本文選題：重大責(zé)任事故罪　切入點(diǎn)：從業(yè)禁止　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：雖然我國(guó)重大責(zé)任事故罪一直在不斷發(fā)展及完善,但是十年前的罪狀表述已經(jīng)不能滿足當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐的需要。歷經(jīng)多次立法修改和司法解釋的補(bǔ)充,但是本罪的主體依然限定在自然人范圍內(nèi),刑罰也只是調(diào)整了自由刑的刑期。為了更好地完善本罪,本文在總結(jié)前人研究理論成果的基礎(chǔ)上,采取理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際的方法同時(shí)結(jié)合被允許風(fēng)險(xiǎn)理論、《刑法修正案(九)》,試圖對(duì)本罪進(jìn)行較為全面深入的分析。本文分為引言、正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)。正文一共由三章組成。第一章是本文的邏輯起點(diǎn)第一節(jié)首先對(duì)本罪的概念和立法沿革做了概述。其次結(jié)合現(xiàn)實(shí)司法實(shí)踐中遇到的一些問(wèn)題對(duì)本罪實(shí)踐中的構(gòu)成要件主要問(wèn)題結(jié)合司法解釋進(jìn)行剖析。第二節(jié)首先分析本罪“違反安全管理規(guī)定”適用“規(guī)定”的諸多問(wèn)題。其次對(duì)本罪空白罪狀如何適用進(jìn)行闡釋主觀方面,指出了目前司法實(shí)踐中還需進(jìn)一步明確但沒(méi)有法律依據(jù)的地方提出自己的觀點(diǎn)及建議。再次,對(duì)罪過(guò)形式諸觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行辨析的同時(shí)提出自己的看法。最后對(duì)本罪的主體要件結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行分析。第二章對(duì)本罪在司法認(rèn)定的中一些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析。首先將本罪與意外事故進(jìn)行了區(qū)分,其次結(jié)合被允許風(fēng)險(xiǎn)理論分析本罪與技術(shù)事故的區(qū)分。最后分析本罪與重大勞動(dòng)安全事故罪、危險(xiǎn)品肇事罪、消防責(zé)任事故罪之間的不同之處,并對(duì)兩罪的競(jìng)合做了闡述。第三章是本文核心,對(duì)完善本罪提出一些可行性建議。首先指出本罪現(xiàn)存的缺陷。目前本罪僅僅規(guī)制了自然人犯罪的情形,忽略了單位犯罪的多發(fā)性。與國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法相比,我國(guó)重大責(zé)任事故罪不管是刑種結(jié)構(gòu)還是刑期都存在落后于司法實(shí)踐的情形。其次結(jié)合國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法及我國(guó)《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)本罪的犯罪主體、法定刑及刑種結(jié)構(gòu)提出完善建議。
[Abstract]:Although the crime of major liability accident in our country has been developing and perfecting, but the description of the crime ten years ago can no longer meet the needs of the current judicial practice. After many legislative amendments and the supplement of judicial interpretation, However, the subject of this crime is still confined to the scope of natural persons, and the penalty only adjusts the sentence of the free penalty. In order to perfect the crime better, this paper summarizes the theoretical results of previous studies. Taking the method of combining theory with practice and combining the theory of permissible risk, "Criminal Law Amendment (9)", attempts to make a more comprehensive and in-depth analysis of this crime. This article is divided into two parts: introduction, The text and conclusion. The text consists of three chapters. The first chapter is the logical starting point of this article. The first section gives an overview of the concept and legislative evolution of the crime. The main problems of the elements in practice are analyzed in combination with judicial interpretation. The second section first analyzes many problems in the application of this crime "violating the safety management regulations". Secondly, it interprets the subjective aspects of how the blank crime is applied. Pointing out that in the current judicial practice there is still need to further clarify but there is no legal basis to put forward their own views and suggestions. Again, Finally, the main elements of this crime combined with judicial practice are analyzed. The second chapter analyzes some problems in the judicial cognizance of this crime. A distinction is made between crimes and accidents, Secondly, combining the permitted risk theory to analyze the distinction between this crime and the technical accident. Finally, the difference between this crime and the crime of major labor safety accident, dangerous goods accident crime, fire responsibility accident crime is analyzed. The third chapter is the core of this article, and puts forward some feasible suggestions to improve the crime. Firstly, it points out the existing defects of this crime. At present, this crime only regulates the situation of natural person crime. Ignoring the high incidence of unit crime. Compared with foreign advanced legislation, The crime of major liability accident in our country has the situation of lagging behind the judicial practice, no matter whether it is the type of punishment structure or the term of imprisonment. Secondly, combining with the advanced foreign legislation and the Criminal Law Amendment (9) of our country, the author of the crime, The legal penalty and the structure of the punishment are put forward to perfect the suggestion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 童策;;刑法中從業(yè)禁止的性質(zhì)及其適用[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 楊肖寧;;淺析重大責(zé)任事故罪的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];今日南國(guó)(中旬刊);2010年11期

3 周世光;;淺析當(dāng)前重大責(zé)任事故罪的立法缺陷與完善[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 申柳華;;重大責(zé)任事故罪自然人主體研究——對(duì)全國(guó)63個(gè)重大責(zé)任事故案例的法律實(shí)證分析[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 于曉敏;從業(yè)禁止刑法化之探究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

2 王曉煥;重大責(zé)任事故罪研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1636262