本文選題：財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益 + 合同種類　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：合同屬于民法上的概念,強(qiáng)迫他人簽訂的合同,違背當(dāng)事人真實(shí)意思,在民法上是可撤銷合同。當(dāng)強(qiáng)迫簽訂合同的行為侵犯被害人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)和人身權(quán)的程度超過(guò)了民法規(guī)制的范圍,民法已經(jīng)不能使被害人的權(quán)益受到有效保護(hù),則需要刑法發(fā)揮其保護(hù)法益、懲罰犯罪的功能。但是,合同債權(quán)不是具體的財(cái)物,是一種財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益,財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益是否為財(cái)產(chǎn)型犯罪之對(duì)象在刑法學(xué)界存在爭(zhēng)議,我國(guó)刑法也沒(méi)有將財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益納入侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)罪一章的財(cái)產(chǎn)的范圍,這不利于在日益多樣的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中保護(hù)人民的合法權(quán)益,也不利于對(duì)侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的犯罪人正確地定罪量刑。所以,從具體的案例入手,對(duì)強(qiáng)迫他人簽訂合同并實(shí)現(xiàn)合同“權(quán)利”的行為進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確地定性,是十分必要的。經(jīng)過(guò)分析可知,合同的內(nèi)容及種類、強(qiáng)迫行為的程度、實(shí)現(xiàn)合同“權(quán)利”的行為對(duì)象和方式這三個(gè)因素影響行為定性。所以,行為定性應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的思路是:首先,分析作為合同內(nèi)容的財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益是否為財(cái)產(chǎn)型犯罪的對(duì)象以明確行為是否具有違法性。其次,研究強(qiáng)迫行為的程度以判斷罪名、犯罪的停止形態(tài)及罪數(shù)形態(tài)。最后,分析實(shí)現(xiàn)合同“權(quán)利”的行為對(duì)象和方式以確定罪數(shù)形態(tài)。厘清了行為定性思路的基礎(chǔ)上,再對(duì)合同的內(nèi)容及種類、強(qiáng)迫行為的程度、實(shí)現(xiàn)合同“權(quán)利”的行為對(duì)象和方式進(jìn)行具體認(rèn)定,將其作為行為定性的理論依據(jù),從而認(rèn)定強(qiáng)迫他人簽訂合同并實(shí)現(xiàn)合同“權(quán)利”行為的性質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Contract belongs to the concept of civil law, forcing others to sign a contract, contrary to the true will of the parties, is a revocable contract in civil law. When the forced signing of a contract infringes upon the victim's property rights and personal rights beyond the scope of the civil law, the civil law can no longer effectively protect the rights and interests of the victims, so it is necessary for the criminal law to play its role in protecting the interests of the protection law and punishing the crime. However, the contractual creditor's right is not a specific property, but a kind of property interest. Whether the property interest is the object of the property crime is controversial in the field of criminal law. China's criminal law also does not include property interests in the scope of property in the chapter on crimes against property, which is not conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the people in increasingly diverse social and economic activities. It is also unfavorable to the criminal who infringes the property interests to be convicted and sentenced correctly. Therefore, it is necessary to define accurately the behavior of forcing others to sign contracts and realize their "rights" from concrete cases. Through the analysis, we can know that the content and type of contract, the degree of compulsive behavior, the object and mode of realizing contract "right" affect the qualitative behavior. Therefore, the thinking of behavior characterization should be followed: first, analyze whether the property interest as the content of the contract is the object of the property-type crime to make clear whether the behavior has the illegality or not. Secondly, the author studies the degree of compulsion to judge the crime, the form of crime cessation and the form of crime number. Finally, the author analyzes the object and mode of realizing the contract right to determine the crime number. On the basis of clarifying the qualitative thinking of behavior, the content and type of the contract, the degree of compulsive behavior, the object and the way of realizing the "right" of the contract are specifically identified, which is regarded as the theoretical basis for the characterization of the act. The nature of the act of forcing others to sign a contract and realizing the "right" of the contract is determined.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳燁;;財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的刑事立法完善探析[J];石河子大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

2 劉辰遠(yuǎn);;詐騙財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益犯罪完成形態(tài)研究——以借據(jù)作為詐騙對(duì)象為例[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

3 郭小亮;朱煒;;盜竊后處分財(cái)物行為的刑法評(píng)價(jià)——基于不可罰的事后行為之考察[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2014年03期

4 林亞剛;;搶劫罪暴力的再考察——以司法適用為視角[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2013年01期

5 陳燁;;刑法中的財(cái)產(chǎn)分類再研究[J];政治與法律;2013年01期

6 張紅昌;;搶劫罪中的財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益探究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年07期

7 江學(xué);張博穎;;論普通搶劫罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

8 賈學(xué)勝;;事后不可罰行為研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年05期

9 馬衛(wèi)軍;;論搶劫罪中的財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益[J];政治與法律;2011年07期

10 王駿;;搶劫、盜竊利益行為探究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 孫悅s，

本文編號(hào)：1783594