本文選題：危險駕駛罪　切入點：新社會防衛(wèi)運動　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2011年2月25日第十一屆全國人民代表大會常務(wù)委員會第十九次會議審議的《中華人民共和國刑法修正案(八)》將危險駕駛行為納入我國刑法,之后的相關(guān)司法解釋將危險駕駛行為確定為危險駕駛罪。危險駕駛?cè)胄谈淖兞诉^去“肇事后再處罰”的做法,充分表明國家對嚴(yán)厲打擊危險駕駛行為的態(tài)度和決心,也引起了社會的廣泛關(guān)注。但是,此罪名的刑罰設(shè)置成了我國刑罰體系中最為特殊的一個,僅判處拘役,并處罰金。該罪獨特的刑罰設(shè)置造成了諸多關(guān)于刑罰適用的問題,進(jìn)而,需要對該罪刑罰問題進(jìn)行研究。 上世紀(jì)五十年代在西方國家興起了以法國的馬克·安賽爾教授為代表的新社會防衛(wèi)運動。該運動的主導(dǎo)思想是開展“非犯罪化”、“非刑事化”的人道主義刑事運動,提出刑罰目的不在于懲罰,而在于社會教育,通過刑罰的方式使犯罪人重新社會化,進(jìn)而達(dá)到防衛(wèi)社會的目的,并堅決反對短期監(jiān)禁刑。但是我國刑法將危險駕駛罪刑種設(shè)置為拘役,恰恰屬于短期自由刑的一種。因此需要從新社會防衛(wèi)運動的視角探討危險駕駛罪的刑罰問題。 本文共分三大部分。 第一部分是關(guān)于危險駕駛罪的概述,闡明危險駕駛?cè)胱锏牧⒎ㄑ馗�、入罪理�?進(jìn)而引出危險駕駛罪刑罰設(shè)置的獨特性。危險駕駛罪的刑罰表述“處拘役,并處罰金”,從這短短的七個字中可以看出危險駕駛罪的刑罰設(shè)置為拘役刑加罰金刑的一種組合方式。這種單一的刑罰設(shè)置成為危險駕駛罪刑罰最為獨特的地方。 第二部分是從新社會防衛(wèi)運動的視角審視危險駕駛罪刑罰方面存在的問題。該部分從“新社會防衛(wèi)論”的主要觀點出發(fā),闡述“新社會防衛(wèi)運動”對刑罰改革的建議,并以該運動的視角來具體分析危險駕駛罪刑罰設(shè)置存在的弊端,通過對危險駕駛罪個案的實證研究,指出危險駕駛罪拘役刑在實際執(zhí)行過程中存在的問題。 第三部分在闡述了馬克·安塞爾的“新社會防衛(wèi)論”的主要觀點,具體分析危險駕駛罪刑罰存在的問題后,本文認(rèn)為在現(xiàn)行刑法關(guān)于危險駕駛罪結(jié)構(gòu)的情況下,解決危險駕駛罪刑罰存在的問題應(yīng)當(dāng)從刑罰設(shè)置、刑罰裁量、刑罰執(zhí)行三方面進(jìn)行完善。
[Abstract]:The Amendment to the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (8), which was considered at the 19th session of the standing Committee of the 11th National people's Congress on February 25th 2011, incorporated dangerous driving behavior into our criminal law. The relevant judicial explanations later defined dangerous driving behavior as a dangerous driving offence. Dangerous driving punishment changed the past practice of "punishing after causing an accident", which fully demonstrated the state's attitude and determination to severely crack down on dangerous driving behavior. However, the penalty for this crime has become the most special one in the penalty system of our country, only sentenced to criminal detention and fined. The unique penalty setup of this crime has caused many problems about the application of the penalty. Furthermore, it is necessary to study the penalty of the crime. In -50s, a new social defense movement, represented by Professor Mark Ansel of France, emerged in Western countries. The main idea of the movement was to launch a humanitarian criminal movement of "decriminalization" and "decriminalization". It is pointed out that the purpose of punishment is not to punish, but to educate the society, to resocialize the criminal by means of punishment, and to achieve the goal of defending the society. But our criminal law sets the crime of dangerous driving as criminal detention, which is just one kind of short-term free punishment. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the penalty of dangerous driving from the perspective of the new social defense movement. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the summary of dangerous driving crime, expounding the legislative evolution of dangerous driving incrimination, the reason of incrimination, and the uniqueness of penalty setting of dangerous driving crime. From these short words, we can see that the penalty of dangerous driving is a combination of criminal detention and fine, and this kind of single penalty has become the most unique place for dangerous driving. The second part is to examine the problems existing in the penalty of dangerous driving crime from the perspective of the New Social Defense Movement, which expounds the suggestions of the New Social Defense Movement on the reform of penalty from the main point of view of the "New Social Defense Theory". And from the perspective of the movement to concretely analyze the drawbacks of the penalty set of dangerous driving crime, through the case of dangerous driving crime empirical study, pointed out the dangerous driving crime of criminal detention in the actual implementation of the existing problems. In the third part, after expounding the main viewpoints of Mark Ansel's "New Social Defense Theory," and analyzing the problems in the penalty of dangerous driving crime, the author thinks that in the current criminal law about the structure of dangerous driving crime, To solve the problems existing in the penalty of dangerous driving crime, we should perfect it from three aspects: penalty setting, penalty discretion and penalty execution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙秉志;張磊;;“酒駕”危害行為的刑法立法對策[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年12期

2 曲新久;;醉駕不一律入罪無需依賴于“但書”的適用[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

3 尹曉靜;;刑事政策與新社會防衛(wèi)論——淺評盧建平教授《刑事政策與刑法》[J];法制與社會;2008年17期

4 梁根林;;“醉駕”入刑后的定罪困擾與省思[J];法學(xué);2013年03期

5 何榮功;羅繼洲;;也論抽象危險犯的構(gòu)造與刑法“但書”之關(guān)系——以危險駕駛罪為引例[J];法學(xué)評論;2013年05期

6 王宇明;;論危險駕駛罪的刑罰設(shè)置[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年11期

7 張明楷;;危險駕駛的刑事責(zé)任[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年06期

8 王沖;;論危險駕駛的實害犯——兼論刑法第133條之1第2款的不足與完善[J];江西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

9 孟U，

本文編號：1643960