本文選題：民族　切入點：個人信息采集　出處：《中外法學》2016年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：除憲法規(guī)定的平等原則外,我國法律法規(guī)對采集和使用公民的民族信息未做任何具體限制。在各種需要填寫個人信息的表格中,民族信息往往都是必填項。實事求是地重新評估現(xiàn)有民族識別和民族信息采集體制的利與弊,是改革現(xiàn)行民族關(guān)系法制體系的基礎(chǔ)。采集公民民族信息的行為,在一些法治比較發(fā)達的多民族國家是受法律不同程度限制的,其中有的國家完全禁止采集公民的民族信息。采集公民民族信息的主要用途是根據(jù)民族對公民進行分類并差別對待。無限制地采集公民民族信息并差別對待,有違法律面前人人平等的憲法原則,對國家統(tǒng)一和民族團結(jié)也弊多利少。中國平衡發(fā)展需要正視區(qū)域差異,淡化民族差異。依據(jù)憲法有關(guān)規(guī)定和精神采取立法措施限制采集公民民族信息,十分必要。
[Abstract]:Apart from the principle of equality enshrined in the Constitution, our laws and regulations do not impose any specific restrictions on the collection and use of the national information of citizens. Ethnic information is often required to be filled in. Reassessing the advantages and disadvantages of the existing system of ethnic identification and information collection is the basis for reforming the current legal system of ethnic relations. In some multi-ethnic countries where the rule of law is more developed, it is limited to varying degrees by law. In some of these countries, the collection of national information on citizens is totally prohibited. The main purpose of collecting information on ethnic groups of citizens is to classify and treat them differently according to their nationalities. It violates the constitutional principle of equality before the law and does more harm than good to national unity and national unity. China's balanced development needs to face up to regional differences. It is necessary to adopt legislative measures to restrict the collection of national information according to the relevant provisions and spirit of the Constitution.
【作者單位】： 上海交通大學凱原法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金2014年重大課題項目“人民代表大會制度理論創(chuàng)新研究”(項目編號:14ZDAO14)的中期成果
【分類號】：D921

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 ;前進中的蘇博泰克——中國信息化建設(shè)中的生力軍[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1568288