發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-06 21:21

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：保護(hù)　出處：《東北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的發(fā)展賦予了公眾更為充分的言論自由權(quán),但伴隨而來(lái)的是網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)無(wú)規(guī)范且無(wú)度的行使,主要體現(xiàn)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠的蔓延。近幾年來(lái)網(wǎng)絡(luò)得以廣泛應(yīng)用,隨之而來(lái)的是網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠事件頻發(fā),引起民眾不斷關(guān)注。近期兩高出臺(tái)司法解釋明確了“網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠”的法律認(rèn)定與入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并且全國(guó)均在加大打擊謠言力度,由此學(xué)界關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制問(wèn)題的討論聲更是不斷高漲。如今網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠已經(jīng)成為一種不可避免的社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,有效打擊網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠,對(duì)其進(jìn)行防治更是必不可少。如何預(yù)防和懲治網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠,究其根本是要以深入透徹地研究網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的法律規(guī)制為前提,因此,對(duì)于研究我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的法律規(guī)制勢(shì)在必行。厘清網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)及其法律規(guī)制的基本概念,把握網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的限度,既要保護(hù)權(quán)利,又要限制自由。通過(guò)本文對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制的探析,并提出完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制的對(duì)策,從而有效地防治網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠,使公民更好的實(shí)現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)。本文除了緒論與結(jié)論之外,將正文主要分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分詳細(xì)概述網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的法律規(guī)制,包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的含義、價(jià)值及限度,網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制的概念、必要性。第二部分探析當(dāng)前我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制所面臨的問(wèn)題,如界限難以劃分、憲法保護(hù)不具體、規(guī)制法律不完善、防治網(wǎng)絡(luò)造謠力度較弱。第三部分研究國(guó)外對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的法律規(guī)制且從中獲得啟示。第四部分通過(guò)借鑒外國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn),依照我國(guó)存在的問(wèn)題,結(jié)合我國(guó)的具體情況,提出完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)法律規(guī)制的對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:The development of the Internet gives the public more full right to freedom of speech, but it is accompanied by the irregular and unlimited exercise of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet, which is mainly reflected in the spread of Internet rumors. In recent years, the Internet has been widely used. What follows is the frequent occurrence of online disinformation, which has aroused the public's constant concern. The recent judicial interpretation by the two high levels has clarified the legal recognition and criminalization standards of "network rumour," and the whole country is stepping up its efforts to crack down on rumors. As a result, there has been a growing debate in academic circles on the legal regulation of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet. Nowadays, Internet rumour has become an inevitable social phenomenon, effectively cracking down on Internet disinformation. It is essential to prevent and cure it. How to prevent and punish Internet rumour is based on a thorough study of the legal regulation of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet. It is imperative to study the legal regulation of the right to freedom of online speech in China. It is necessary to clarify the basic concept of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet and to grasp the limits of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet. Through the analysis of the legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet, the author puts forward some countermeasures to perfect the legal regulation of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet in order to effectively prevent and cure the spreading of information on the Internet. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts. The first part describes the legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech on the network, including the meaning of the right to freedom of expression on the network. The second part analyzes the problems faced by the legal regulation of the right to freedom of online speech in our country, such as the difficulty of dividing the boundary, the unspecific protection of the constitution, the imperfection of the regulation law. The third part studies the foreign legal regulation on the right to freedom of online expression and gets enlightenment from it. Part 4th, according to the existing problems of our country, through drawing lessons from foreign experience, combines the concrete situation of our country. This paper puts forward some countermeasures to perfect the legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D921

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙文廣;;論言論自由權(quán)的界定與保障[J];人大研究;2007年04期

2 朱勇;;試比較中美言論自由權(quán)[J];商;2012年23期

3 閆斌;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由權(quán)的兩個(gè)限度[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2013年02期

4 馮曉青;魏衍亮;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上言論自由權(quán)與版權(quán)關(guān)系之述評(píng)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2001年02期

5 馮海清;;法律責(zé)任與公民言論自由權(quán)的博弈——從“人肉搜索”談起[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年14期

6 王鵬;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)隱私權(quán)與言論自由權(quán)的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];新西部(理論版);2011年10期

7 閆斌;周[，

本文編號(hào)：1576565