發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-02 19:42

  本文選題：賣淫　切入點(diǎn)：組織賣淫　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：組織賣淫作為一種淫媒類犯罪,它所帶來的危害性主要表現(xiàn)在對(duì)社會(huì)管理秩序的擾亂以及對(duì)社會(huì)風(fēng)尚的侵蝕。刑法對(duì)該種行為的打擊更多的是在于其“有組織性”的賣淫,它比普通的賣淫所帶來的社會(huì)危害性要大的多。實(shí)踐中有組織賣淫的情形也十分復(fù)雜,正是基于此,本文從以下幾個(gè)部分對(duì)實(shí)踐中可能存在的一些問題作出論述。第一部分,該部分重點(diǎn)對(duì)組織賣淫罪中賣淫的概念以及賣淫的主體和對(duì)象進(jìn)行了梳理,這是構(gòu)成本罪必須厘清的問題,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在的性交易方式開始呈現(xiàn)多種多樣的形態(tài),如雞奸、口淫、手淫、波推等等,這些行為方式從立法原意以及對(duì)社會(huì)的危害性上看與性器官接觸這樣方式的賣淫并沒有本質(zhì)上的區(qū)別,均是廣義上的賣淫,對(duì)組織實(shí)施這些行為的也應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定為組織賣淫罪。第二部分,主要論述的問題是組織賣淫罪與相關(guān)罪名之間的關(guān)系,重點(diǎn)論述了組織賣淫罪與強(qiáng)迫賣淫罪之間、協(xié)助組織賣淫罪之間的關(guān)系,其中對(duì)組織賣淫罪中的“組織”的理解是該部分重點(diǎn),“組織”行為中不應(yīng)當(dāng)包含“強(qiáng)迫”手段,否則組織賣淫罪的外延將包含強(qiáng)迫賣淫罪,這與現(xiàn)行立法本意好似不相符的。其次對(duì)組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的罪間界限問題作了充分的論證,首先論證的是組織賣淫罪中沒有主、從犯的區(qū)分。從本質(zhì)上看,協(xié)助組織賣淫的行為構(gòu)成組織賣淫的從犯,只不過刑法將這種幫助行為單獨(dú)規(guī)定為一罪,這突出體現(xiàn)了刑法對(duì)該種行為的社會(huì)危害性的重視,且刑法做這樣的規(guī)定在理論上是不存在障礙的。因此應(yīng)當(dāng)從主、從犯的角度劃分出組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的罪間界限。接著該部分還具體論述了組織賣淫罪與容留賣淫罪的罪間界限問題。第三部分,該部分主要論述組織賣淫罪的犯罪形態(tài)問題。首先,組織賣淫罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)以“組織行為”為基準(zhǔn),不應(yīng)將是否實(shí)施了“賣淫行為”作為判斷本罪的既遂,但是組織行為完成應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮它的社會(huì)意義,即以能夠向不特定人提供賣淫活動(dòng)作為既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn),而不是單純的以手段行為的實(shí)施完畢作為既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。另外,本文論述了組織賣淫罪的罪數(shù)問題,基于本文所持觀點(diǎn),因?yàn)榻M織賣淫罪當(dāng)中的“組織行為”并不包含“強(qiáng)迫行為”,因此所謂的以強(qiáng)制手段實(shí)施的組織賣淫行為,不應(yīng)以牽連犯對(duì)待,應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)為符合數(shù)個(gè)犯罪構(gòu)成,構(gòu)成數(shù)罪。
[Abstract]:Organization prostitution, as a kind of pimp crime, brings harmfulness mainly in disturbing the social management order and eroding the social fashion. The criminal law strikes this kind of behavior more in its "organized" prostitution. It is much more harmful to society than ordinary prostitution. The situation of organized prostitution in practice is also very complex. Based on this, this paper discusses some possible problems in practice from the following parts. This part focuses on the concept of prostitution in the crime of organizing prostitution, as well as the subject and object of prostitution. This is a problem that must be clarified as the crime is constituted, because the current ways of sex trade are beginning to take on a variety of forms, such as sodomy and adultery. Masturbation, push-ups, etc., in terms of legislative intent and harmfulness to society, there is no essential difference between prostitution and sexual organ contact, all of which are broadly defined as prostitution. The second part mainly deals with the relationship between the crime of organizing prostitution and the related charges, with the emphasis on the relationship between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of forced prostitution. The relationship between the offences of assisting the organization of prostitution, in which the understanding of the "organization" in the crime of organizing prostitution is the focus of this part, and that the conduct of the "organization" should not contain the means of "coercion", otherwise the extension of the crime of organizing prostitution would include the crime of forced prostitution, This seems to be inconsistent with the original intention of the current legislation. Secondly, it makes a full argument on the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of assisting the organization of prostitution. The first argument is that there is no distinction between the principal and the accomplice in the crime of organizing prostitution. Aiding the organization of prostitution constitutes an accessory to the organization of prostitution, except that the criminal law makes this aiding act a separate crime, which highlights the importance that the criminal law attaches to the social harmfulness of the act. And the criminal law makes such a provision in theory there are no obstacles. From the angle of accomplice, the author distinguishes the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of assisting in organizing prostitution, and then discusses the problem of the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of sheltering prostitution. The third part discusses the problem of the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of sheltering prostitution. First of all, the standard of accomplishing the crime of organizing prostitution should be based on the "organizational act", and should not judge the accomplishment of the crime by whether or not the "act of prostitution" has been carried out. However, the completion of organizational behavior should take into account its social significance, that is, to be able to provide prostitution to a non-specific person as the criterion of accomplishment, rather than simply using the completion of the implementation of the act of means as the criterion of accomplishment. In addition, This paper discusses the problem of the number of crimes of organizing prostitution, based on the viewpoint of this paper, because the "organizational act" in the crime of organizing prostitution does not include "forced act", so the so-called "organized prostitution" is carried out by coercive means. Should not be treated as implicated criminals, should be considered consistent with a number of crimes constitute, constitute a number of crimes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周嘯天;;“組織、強(qiáng)迫、引誘幼女賣淫”規(guī)定再解讀[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

2 葉迪南;;組織賣淫罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

3 趙軍;;死刑存廢的民意維度——以組織賣淫罪可罰性觀念的測(cè)量為中心[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年02期

4 徐松林;;我國(guó)刑法應(yīng)取消組織賣淫罪[J];政法論壇;2014年06期

5 徐松林;;以刑釋罪:一種可行的刑法實(shí)質(zhì)解釋方法——以對(duì)“組織賣淫罪”的解釋為例[J];法商研究;2014年06期

6 姜敏;;法益保護(hù)前置:刑法對(duì)食品安全保護(hù)的路徑選擇——以幫助行為正犯化為研究視角[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

7 王宇展;潘丙林;趙宇翔;;組織賣淫罪客觀方面的要件[J];人民司法;2013年14期

8 何萍;;論組織賣淫罪中的組織行為——殷某組織賣淫案評(píng)析[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

9 閻二鵬;;共犯行為正犯化及其反思[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

10 茹士春;;論幫助行為單獨(dú)定罪——以協(xié)助組織賣淫罪與組織賣淫罪的切分為例[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2011年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1557927