果關(guān)系理論發(fā)展的過(guò)程中，刑法學(xué)者對(duì)因果關(guān)系主張的觀點(diǎn)更是眾說(shuō)紛紜，莫衷一是，比較有代表性的學(xué)說(shuō)有大陸法系的條件說(shuō)、原因說(shuō)、相當(dāng)因果關(guān)系說(shuō)、客觀歸責(zé)理論，英美法系的法律因果關(guān)系說(shuō)以及我國(guó)的必然因果關(guān)系說(shuō)和偶然因果關(guān)系說(shuō)。因?yàn)榕卸▽?shí)行行為與危害結(jié)果之間是否存在因果關(guān)系的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較混亂，至今沒(méi)有科學(xué)統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐中“多因一果”的案件很難得到準(zhǔn)確的把握。由于世界各國(guó)對(duì)刑法因果關(guān)系的理論研究還不夠完備，我國(guó)也在的爭(zhēng)論中不斷借鑒和吸收國(guó)外的理論研究成果以完備我國(guó)的理論體系，所以，介入因素下的刑法因果關(guān)系問(wèn)題還有很大的研究空間。本文試圖通過(guò)司法實(shí)踐中包含介入被害人自身特殊體質(zhì)、被害人自身行為、第三人的行為、自然因素的三個(gè)典型案件，從介入因素下因果關(guān)系的概念和特征入手，梳理介入因素下刑法因果關(guān)系判定的若干學(xué)說(shuō)，從而整理出一套可以作為司法實(shí)務(wù)中處理介入因素下刑法因果關(guān)系案件的參考思路，并結(jié)合介入因素下刑法因果關(guān)系的考量因素分析司法實(shí)踐中的三個(gè)典型案件。最后對(duì)處理司法實(shí)務(wù)中介入因素下刑法因果關(guān)系的案件提出完善建議，以期在豐富的學(xué)術(shù)研究的同時(shí)，對(duì)司法實(shí)務(wù)中的準(zhǔn)確定罪量刑提供判斷參考，實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正。
[Abstract]:The theory of causality is not only a difficult problem in the general part of criminal law, but also an old and often new hot point of argument, and the theory of causality in criminal law under the intervention factor is the focal point. The ultimate purpose of studying the causality of criminal law is to accurately convict and sentence, in order to respond to the principle of criminal law adapted to crime and punishment, so as to realize justice and justice in judicature. In the case of single causality, the judicial staff can accurately determine the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, but in judicial practice, the case of single causality is very few. It is often involved in the victim's own behavior, natural event, the third party's behavior or the actor's secondary behavior, thus complicating the case. In the course of the development of the theory of causality in criminal law, scholars of criminal law have different views on causation. There are different opinions on causality. The more representative theories are the condition theory of continental law system, the reason theory, and the theory of causation. The theory of objective imputation, the theory of legal causality in Anglo-American law system, the theory of inevitable causality and the theory of accidental causation in our country. Because the criterion of deciding whether there is causality between the practice behavior and the harmful result is confused, so far there is no scientific unified standard, so it is very difficult to accurately grasp the case of "multiple cause and effect" in the judicial practice. As the theoretical research on causality of criminal law in the world is not complete enough, our country is constantly drawing lessons from and absorbing foreign theoretical research results in the controversy in order to complete the theoretical system of our country. There is still a lot of room for research on the causality of criminal law under the intervention factors. This article attempts to involve the victim's own special constitution, the victim's own behavior, the third party's behavior, the natural factor's three typical cases in the judicial practice, starts with the concept and the characteristic of causality under the intervention factor. Combing some theories of causality judgment in criminal law under intervention factors, the author collates a set of reference ideas which can be used in judicial practice to deal with cases of criminal causality under intervening factors. Combined with the factors of causality in criminal law, the author analyzes three typical cases in judicial practice. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the cases of causality in criminal law under the intervention factors in judicial practice, in order to provide judgment and reference to the accurate conviction and sentencing in judicial practice while enriching academic research, and to realize judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王守萍;;介入情況下的刑法因果關(guān)系[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(西部論壇);2008年S1期

2 馮建軍;;論判斷刑法因果關(guān)系的公式[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 盧笑宇;;從哲學(xué)中的因果關(guān)系到刑法學(xué)中的因果關(guān)系——以兩個(gè)刑法案例為切入點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年03期

4 龔樹強(qiáng);;刑法中因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年13期

5 康均心,王雨田;刑法因果關(guān)系與刑事責(zé)任[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

6 范文雪;;論刑法因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定方式[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年09期

7 范小軍;;對(duì)體質(zhì)特異人傷害的法律責(zé)任分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年16期

8 郭偉;;大陸法系刑法因果關(guān)系論的巡歷——兼論我國(guó)相關(guān)理論的發(fā)展[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

9 劉明;張偉珂;;介入因素下的刑法因果關(guān)系[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

10 章建明;英美刑法雙層次原因理論研究[J];景德鎮(zhèn)高專學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

本文編號(hào)：1837620