論債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的確立
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-24 15:01
【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行救濟制度通說可被細分為實體性執(zhí)行救濟制度和程序性執(zhí)行救濟制度,債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴乃是實體性執(zhí)行救濟制度中的重點,而實體性救濟制度又是民事執(zhí)行救濟制度不可或缺的部分,由此可見債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴對于民事執(zhí)行救濟制度而言是非常重要的一個組成環(huán)節(jié)。民事訴訟法經過2007年和2012年的兩次修改后,執(zhí)行異議之訴制度在我國立法上得到確立并日趨完善,但是其從屬程序的不完善,例如債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的缺失,使的我國執(zhí)行異議之訴制度略顯殘缺,實在是一大憾事。債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴平等對待執(zhí)行程序中的債權人和債務人,可以實現(xiàn)“法律面前人人平等”這一原則,也可通過給予債務人針對執(zhí)行名義所依據的權利的訴權來保護債務人的實體權益。債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的確立也有利于進一步緩解我國當前司法實踐中“執(zhí)行難”和“執(zhí)行亂”等與執(zhí)行相關的頑固問題,為債務人在執(zhí)行中的合理訴求提供正規(guī)的解決渠道,公平的保護債權人與債務人的合法權益,有利于平衡當事人的權益,維護社會的長治久安。本文主要由四部分組成。第一部分是關于債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴這項制度的概述,概述各國關于此訴概念的描述,總結債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的特征。并將與之相近的執(zhí)行異議、案外人執(zhí)行異議之訴等概念進行區(qū)分。第二部分是通過我國目前的執(zhí)行救濟立法現(xiàn)狀,來分析我國現(xiàn)行執(zhí)行救濟體系的缺陷。探究我國債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴缺失的原因。并對確立債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的理論和實踐意義進行詳細闡述。第三部分主要研究債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的性質和程序定位。通過對學界關于此訴性質的主流學說的剖析,進而對我國的債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的性質和程序進行定位。第四部分主要是對債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴的程序構造進行設想。參照國外的立法和實務經驗,在我國實務的基礎之上,構建適合我國國情的債務人執(zhí)行異議之訴程序。
[Abstract]:The civil execution relief system can be divided into the entity execution relief system and the procedural execution relief system, the action of the debtor to implement the objection is the key in the entity execution relief system, and the entity relief system is an integral part of the civil implementation relief system, It can be seen that the action of the debtor's execution objection is a very important component in the civil implementation of the relief system. After the two amendments of the Civil Procedure Law in 2007 and 2012, the system of the complaint of the implementation of the objection has been established and perfected in our country's legislation, but the imperfect of its subordinate procedure, such as the loss of the debtor's complaint of the execution of the objection, makes the system of the case of the objection to the execution of the objection to be slightly incomplete. It's a big deal. In the case of the debtor's equal treatment of the creditor and the debtor in the executive proceedings, the principle of "Everyone is equal before the law" can be realized, and the debtor's entity's rights and interests can be protected by giving the debtor the right to enforce the right. The establishment of the challenge of the debtor's execution also helps to further alleviate the stubborn problems related to the implementation of the "Difficult to execute" and the "to carry out a mess" in the current judicial practice in China, provide a formal settlement channel for the debtor's reasonable demands in the implementation, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the debtor, It is beneficial to balance the interests of the parties and maintain the long-term stability of the society. This paper is mainly composed of four parts. The first part is an overview of the system of the debtor's objection to the implementation of the objection, and provides an overview of the description of the concept of the claim and the characteristics of the debtor's action to implement the objection. And the concept of the execution objection, the case of an outsider to execute the objection, and the like is distinguished. The second part is to analyze the defects of the existing relief system in our country through the present situation of the current implementation of the relief legislation in our country. To explore the reason why the debtor of our country is missing the challenge. In this paper, the theory and practical significance of the lawsuit of the debtor's enforcement of the objection are set forth in detail. The third part mainly studies the nature and procedure of the action of the debtor. Through the analysis of the mainstream theory of the nature of the lawsuit in the academic circle, the author further analyzes the nature and procedure of the challenge of the debtor in our country. The fourth part is the idea of the procedure structure of the lawsuit against the debtor. With reference to the foreign legislative and practical experience, on the basis of our country's practice, it is necessary to construct the lawsuit procedure of the debtor that is suitable for the situation of our country.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2505149
[Abstract]:The civil execution relief system can be divided into the entity execution relief system and the procedural execution relief system, the action of the debtor to implement the objection is the key in the entity execution relief system, and the entity relief system is an integral part of the civil implementation relief system, It can be seen that the action of the debtor's execution objection is a very important component in the civil implementation of the relief system. After the two amendments of the Civil Procedure Law in 2007 and 2012, the system of the complaint of the implementation of the objection has been established and perfected in our country's legislation, but the imperfect of its subordinate procedure, such as the loss of the debtor's complaint of the execution of the objection, makes the system of the case of the objection to the execution of the objection to be slightly incomplete. It's a big deal. In the case of the debtor's equal treatment of the creditor and the debtor in the executive proceedings, the principle of "Everyone is equal before the law" can be realized, and the debtor's entity's rights and interests can be protected by giving the debtor the right to enforce the right. The establishment of the challenge of the debtor's execution also helps to further alleviate the stubborn problems related to the implementation of the "Difficult to execute" and the "to carry out a mess" in the current judicial practice in China, provide a formal settlement channel for the debtor's reasonable demands in the implementation, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the creditor and the debtor, It is beneficial to balance the interests of the parties and maintain the long-term stability of the society. This paper is mainly composed of four parts. The first part is an overview of the system of the debtor's objection to the implementation of the objection, and provides an overview of the description of the concept of the claim and the characteristics of the debtor's action to implement the objection. And the concept of the execution objection, the case of an outsider to execute the objection, and the like is distinguished. The second part is to analyze the defects of the existing relief system in our country through the present situation of the current implementation of the relief legislation in our country. To explore the reason why the debtor of our country is missing the challenge. In this paper, the theory and practical significance of the lawsuit of the debtor's enforcement of the objection are set forth in detail. The third part mainly studies the nature and procedure of the action of the debtor. Through the analysis of the mainstream theory of the nature of the lawsuit in the academic circle, the author further analyzes the nature and procedure of the challenge of the debtor in our country. The fourth part is the idea of the procedure structure of the lawsuit against the debtor. With reference to the foreign legislative and practical experience, on the basis of our country's practice, it is necessary to construct the lawsuit procedure of the debtor that is suitable for the situation of our country.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 丁寶同;;執(zhí)行異議之訴:比較法視野下的譜系解讀[J];比較法研究;2015年04期
2 丁寶同;;實體性執(zhí)行異議程序之比較研究與立法完善[J];朝陽法律評論;2014年01期
3 傅賢國;;“第三人撤銷訴訟”抑或“訴訟第三人異議之訴”——基于我國《民訴法》第56條第3款的分析[J];法學評論;2013年05期
4 周安平;;涉訴輿論的面相與本相:十大經典案例分析[J];中國法學;2013年01期
5 盧君;馬登科;;民事執(zhí)行當事人變動的程序完善[J];法律適用;2013年01期
6 趙秀舉;;論民事執(zhí)行救濟兼論第三人執(zhí)行異議之訴的悖論與困境[J];中外法學;2012年04期
7 王娣;;我國民事訴訟法應確立“債務人異議之訴”[J];政法論壇;2012年01期
8 王娣;孫凌岳;;論債務人異議之訴[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2011年03期
9 韓波;;論執(zhí)行異議之訴中的“利害關系人”[J];中國政法大學學報;2011年03期
10 肖建國;;中國民事執(zhí)行立法的模式選擇[J];當代法學;2011年01期
，本文編號：2505149
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2505149.html
