本文選題：驅(qū)逐出境 + 刑法規(guī)制�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑法中的驅(qū)逐出境是指將犯罪的外國人強(qiáng)行逐出我國領(lǐng)土之外的刑罰方式。驅(qū)逐含有強(qiáng)制之意，，“境”在刑法語境中被理解為我國大陸邊境較為合適。驅(qū)逐出境的本質(zhì)在于剝奪外國人在我國的居留權(quán)。刑法中的驅(qū)逐出境與行政法中的驅(qū)逐出境容易混淆，但存在法律依據(jù)、適用范圍、適用理由、決定主體、適用程序、法律救濟(jì)六個(gè)方面的差異。驅(qū)逐出境在我國刑罰體系中既是一種附加刑，也是一種資格刑。 我國《刑法》第35條規(guī)定：“對(duì)于犯罪的外國人，可以獨(dú)立適用或者附加適用驅(qū)逐出境�！背酥猓覈鴽]有其他相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)和司法解釋對(duì)驅(qū)逐出境刑罰措施作出具體、細(xì)致的規(guī)定。法律條文簡單粗疏，經(jīng)總結(jié)歸納，刑法中驅(qū)逐出境制度在設(shè)置上存在以下不足：在實(shí)體上，適用對(duì)象不明確、適用范圍模糊、適用條件不確定、人權(quán)保護(hù)不足；在程序上，未規(guī)定適用期限、執(zhí)行程序模糊、執(zhí)行時(shí)限不確定、救濟(jì)保障不到位。 針對(duì)這些不足，應(yīng)該從以下方面對(duì)刑法中的驅(qū)逐出境制度進(jìn)行完善：在實(shí)體上，明確其適用對(duì)象、劃分其適用范圍、確定其適用方式、完善人權(quán)保護(hù)內(nèi)容；在程序上，規(guī)定其適用期限、明確具體執(zhí)行過程、確定執(zhí)行時(shí)限、增設(shè)救濟(jì)保障措施。以期刑法中的驅(qū)逐出境制度在司法實(shí)踐中更加具有可操作性，更好地服務(wù)于社會(huì)管理工作。
[Abstract]:The expulsion from the criminal law refers to the penalty of forcible expulsion of the foreigner from the territory of our country.Expulsion means compulsion, and "boundary" is understood as the mainland border in the context of criminal law.The essence of expulsion is to deprive foreigners of their right of abode in our country.Expulsion in criminal law is easily confused with expulsion in administrative law, but there are six differences in legal basis, scope of application, reasons for application, subject of decision, procedure of application and legal remedy.Deportation is not only a supplementary penalty but also a qualification penalty in the penalty system of our country.Article 35 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates that "expulsion from the country may be applied independently or in addition to an alien who commits a crime."In addition, China does not have other relevant laws and regulations and judicial interpretation of deportation penalty measures made specific, detailed provisions.The legal provisions are simple and careless. After summing up and summing up, the expulsion system in the criminal law has the following shortcomings: in the entity, the object of application is not clear, the scope of application is vague, the applicable conditions are uncertain, the human rights protection is insufficient; in the procedure,No applicable time limit, vague execution procedure, uncertain execution time limit and inadequate relief guarantee.In view of these shortcomings, we should perfect the expulsion system in the criminal law from the following aspects: in the entity, clear its applicable object, divide its applicable scope, determine its application mode, perfect the content of human rights protection, in the procedure,Define the time limit of its application, define the concrete execution process, determine the time limit of execution, and add relief measures.It is expected that the expulsion system in criminal law is more operable in judicial practice and serves the social management better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李好好;;被驅(qū)逐者的人權(quán)保護(hù)問題研究——以“關(guān)于保護(hù)被驅(qū)逐者人權(quán)的修訂條款草案”為視角[J];安陽工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

2 劉杰偉;對(duì)巴基斯坦人納扎爾七次非法入境的思考[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

3 劉杰偉;從納扎爾七次非法入境引發(fā)的思考[J];北京人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

4 方波;;對(duì)外國被告人處以非監(jiān)禁刑問題探討[J];山東審判;2013年02期

5 趙春瑋;朱斌斌;;行政性驅(qū)逐出境制度研究[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

6 徐翠萍;涉外刑事審判原則及程序初探[J];刑偵研究;1999年05期

本文編號(hào)：1755105