本文選題：編造傳播 + 虛假信息��； 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以來,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的迅速發(fā)展帶動(dòng)了一大批新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的出現(xiàn),互聯(lián)網(wǎng)已經(jīng)觸及到我們生活的方方面面,信息傳播速度的加快、范圍的擴(kuò)大將人們的生活逐漸變得越來越透明,我們的生活也隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的出現(xiàn)而變得更加便利。據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì),我國網(wǎng)民達(dá)到了 6. 8億,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)普及率達(dá)到了 60%以上,可想而知,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)人們的生活影響巨大。與此同時(shí),一些人利用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)實(shí)施侮辱誹謗他人行為,嚴(yán)重?cái)_亂社會(huì)秩序,侵犯他人合法權(quán)益,造成了嚴(yán)重危害社會(huì)的后果。為了維護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益和良好的社會(huì)秩序,2013年9月9日最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院出臺(tái)了《關(guān)于辦理利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)施誹謗等刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》,明確將所有在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上編造、傳播虛假信息的行為依照尋釁滋事罪的規(guī)定定罪處罰。該解釋的出臺(tái),為司法機(jī)關(guān)打擊網(wǎng)絡(luò)編造、傳播虛假信息行為提供了統(tǒng)一的法律標(biāo)尺,但卻也引起了刑法理論界的爭議,部分學(xué)者對(duì)該解釋的合理性甚至合法性都提出了很大質(zhì)疑。為此,2015年8月,全國人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)通過了《刑法修正案(九)》,將在信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)或其他媒體上編造、故意傳播虛假的險(xiǎn)情、疫情、警情、災(zāi)情信息的行為新設(shè)編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪予以規(guī)制�！缎谭ㄐ拚�(九)》中的編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪是剛剛確定的罪名,我國關(guān)于編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪的研究也基本上處于比較淺顯的狀態(tài),本文將以上述司法解釋和刑法修正案的具體規(guī)定為出發(fā)點(diǎn),對(duì)編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪的概念進(jìn)行解讀,結(jié)合司法實(shí)務(wù)界的相關(guān)案例,對(duì)編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪以及尋釁滋事罪的犯罪構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行了深入分析,并對(duì)該罪在實(shí)踐當(dāng)中存在的問題進(jìn)行分析,提出了進(jìn)一步完善編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪合理建議,以期對(duì)司法實(shí)踐能夠有所幫助。本論文共分四個(gè)部分:引言部分主要介紹了選題的背景及意義、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究方法、創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)與不足。第一部分,編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪概述。首先,對(duì)編造故意傳播虛假信息罪的立法進(jìn)程進(jìn)行了回顧,以及《刑法修正案(九)》在審議過程中所遇到的問題,其次,對(duì)該罪的特征、類型進(jìn)行分析,再次,根據(jù)已有案件對(duì)編造故意傳播虛假信息的危害進(jìn)行分析,最后,對(duì)于設(shè)立該罪的必要性進(jìn)行了闡述。第二部分,編造、故意傳播虛假信息犯罪的犯罪構(gòu)成。首先,分析了該罪犯罪構(gòu)成中的客體;其次,對(duì)本罪客觀方面中“編造”和“傳播”行為進(jìn)行了分析,闡述了二者之間的關(guān)系,區(qū)分了二者關(guān)系存在的三種不同的類型,并對(duì)“虛假的險(xiǎn)情、災(zāi)情、疫情、警情”進(jìn)行了認(rèn)定,分析了編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪傳播的媒介;第三,對(duì)該罪的主體主觀方面進(jìn)行分析,明確了成立該罪的主觀方面為直接故意,但該罪不屬于目的犯,并說明了理由。第三部分,編造、傳播虛假信息罪的認(rèn)定。首先,分析了編造、故意傳播虛假信息行為和行使言論自由的界限。其次,對(duì)理論界熱議的尋釁滋事罪與本罪進(jìn)行了比較分析。第三,對(duì)本罪與編造、傳播虛假恐怖信息罪、敲詐勒索罪進(jìn)行比較,明確司法實(shí)踐對(duì)該罪定罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的把握。第四部分,編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪的完善措施。首先,刑法與其他法律的銜接,由于該罪是在信息技術(shù)發(fā)達(dá)的時(shí)代背景下制定,因此,解決好與之前相關(guān)法律的銜接問題十分重要。其次,罪名設(shè)置的問題,編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪應(yīng)是選擇性罪名,所以行人的行為無論是觸犯了哪一個(gè)罪名,該罪都應(yīng)該成立。再次,討論了罪數(shù)問題的適用。最后,對(duì)刑法關(guān)于規(guī)制編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪進(jìn)行再思考。
[Abstract]:Since the twenty-first Century, the rapid development of the Internet has led to the emergence of a large number of new industries. The Internet has touched all aspects of our life. The speed of information dissemination is speeding up, and the expansion of the scope has gradually become more and more transparent, and our life has become more convenient with the emergence of the Internet. Internet users in China have reached 680 million and the Internet popularity has reached more than 60%. It is conceivable that the Internet has a great impact on people's lives. At the same time, some people use the Internet to insult and defamed others' behavior, seriously disrupt the social order, infringe the legitimate rights and interests of others, and cause serious harm to the society. In order to safeguard citizens The legal rights and interests and good social order, the Supreme People's court in September 9, 2013, the Supreme People's Procuratorate promulgated the interpretation of several issues concerning the application of law in criminal cases such as the use of information network for defamation of defamation and other criminal cases, and clearly made up all the acts on the network and disseminating false information in accordance with the provisions of the crime of provocation. The introduction of this interpretation provides a unified legal ruler for the judicial organs to combat network fabrication and disseminate false information, but it has also caused controversy in the theoretical circles of the criminal law. Some scholars have questioned the reasonableness and even legality of the interpretation. In August 2015, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress passed the "penalty". The law amendment (nine) > will be made up in the information network or other media, intentionally disseminating false danger, epidemic situation, police situation, the behavior of the information of the disaster situation, the crime of deliberately spreading false information to be regulated. < criminal law amendment (nine) >), the crime of deliberately spreading false information is a newly established crime, and our country is about to make up and deliberately spread the false information. The research on the crime of false information is also basically in a comparatively shallow state. This article will take the above-mentioned judicial interpretation and the specific provisions of the criminal law amendment as the starting point, interpret the concept of the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false information, and combine the relevant cases of the judicial practice to make up, disseminate the crime of false information and commit the offense of provocation. The constitutive requirements of the crime are analyzed in depth, and the problems existing in the crime are analyzed, and the reasonable suggestions are put forward to further perfect the creation and intentionally disseminate false information, so as to help the judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts: the introduction part mainly introduces the background and significance of the topic, research status and research. The first part is a review of the legislative process of making the crime of deliberately disseminating false information, and the problems encountered in the process of the revision of the criminal law amendment (nine). Secondly, the characteristics and types of the crime are analyzed, and again, according to the existing cases. To make an analysis of the harm of deliberately spreading false information. Finally, the necessity of establishing the crime is expounded. The second part, making up, intentionally disseminating the criminal constitution of false information crime. First, the object of the crime is analyzed. Secondly, the analysis of the "fabricating" and "spreading" in the objective aspect of the crime is analyzed. This paper describes the relationship between the two, distinguishes three different types of the relationship between the two, and identifies the "false danger, the disaster, the epidemic situation, the police situation", and analyzes the media for the dissemination of the crime of falsely disseminating the crime of false information. Third, the subjective aspects of the crime are analyzed, and the subjective aspects of the crime are clearly defined as direct. Intentional, but this crime does not belong to the purpose offense, and explains the reason. The third part, the crime of fabricating and disseminating false information. First, it analyses the limits of making up, deliberately spreading false information and exercising the freedom of speech. Secondly, a comparative analysis is made to the crime of provocation and the crime of provocation in the theoretical circles. Third, the crime and the creation and the spread of the crime are spread. The crime of false terrorist information, the crime of extortion is compared, and the judicial practice is clear about the conviction standard of the crime. The fourth part is the perfect measure for the crime of deliberately spreading false information. First, the connection between the criminal law and other laws, because the crime is formulated in the background of the advanced information technology, therefore, the relevant laws are solved well. The problem of cohesion is very important. Secondly, the crime of setting up a crime, making up the crime of deliberately spreading false information should be a selective crime, so that the behavior of pedestrians should be established no matter which crime is offended. Again, the application of the number of crimes is discussed. Finally, the criminal law is Rethought on the crime of regulating and making the false information. Exam.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 哈書菊;張淇;;新媒體下的虛假信息犯罪[J];知與行;2016年05期

2 趙秉志;徐文文;;論我國編造、傳播虛假信息的刑法規(guī)制[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年05期

3 孫萬懷;盧恒飛;;刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)理性應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言——對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠司法解釋的實(shí)證評(píng)估[J];法學(xué);2013年11期

4 胡靈;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論監(jiān)督的法律邊界[J];法學(xué)論壇;2010年05期

5 秦明華;編造虛假恐怖信息罪若干問題探析[J];犯罪研究;2005年02期

6 王立民;反恐立法述評(píng)[J];犯罪研究;2003年01期

7 童偉華;論恐怖主義犯罪的界定[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 曾濤;論編造、故意傳播虛假信息罪中的編造、故意傳播虛假信息行為[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

2 陶奕安;網(wǎng)絡(luò)編造、傳播虛假信息行為的刑法適用[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 李婷;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛假信息的刑法規(guī)制[D];中央民族大學(xué);2016年

4 謝凱;虛假信息刑法規(guī)制的具體路徑解析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

5 周玉;編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪淺析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

6 劉文武;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由的限制[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1803573