發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-14 14:21

  本文選題：販賣毒品 + 毒品數(shù)量　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：鴉片和中國半殖民地半封建社會(huì)的開端有著不可分離的關(guān)系，毒品在中國人心中是導(dǎo)致近代以來中國喪權(quán)辱國的一個(gè)罪魁禍?zhǔn)�。直到現(xiàn)在，民眾也沒有抹去這種心理陰霾即依然是“談毒色變”。國家對(duì)于毒品犯罪采取“零容忍”的態(tài)度，表現(xiàn)在刑法設(shè)置罪名體系抑制毒品的生產(chǎn)與流通，并對(duì)走私、販賣毒品罪等核心罪名配以多個(gè)法定刑等級(jí)和極刑。在此基礎(chǔ)上，嚴(yán)刑重罰的司法取向同樣清晰載現(xiàn)了受歷史創(chuàng)痛和對(duì)濫用毒品恐懼心理的影響痕跡。有鑒于此，如何立足于罪刑均衡原則合理量刑，理應(yīng)引起刑法學(xué)界的高度關(guān)注。 本文共分六個(gè)部分：共40000字。 第一部分：概述目前現(xiàn)行刑法規(guī)定的走私、販賣、運(yùn)輸、制造毒品罪的構(gòu)成特點(diǎn)及法定刑配置，歸納其刑罰配置和適用的重刑特征，簡單介紹審判實(shí)踐中適用刑罰的現(xiàn)狀。 第二部分：分析毒品種類、數(shù)量、純度對(duì)量刑的影響。首先，由于毒品種類不同對(duì)濫用者的危害就不同，不同種類毒品毒害程度可以經(jīng)實(shí)驗(yàn)形成折算公式予以判斷，由國家食品藥品監(jiān)督管理局負(fù)責(zé)對(duì)追加管理的毒品確定折算比例，可以保障量刑的客觀性和科學(xué)性；其次，毒品數(shù)量是決定毒品犯罪社會(huì)危害性的最重要的因素，目前法院對(duì)量刑起點(diǎn)和基準(zhǔn)刑的確定主要依據(jù)是毒品數(shù)量；最后，主張毒品的數(shù)量要按照純度進(jìn)行折算。 第三部分：分析走私、販賣、運(yùn)輸、制造毒品罪未遂對(duì)量刑的影響。首先明晰了“販賣”的含義，針對(duì)販賣毒品罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提出了“進(jìn)入交付環(huán)節(jié)”的觀點(diǎn)，緊接著討論了同一個(gè)案件中部分毒品進(jìn)入交付環(huán)節(jié)而部分毒品未進(jìn)入交付環(huán)節(jié)如何合理計(jì)算毒品數(shù)量的問題，并提出參照未遂形態(tài)下的從輕或者減輕幅度來合理量刑的觀點(diǎn)；其次，以販賣毒品罪的未遂形態(tài)為參照，確定其他三種行為類型的未遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；最后，針對(duì)走私、販賣、運(yùn)輸、制造毒品罪不能犯未遂，提出以行為人行為的客觀危害性為中心合理量刑的主張。 第四部分：分析對(duì)走私、販賣、運(yùn)輸、制造毒品罪共犯人的量刑。首先，就受雇傭運(yùn)輸毒品的行為人的責(zé)任問題，提出通常情況下從輕處罰的主張；并認(rèn)為多人同時(shí)受雇傭運(yùn)輸毒品的案件中，僅憑“幾個(gè)受雇傭運(yùn)輸毒品的行為人相互之間明知各自為同一個(gè)雇主運(yùn)輸毒品”這一條件不能認(rèn)定為共犯，其毒品數(shù)量不應(yīng)合計(jì)。其次，就居間介紹毒品交易中如何認(rèn)定居間人的毒品數(shù)量問題，提出若居間人在介紹過程中有明確的毒品數(shù)量則按該毒品數(shù)量計(jì)算，若只有概括故意未具體提及毒品數(shù)量則按該次交易中實(shí)際交易的毒品數(shù)量計(jì)算。 第五部分：分析在誘惑偵查下對(duì)犯罪人的量刑。首先，否定“犯意誘發(fā)型”偵查的正當(dāng)性；其次，針對(duì)“機(jī)會(huì)提供型”誘惑偵查下實(shí)施犯罪的人，提出將其按未遂犯予以處理的觀點(diǎn)；最后，對(duì)于“數(shù)量型”誘惑偵查下實(shí)施犯罪的人，應(yīng)當(dāng)在計(jì)算毒品數(shù)量的時(shí)候，將受誘惑超出行為人犯意范圍的部分毒品數(shù)量排除于定罪量刑數(shù)額之外。 第六部分：分析毒品再犯對(duì)量刑的影響。首先，簡要介紹毒品再犯與累犯之間的關(guān)系，其次，，主張二者競(jìng)合時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)按“重法優(yōu)于輕罰”規(guī)則，且對(duì)其予以具體論證。
[Abstract]:The beginning of opium and China semi colonial and semi feudal society has inseparable relations, drugs in the Chinese heart is leading to a arch-criminal Chinese humiliating since modern times. Until now, the people did not erase the psychological haze that is still about poison discoloration. "The country adopted a" zero tolerance "attitude to drug crime, production and circulation performance set the charge system in the criminal law and the suppression of drugs, smuggling, drug trafficking and other core crimes with a number of statutory punishment level and capital punishment. On this basis, the orientation of judicial penalties also clear the historical load effect on the pain and fear of drug abuse traces. In view of this, based on how the principle of reasonable sentencing, should arouse the attention of criminal academia.
This article is divided into six parts: a total of 40000 words.
The first part is an overview of the characteristics of the crime of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing drugs, and the allocation of statutory penalty in the current criminal law. The characteristics of penalty allocation and applicable penalty are summarized, and the application of penalty in trial practice is briefly introduced.
The second part: quantitative analysis of drugs, and affect the purity of sentencing. Firstly, due to different types of harm to the drug abusers is different, different types of drugs can be formed by the degree of toxicity experimental conversion formula to judge, the conversion ratio is determined by the State Food and drug administration is responsible for the management of additional drugs, can guarantee the objectivity and the science of sentencing; secondly, the quantity of drugs is the most important factor in determining the social harmfulness of drug crimes, the court for sentencing and punishment to determine the benchmark starting point is the main basis for the quantity of drugs; the number of claims, drugs to convert in accordance with purity.
The third part: the analysis of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing drugs affect the attempted crime on the sentencing. First clarify the meaning of "trafficking" standard for the crime of drug trafficking crime put forward "into delivery link" point of view, then discusses the central one case is divided into the delivery of drugs and some drugs did not link enter the delivery link how to calculate the quantity of drugs, and put forward the reference to the attempted form of a lighter or mitigated rate to reasonable sentencing opinion; secondly, in the form of attempted crime of drug trafficking as a reference to determine the attempted standard other three types of activities; finally, for smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing of drugs can not make put forward to attempt, objective harm behavior is reasonable sentencing claims.
The fourth part: the analysis of smuggling, trafficking, transporting and manufacturing of drugs were criminal sentencing. Firstly, by hiring responsibility to transport drugs to people, this usually lighter punishment claims; and that many people are hired to transport drugs cases at the same time, only by "a few hired to transport drugs the behavior of people between the respective knowing the condition of the same employer transporting drugs can not be identified as an accomplice, the quantity of drugs should not be together. Secondly, how to determine the quantity of drug problem is the intermediary intermediary drug deal, if a broker in the introduction process have definite quantity of drugs is calculated according to the the quantity of drugs, if only the general intention did not specifically mention the number of drugs according to the actual quantity of drugs transaction in the transaction in the calculation.
The fifth part: the analysis of the crime in the enticementdetection sentencing. Firstly, negative "make legitimacy of the intention luring investigation; secondly, according to the" opportunity to provide "the crime under the temptation investigation, put forward according to the attempted offense to deal with the point of view; finally, the" quantity "of temptation investigation the implementation of the crime, should be in the calculation of the quantity of drugs, the number of parts will be affected by the temptation of drugs beyond the scope of criminal behavior intention on the conviction and sentencing amount.
The sixth part analyzes the impact of drug recidivism on sentencing. First, it briefly introduces the relationship between recidivism and recidivism. Secondly, it argues that when the two compete concurrence, we should follow the rule of "heavier punishment than punishment" and demonstrate it concretely.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王太寧;;論制造毒品罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

2 李明;;誘惑偵查在毒品犯罪偵查中的合法性判斷[J];河北法學(xué);2008年11期

3 吳宏耀;論我國誘餌偵查制度的立法建構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2001年02期

4 王軍,李樹昆,盧宇蓉;破解毒品犯罪法律適用難題——毒品犯罪法律適用問題研討會(huì)綜述[J];人民檢察;2004年11期

5 馬克昌;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策芻議[J];人民檢察;2006年19期

6 李永升;;運(yùn)輸毒品罪立法與司法問題研究[J];刑法論叢;2012年04期

7 張洪成;;毒品犯罪共犯成立問題研究[J];石河子大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

本文編號(hào)：1749700