本文關(guān)鍵詞： 專斷性醫(yī)療行為 醫(yī)療事故罪 故意傷害罪　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：專斷性醫(yī)療行為是指違反充分說明義務(wù)或未盡充分說明義務(wù)且未經(jīng)患者同意或同意無效以及履行了充分說明卻未取得患者同意而經(jīng)行實施的醫(yī)療行為，，并且包括緊急醫(yī)療行為和強制專斷醫(yī)療行為。刑法上評價專斷性醫(yī)療行為不能一概而論，應(yīng)該具體問題具體分析。正當?shù)膶嘈葬t(yī)療行為要件主要包括醫(yī)師實施專斷性醫(yī)療行為必須符合醫(yī)療常規(guī)、行為人實施的專斷性醫(yī)療行為必須符合醫(yī)療目的及其不應(yīng)該超過必要的限度。因此總結(jié)三種具體情形，分別是患者濫用同意權(quán)、緊急醫(yī)療以及強制醫(yī)療行為。分析被害人承諾、緊急避險、目的正當以及具體說幾種阻卻專斷性醫(yī)療行為違法性的理論，主張適用推定承諾阻卻患方濫用同意權(quán)和緊急醫(yī)療，適用緊急避險阻卻強制醫(yī)療。而如何對過當?shù)膶嘈葬t(yī)療行為定性，醫(yī)療事故罪和故意傷害罪皆有成立的可能性。
[Abstract]:An arbitrary medical act is a medical act that violates or fails to fully explain the obligation and is not valid without the consent or consent of the patient and has been performed without obtaining the consent of the patient. And includes emergency medical treatment and compulsory and arbitrary medical treatment. The criminal law on the evaluation of arbitrary medical behavior can not be generalized. It should be analyzed concretely. The elements of proper arbitrary medical behavior mainly include that doctors must conform to the routine of medical treatment when they carry out arbitrary medical treatment. The arbitrary medical behavior carried out by the actor must conform to the medical purpose and should not exceed the necessary limit. Therefore, three specific situations are summarized, namely, abuse of consent by patients, emergency medical treatment and compulsory medical treatment. In order to avoid risks in an emergency, the purpose is just and specific to prevent arbitrary medical behavior from breaking the law, and to advocate the application of presumption of commitment to prevent the party from abusing consent and emergency medical treatment, It is suitable for emergency avoidance but compulsory medical treatment. However, it is possible to establish the crime of medical malpractice and the crime of intentional injury.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 蔣辰昕,宮倩;論醫(yī)師的說明義務(wù)——以“充分說明后同意”法理為基礎(chǔ)[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

2 馮衛(wèi)國,張素娟;從刑法理論看醫(yī)療行為的正當性根據(jù)[J];法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2003年01期

3 張少林;卜文;;推定同意的刑法意義探究——兼談醫(yī)療手術(shù)行為中的緊急推定同意[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

4 楊丹;;醫(yī)療行為的正當化研究[J];社會科學(xué);2009年12期

5 胡宏偉;高敏;趙英麗;李延宇;;過度醫(yī)療行為研究述評[J];社會保障研究;2013年01期

本文編號：1525707