本文選題：非法集資 + 借貸合同　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：非法集資案件復(fù)雜,有擔(dān)保的非法集資案則更為復(fù)雜。擔(dān)保人責(zé)任的承擔(dān),既與民事責(zé)任有關(guān),又與刑事責(zé)任相連,如何處理已成為了大眾關(guān)注的焦點,同時也很有爭議。本文共分為四個部分。第一部分是關(guān)于擔(dān)保與非法集資之關(guān)系的探討。我國近幾年來非法集資案多發(fā)頻發(fā),情況復(fù)雜,大多有擔(dān)保人作擔(dān)保,處理起來不僅有難度,而且很有爭議,如何處理非法集資中的擔(dān)保糾紛,是處理非法集資案無法回避的問題。第二部分是關(guān)于非法集資案中借貸合同的效力認(rèn)定。通過對非法集資罪的不同類型進行探析,將非法集資中涉及的借貸合同按民間借貸合同或集資借款合同分別進行效力認(rèn)定。非法集資中借款合同有效的觀點欠缺有效性,非法集資涉及的集資借款合同應(yīng)認(rèn)定為無效。第三部分是關(guān)于非法集資中擔(dān)保合同效力的認(rèn)定。集資擔(dān)保合同作為非法集資的從合同因為主合同無效而自然喪失效力。在這種情況下,擔(dān)保人是否需要承擔(dān)擔(dān)保責(zé)任?承擔(dān)什么責(zé)任?本人認(rèn)為擔(dān)保人承擔(dān)的責(zé)任應(yīng)屬于賠償責(zé)任,是締約過失責(zé)任。第四部分是關(guān)于非法集資情形下?lián)Ｈ说臋?quán)益救濟。非法集資中擔(dān)保人承擔(dān)了相應(yīng)責(zé)任,遭受了損失,可以向集資人進行追償。由于非法集資案件的特殊性,通過與一般救濟途徑比較,本文探索了“清理清退”的救濟方式。
[Abstract]:Illegal fund-raising cases are complex, and secured illegal fundraising cases are even more complex.The undertaking of guarantor's liability is not only related to civil liability, but also connected with criminal liability. How to deal with it has become the focus of public attention, and it is also controversial.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part is about the relationship between guarantee and illegal financing.In recent years, there have been frequent and complicated cases of illegal fund-raising in our country. Most of them are secured by guarantors. It is not only difficult but also controversial to deal with them. How to deal with the guarantee disputes in illegal fund-raising?Is to deal with illegal fund-raising cases can not avoid the problem.The second part is about the validity of the loan contract in the illegal financing case.Through the analysis of different types of the crime of illegal fund-raising, the validity of the loan contract involved in the illegal fund-raising is determined according to the folk loan contract or the fund-raising loan contract.The viewpoint that the loan contract is valid in the illegal raising fund lacks validity, and the loan contract involved in the illegal raising of funds should be regarded as invalid.The third part is about the validity of the guarantee contract.The guarantee contract of raising funds is regarded as the slave contract of illegal financing, which is invalidated by the main contract.In such a case, would the guarantor be held liable for the security?Take responsibility for what?In my opinion, the liability of guarantor should be liability of compensation and fault of contract.The fourth part is about the relief of the rights and interests of the guarantor under the situation of illegal financing.In the illegal raising of funds, the guarantor bears the corresponding responsibility and suffers losses, and may recover from the fundraiser.Due to the particularity of illegal fund-raising cases, this paper explores the relief methods of "clearing up and returning" by comparing with the general remedies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張龍飛;;擔(dān)保合同無效下的保證人責(zé)任問題[J];智富時代;2016年06期

2 朱明陽;王云鵬;;試論民刑交叉案件中合同的效力問題[J];重慶廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年04期

3 徐春培;;打擊非法集資 凈化市場環(huán)境——專訪處置非法集資部際聯(lián)席會議辦公室主任劉張君[J];中國農(nóng)村金融;2014年12期

4 王f，

本文編號：1753961