【摘要】：“刑民交叉”是指一個(gè)法律事實(shí)同時(shí)侵犯刑事法律關(guān)系和民事法律關(guān)系的行為，而這種現(xiàn)象在經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件中尤其常見，經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪中的“刑民交叉”是司法實(shí)踐中經(jīng)常遇見且十分容易混淆的現(xiàn)象。可以說，刑民互涉案件司法處理已成為一個(gè)理論熱點(diǎn)。對(duì)于此類刑民互涉案件，理論界意見不一，爭(zhēng)議頗大；由于法律規(guī)定過于原則，缺乏操作性,由此造成實(shí)踐中執(zhí)法、司法部門和案件當(dāng)事人理解上存在較大的差異，法律適用中沖突和矛盾不斷，降低了辦案效率，提高了辦案成本，客觀上影響了案件的公正處理。如何正確處理刑民互涉案件，實(shí)現(xiàn)打擊犯罪與救濟(jì)當(dāng)事人之間的協(xié)調(diào)，是一個(gè)近年來我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的亟待解決的問題。 本文在2009年至2012年相關(guān)統(tǒng)計(jì)資料的基礎(chǔ)上，深入分析偵辦經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件中遇到的刑民交叉案件及特點(diǎn)、對(duì)當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪中的“先刑后民”處理模式進(jìn)行探討，并有針對(duì)性地提出對(duì)策。本文主要涉及以下四個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容： 第一部分：經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件“刑民交叉”及其引發(fā)的程序難題。著重闡明本文的研究對(duì)象、存在的難題和研究的意義，并對(duì)目前我國(guó)“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件呈多發(fā)狀態(tài)，隨之引起的是程序上和實(shí)體上的諸多難題進(jìn)行介紹。 第二部分：經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件“先刑后民”處理模式的應(yīng)用及其合理性。探討了經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件“先刑后民”模式的形成原因，，認(rèn)為“先刑后民”模式的形成，既有傳統(tǒng)刑民合一因素，也與重刑輕民的司法傳統(tǒng)和刑法作為工具的傳統(tǒng)思維有關(guān)系。同時(shí)，論文還對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件“先刑后民”處理模式存在的淵源、在當(dāng)代司法中的地位以及對(duì)“先刑后民”模式體現(xiàn)的合理性進(jìn)行探討。 第三部分：經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件“先刑后民”處理模式的法理反思。論文提出，在實(shí)踐意義上而言，處理“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件時(shí)，單純采取“先刑后民”處理模式的司法缺陷，造成民事案件立案難、民事判決既判力受損、成為某些不法行為人利用的工具；在理論層面上，“先刑后民”處理模式也有以下理論缺陷：“先刑后民”處理模式缺乏法律根據(jù)，且隱含對(duì)私權(quán)的漠視和延續(xù)重刑輕民的傳統(tǒng)思維，人為將刑民程序?qū)α�，有損公平與正義這一法律最高宗旨。 第四部分：經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件程序處理模式的重構(gòu)。首先比較了“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件幾種處理模式，指出要將現(xiàn)行的“先刑后民”模式限制在合理的范圍內(nèi)，同時(shí)應(yīng)在實(shí)體上盡快建立“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件類型化分選機(jī)制和在程序上公檢法三家應(yīng)盡快理順“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件的移送協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制，從制度上完善“刑民交叉”經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件相關(guān)民事和刑事部分的程序規(guī)定等。
[Abstract]:"cross-cutting of the people of the" refers to the fact that a legal fact violates the relationship of criminal law and civil law at the same time, and this phenomenon is especially common in economic crime cases. The "cross-cutting of the people of the" in economic crime is often found in the judicial practice and is very easy to be confused. It can be said that the judicial processing of the case of the criminal and the people has become a theoretical hot point. In the case of such cases, the opinions of the theoretical circles are different and the dispute is large; due to the too principle of the law and the lack of the operability, the law enforcement, the judiciary and the case parties understand that there is a great difference in the understanding of the law, the conflict and the contradiction in the application of the law, the improvement of the handling efficiency, the improvement of the cost of handling the case, and the objective influence on the public-right treatment of the case. How to deal with the case of the criminal and the people and realize the coordination between the crime and the relief parties is a problem to be solved urgently in the judicial practice in China in recent years. On the basis of the relevant statistics from 2009 to 2012, this paper, in-depth analysis of the cross-case and characteristics of the criminal in the economic crime of the investigation, discusses the "the post-execution of the people" processing model in the current economic crime, and puts forward some countermeasures. The article mainly deals with the following four aspects: The first part: The first part: The cross of the people of the economic crime and the procedural difficulties that have been raised. The research object, the problems and the significance of the research are given. The second part: The application of the "the post-execution of the people" of the "the post-execution of the people" of economic crime and its rationality. The reason of the "the post-execution of the people" of the "the post-execution of the people" pattern of economic crime is discussed. The formation of the "the post-execution of the people" pattern is considered as the factor of the combination of the traditional punishment and the traditional thought of the criminal law as a tool. In the third part, the author puts forward that, in the sense of practice, when dealing with the "economic crime cases", the article puts forward that, in the sense of practice, when dealing with the" economic crime cases", the "people" in the process of "the post-execution of the people" are only used to deal with the judicial defects of the mode, which causes the case of civil cases to be difficult, and the civil judgment is judged to be damaged and becomes a tool to be used by some wrongdoers. At the theoretical level, the "post-punishment" process model also has the following theoretical defects: the "people" treatment mode lacks the legal basis, and the traditional thinking of ignoring and continuing the severe punishment of the people is the opposite of the criminal procedure, which is detrimental to the fairness and justice. The fourth part: The reconstruction of the processing mode of the economic crime cases. The first part compares several treatment modes of the "cross-cutting of the people of the" economic crime cases, points out that the existing "the post-execution of the people" model is limited to a reasonable range, and the type of "cross-cutting of the people of the" economic crimes type sorting mechanism should be established as soon as possible, and the transfer coordination mechanism of the "cross-cutting of the people of the" economic crime cases should be straightened as soon as possible, and the related civil and punishment of the "cross-cutting of the people of the" economic crime cases should be improved from the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙子強(qiáng);袁登明;;刑民交叉案件的訴訟模式問題研究[J];法律適用;2009年02期

2 江偉;林辛建;孫燕;;詐騙類案件中刑民交叉問題的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2009年02期

3 江偉,范躍如;刑民交叉案件處理機(jī)制研究[J];法商研究;2005年04期

4 朱軍;汪強(qiáng);相明;;刑民交叉案件處理機(jī)制的重新構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年25期

5 宋陽;;論偵查程序中“刑民交叉”案件的處理[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

6 傅賢國(guó);;對(duì)刑民交叉案件有關(guān)司法解釋的理解——兼論刑民交叉案件的處理模式[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年03期

7 楊濤;刑事附帶民事訴訟制度構(gòu)建的再思考[J];人民檢察;2003年08期

8 魏東;鐘凱;;論刑民交叉及其關(guān)涉問題[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

9 劉森;張松;;試論刑民交叉案件的“先刑后民”審理模式[J];人民司法;2012年05期

10 吳喜梅;;刑民交叉案件處理模式研究[J];現(xiàn)代交際;2011年10期

本文編號(hào)：2482831