發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-25 06:27

  本文選題：強(qiáng)奸罪與強(qiáng)制猥褻罪　切入點(diǎn)：強(qiáng)奸罪犯罪對(duì)象擴(kuò)大化　出處：《深圳大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：無論在實(shí)務(wù)見解還是在理論研究,強(qiáng)奸罪一直是備受關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。強(qiáng)奸罪作為一項(xiàng)古老的自然犯罪,也是司法實(shí)踐中的一種常見犯罪,它不僅嚴(yán)重侵犯他人的人身權(quán)利,造成其身體和精神上的創(chuàng)傷,甚至導(dǎo)致被害人死亡,而且嚴(yán)重?cái)_亂社會(huì)治安,造成很大的社會(huì)危害性,一直以來都是我國刑事立法與實(shí)踐中著重打擊的對(duì)象。但是,在司法實(shí)踐中,強(qiáng)奸案件的情況可乃相當(dāng)復(fù)雜,司法機(jī)關(guān)審理這種案件時(shí),常常會(huì)遇到一些疑難問題,譬如,如何辨別強(qiáng)奸罪與強(qiáng)制猥褻罪之間的區(qū)別、男性是否需要納入強(qiáng)奸罪的犯罪對(duì)象中去、婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸的犯罪化、強(qiáng)奸罪的精神損害賠償?shù)葐栴}。不僅理論界就上述相關(guān)問題莫衷一是,存有爭(zhēng)議,司法機(jī)關(guān)也往往為這些問題困擾不已,有時(shí)甚或?qū)ν瑯拥陌讣鞒霾煌奶幚�。因�?正確認(rèn)識(shí)和處理這些問題就顯得尤為重要,正確把握、分析、界定強(qiáng)奸罪與強(qiáng)制猥褻罪之間的區(qū)別主要表現(xiàn)在兩者的主觀方面,與強(qiáng)奸罪相比,強(qiáng)制猥褻在主觀目的上不具備性交目的;強(qiáng)奸罪對(duì)象化擴(kuò)大,要修改刑法中關(guān)于強(qiáng)奸罪的法律條文,將“婦女”修改為他人,將“幼女”修改為“兒童”;婚內(nèi)強(qiáng)奸入罪,肯定丈夫可以成為強(qiáng)奸罪的犯罪主體,但同時(shí)要否定妻子具有特殊防衛(wèi)權(quán),且限定訴訟時(shí)效;以立法的形式確立強(qiáng)奸罪精神損害賠償制度,將強(qiáng)奸罪的賠償數(shù)額分為,10萬元、8萬元、6萬元、4萬元和2萬元五個(gè)等級(jí)。筆者試圖對(duì)上述相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行粗淺的研究、探討,以期有益于我國刑事司法實(shí)務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The crime of rape, as an ancient natural crime and a common crime in judicial practice, is not only a serious violation of the personal rights of others, but also a common one in both practical and theoretical research. It causes physical and mental trauma, even leads to the death of the victim, and seriously disturbs the public order and causes great social harm. It has always been the object of our country's criminal legislation and practice. In judicial practice, the case of rape can be quite complicated. When the judicial authorities try such cases, they often encounter some difficult problems, such as how to distinguish between the crime of rape and the crime of forcible indecency. Whether men need to be included in the crime of rape, the criminalization of marital rape, the compensation for moral damage of rape and so on. The judiciary is often troubled by these problems, and sometimes even deals with the same cases differently. Therefore, it is particularly important to correctly understand and deal with these problems. The difference between the crime of rape and the crime of forcible indecency is mainly manifested in the subjective aspect of both. Compared with the crime of rape, compulsory indecency does not have the purpose of sexual intercourse on the subjective purpose. It is necessary to amend the legal provisions on the crime of rape in the Criminal Law, to amend "women" to others, and "young girls" to "children"; and to criminalize rape within marriage, affirming that the husband can become the subject of the crime of rape. But at the same time, we should deny the wife's right of special defense and limit the limitation of action; establish the system of compensation for moral damage in the crime of rape by way of legislation. The amount of compensation for the crime of rape is divided into five levels: 100000 yuan, 80,000 yuan, 60,000 yuan, 40,000 yuan and 20,000 yuan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 郭紅敏;;“同性強(qiáng)奸”遭遇法律空白[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2011年15期

2 魏昌東;趙軒;;論男性性自主權(quán)之刑法保護(hù)[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年06期

3 杜江;;中英刑法上強(qiáng)奸罪之比較[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年03期

4 夏蕾;;淺談同性性侵犯——以犯罪學(xué)的方法[J];理論界;2007年02期

5 章惠萍;;男性性權(quán)利的刑法保護(hù)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年08期

6 蘇彩霞;域外強(qiáng)奸罪立法的新發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年02期

7 莫洪憲;論女性刑事被害人之權(quán)益救濟(jì)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1661939