發(fā)布時間：2018-03-25 04:12

  本文選題：受賄罪　切入點：法定刑　出處：《華中師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：懲治受賄等腐敗犯罪是廉政建設重點,構建合理的受賄罪法定刑對預防和懲治腐敗犯罪有重要意義。而當前我國受賄罪法定刑采取與貪污罪法定刑相同的做法,在生命刑、財產(chǎn)刑、自由刑、資格刑等內(nèi)容上產(chǎn)生了諸多問題,明顯不能適應當前經(jīng)濟和社會形勢及司法工作的需要。學界在上述問題上也并未達成一致意見。故文章擬在借鑒古今中外受賄罪的法定刑先進做法基礎之上,聯(lián)系我國司法實踐,從生命刑、自由刑、財產(chǎn)刑等角度對受賄罪的法定刑進行探索并予以完善。全文分為以下幾個部分： 第一部分對我國古代、民主革命時期、建國后關于受賄罪法定刑的沿革和特點予以概括,并且同當今刑法規(guī)定對比,總結古今異同。 第二部分聯(lián)系當前司法實踐情況,總結受賄罪法定刑規(guī)定存在的問題,這些問題包括受賄罪死刑是否應當廢除及如何發(fā)展替代性措施、以數(shù)額作為受賄罪定罪量刑標準是否合理、以五千元作為受賄罪的起點是否適應當前經(jīng)濟發(fā)展形勢之需要、怎樣處理犯罪數(shù)額與犯罪情節(jié)的關系、自由刑檔次和幅度交叉重復問題如何解決、受賄罪財產(chǎn)刑中罰金刑與沒收財產(chǎn)刑如何選擇適用、在受賄罪法定刑中如何增加資格刑等。 第三部分以典型國家和地區(qū)作為代表,對其受賄罪的法定刑規(guī)定予以闡釋,對比和借鑒其合理成分并予以分析。例如美國在受賄罪的財產(chǎn)刑上很少適用沒收財產(chǎn)這種刑罰,德國針對不同的公務身份在受賄罪法定刑上設置不同的法定刑,這些做法對我國當前受賄罪法定刑完善不乏借鑒的可能性。 第四部分針對當前我國受賄罪法定刑存在的問題,借鑒國內(nèi)外受賄罪法定刑規(guī)定中的合理做法,從以下途徑予以完善：一是建議取消死刑的適用；二是建立銜接有序、檔次合理的自由刑；三是增設罰金刑且限制沒收財產(chǎn)刑的適用；四是完善資格刑內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:Punishing the crime of corruption bribery is the key construction, reasonable construction of the bribery crime legal punishment to prevent and punish the crime of corruption is of great significance. And the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country take legal punishment and corruption in the same way, life penalty, freedom penalty, property penalty, qualification penalty and so on has many problems obviously, can not adapt to the needs of the current economic and social situation and judicial work. Scholars on the issue has not reached a consensus. So this article on the basis of legal punishment practices at all times and in all countries of the crime of accepting bribes, with China's judicial practice, from the death penalty, freedom penalty, legal punishment of bribery criminal property the angle of exploration and to be perfect. The full text is divided into the following parts:
The first part generalizes the evolution and characteristics of the statutory penalty for bribery crime in ancient China during the period of democratic revolution, and summarizes the similarities and differences between ancient and modern times compared with the provisions of today's criminal law.
The second part with the current judicial practice, summarize the existing provisions of the legal punishment of bribery crime problems, these problems include the bribery crime whether the death penalty should be abolished and how to develop alternative measures, as to the amount of bribery conviction and sentencing standards is reasonable, whether the starting point to five thousand yuan as the crime of accepting bribes to meet the needs of the current economic development situation, how to to deal with the relationship between the amount of crime and crime plot, freedom penalty grade and amplitude overlapping how to solve the problem, the bribery crime in the property penalty of fine penalty and the penalty of confiscation of property is how to choose, how to increase the qualification penalty in the legal punishment of bribery crime.
The third part of the typical countries and regions as the representative, the provisions of its legal punishment of bribery crime is explained, comparing and drawing lessons from the reasonable composition were analyzed. Such as the United States in the bribery crime penalty of property confiscation of property is rarely this penalty in Germany for different setting official body different legal punishment in legal punishment of bribery crime on the practice of China's current legal punishment of bribery crime has the possibility to perfect reference.
The fourth part of the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country currently existing problems, from domestic and foreign bribery provisions of the statutory sentence of the crime in a reasonable approach, to be perfect from the following ways: one is that for the abolition of the death penalty; the two is the establishment of cohesion and orderly, reasonable grade of imprisonment; three is additional fines and confiscation of property restrictions apply punishment; the four is to improve the qualification penalty.

【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.392

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孫恒山;“腐敗”概念的分析與刑法學思考[J];當代法學;2005年01期

2 梁統(tǒng);資格刑之反思與重構——以剝奪政治權利為視角[J];中國地質(zhì)大學學報(社會科學版);2003年02期

3 袁登明;;尋求緩解財產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行難之道在現(xiàn)有法律框架下的制度創(chuàng)建[J];法律適用;2006年07期

4 應秀良;;以罰金繳納作為減刑條件的制度思考[J];法律適用;2007年01期

5 馬克昌;;“寬嚴相濟”刑事政策與刑罰立法的完善[J];法商研究;2007年01期

6 李海瀅;麻銳;;腐敗犯罪控制視野下的資格刑研究[J];法學雜志;2009年07期

7 謝望原;;歐陸刑罰改革成就與我國刑罰方法重構[J];法學家;2006年01期

8 陳雷;國際反腐敗法律機制中的資產(chǎn)追回制度[J];法學;2004年08期

9 葉小琴;中國古代受賄犯罪立法的歷史考察[J];江蘇警官學院學報;2004年02期

10 楊彩霞;沒收財產(chǎn)刑的困境與出路[J];華東政法學院學報;2001年04期

，

本文編號：1661479