本文選題：赦免制度 + 憲政��； 參考：《湖北大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文從赦免制度的歷史淵源和概念出發(fā),對赦免的主體、對象、內(nèi)容、赦免權的權屬及類型進行了厘定,綜合考察了現(xiàn)代赦免制度的國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)狀,分析了我國赦免制度之不足,并以憲政制度為視角分析了我國赦免制度存在的依據(jù)及意義,對我國現(xiàn)代赦免制度的重構提出建議。 文章除前言和結語外分為四個部分： 第一部分為赦免制度概述,對中外赦免制度的歷史沿革進行了梳理,綜合評析了學界對于赦免主體、對象、內(nèi)容、赦免權權屬的不同觀點,在此基礎上對于赦免的概念提出了自己的觀點——赦免的概念應表述為：國家元首或國家權力機關以國家名義宣告對犯罪人免除其罪,或者雖不能免除其罪,但免除或者減輕其刑,使刑事追訴權、刑罰裁量權或者刑罰執(zhí)行權歸于消滅的法律制度。 第二部分為赦免制度的現(xiàn)狀,分為國外現(xiàn)狀與國內(nèi)現(xiàn)狀兩部分。其中,國外現(xiàn)狀按照英美法系和大陸法系,歐美和亞洲的不同特征分別選取了英、美、法、日四個國家為樣本,對其赦免制度之現(xiàn)狀進行敘述；國內(nèi)現(xiàn)狀則從立法和實踐兩個方面發(fā)掘我國赦免制度現(xiàn)狀的特點及不足。 第三部分為赦免制度存在的憲法價值及現(xiàn)實意義,分別以憲法理論和憲政實踐為視角,從赦免與分權,法治,人權的關系以及現(xiàn)實意義著手,論證我國現(xiàn)代赦免制度存在的基礎和依據(jù),提出我國需要構建完善的赦免制度體系的觀點。 第四部分為我國赦免制度的重構,從赦免類型的重構、赦免程序的法典化、赦免制度的限制、完善相應的部門法四個方面展開,為我國重構現(xiàn)代赦免制度提出建議。
[Abstract]:Starting from the historical origin and concept of the amnesty system, this paper determines the subject, object, content, ownership and types of the amnesty power, and comprehensively investigates the present situation of the modern amnesty system at home and abroad, and analyzes the deficiency of the amnesty system in China.From the perspective of constitutional system, this paper analyzes the basis and significance of the existence of the amnesty system in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the reconstruction of the modern pardon system in China.In addition to the preface and conclusion, the article is divided into four parts:The first part is an overview of the amnesty system, combing the history of the amnesty system at home and abroad, and comprehensively evaluating the different viewpoints of the academic community on the subject, object, content, ownership of the right to pardon.On this basis, it puts forward its own view on the concept of pardon, which should be expressed as: the head of State or the organ of State authority, in the name of the State, declares that the offender is exempted from the crime, or that he cannot be exonerated from the crime.However, the legal system of exonerating or abating the penalty, making the right of criminal prosecution, the discretion of penalty or the power of execution of penalty to be exterminated.The second part is the current situation of amnesty system, which is divided into two parts: the present situation of foreign countries and the present situation of China.Among them, according to the Anglo-American law system and the continental law system, the different characteristics of Europe, America, France and Japan are selected as samples to describe the current situation of the amnesty system.The present situation of our country explores the characteristics and shortcomings of the current situation of the amnesty system from the aspects of legislation and practice.The third part is the constitutional value and practical significance of the amnesty system, respectively, from the perspective of constitutional theory and constitutional practice, from the perspective of pardon and separation of powers, rule of law, human rights and practical significance.This paper demonstrates the foundation and basis of the modern amnesty system in China, and puts forward the point of view that our country needs to construct a perfect pardon system.The fourth part is the reconstruction of the pardon system in our country, from the reconstruction of the type of pardon, the codification of the amnesty procedure, the restriction of the pardon system, and the perfection of the corresponding department law, the author puts forward some suggestions for the reconstruction of the modern amnesty system in China.
【學位授予單位】：湖北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D921

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 伍操;;赦免制度的歷史存在及其現(xiàn)實合理性芻議[J];重慶師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年05期

2 陰建峰;;論赦免的概念及其屬性[J];法學家;2005年04期

3 王娜;從國際人權公約談赦免的法制化[J];江蘇公安專科學校學報;2002年02期

4 陳云生;;大赦研究初步[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2009年06期

5 賴早興;;美國行政赦免制度及其對死刑執(zhí)行的限制[J];河北法學;2006年04期

6 甘杰升;;大赦制度若干問題探析[J];經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展;2009年05期

7 林志強;赦免制度的法理分析[J];江西公安�？茖W校學報;2004年04期

8 景阿鋒;;建立我國復權制度的構想[J];遼寧行政學院學報;2008年06期

9 林志強,曾華豐;赦免制度的理性[J];成都理工大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

10 劉健,賴早興;我國赦免制度的激活與完善——基于限制死刑的思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2004年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 胡靜;赦免制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2005年

2 房方;論憲法上的赦免權[D];廈門大學;2008年

3 吉曉勇;論現(xiàn)代赦免制度[D];山東師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1739582