【摘要】：自認的效力是指在民事訴訟過程中，經(jīng)當事人承認的于己不利的事實，無需對方當事人舉證，也無需法院依職權(quán)調(diào)查其真實性就能對當事人和法院產(chǎn)生拘束力，，限制爭執(zhí)及舉證的范圍。承認自認的效力是自認人自由意志、充分表達自己意愿和自由處分自己權(quán)利的體現(xiàn)，有助于弱化法官職權(quán)，強化當事人主體地位，促進我國民事訴訟模式由職權(quán)主義向當事人主義轉(zhuǎn)變；也有利于簡化訴訟程序，提高訴訟效率，充分利用有限的司法資源。但依據(jù)現(xiàn)有法律運用自認效力規(guī)則會產(chǎn)生一系列問題，需對相關(guān)規(guī)則進行完善。民事訴訟過程中，由于自認在法定情形下可以被撤銷的，會導致筆錄前后不一致，因此，可以對當事人自認事實單獨制成筆錄，將它與一般的庭審筆錄區(qū)分開來。最高人民法院《證據(jù)規(guī)定》第八條第四款、第七十四條對自認撤銷的規(guī)定存在不一致，這會導致適用法律的不確定性，容易引起混亂，需要立法統(tǒng)一其規(guī)定。我國更傾向職權(quán)主義模式的民事訴訟模式影響自認效力的發(fā)揮，而當事人主義模式是自認規(guī)則存在的理想環(huán)境，所以要從根本上轉(zhuǎn)變訴訟模式。
[Abstract]:The effect of self-admission means that in the course of civil litigation, the facts admitted by the parties against themselves do not need to be proved by the other party, nor is it necessary for the court to investigate its authenticity ex officio so as to have a binding force on the parties and the court. Limit the scope of disputes and proof. Recognition of the effect of self-admission is the embodiment of the free will of the self-confessed person, the full expression of his will and the free disposition of his rights, which helps to weaken the power of the judge and strengthen the subject position of the parties concerned. To promote the transformation of civil litigation mode from functional doctrine to party doctrine in our country; It is also beneficial to simplify the procedure, improve the efficiency of litigation and make full use of limited judicial resources. However, according to the existing laws, there will be a series of problems in the application of the self-admission effect rules, which need to be perfected. In the process of civil litigation, because the admission can be revoked under the legal circumstances, it will cause the inconsistency of the transcript. Therefore, the self-confessed facts of the litigants can be made into separate transcripts, which can be distinguished from the ordinary court transcripts. There are inconsistencies in Article 8, paragraph 4, and Article 74 of the Supreme people's Court on the withdrawal of self-admission, which will lead to uncertainty in the application of the law and easily lead to confusion, requiring legislation to unify its provisions. In our country, the mode of civil litigation, which is more inclined to the mode of professional doctrine, affects the exertion of self-admission, and the adversarial model is the ideal environment for the existence of self-admission rules, so it is necessary to fundamentally change the mode of litigation.
【學位授予單位】：暨南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳錦紅;對民事訴訟自認規(guī)則的思考[J];法學雜志;2005年01期

2 陳錦紅;論民事訴訟自認規(guī)則的完善[J];華東政法學院學報;2004年06期

3 廖永安;胡軍輝;;試論民事訴訟中的擬制自認[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2007年04期

4 劉學在;辯論主義的根據(jù)[J];法學研究;2005年04期

5 楊秀清;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)訴訟中自認的限制性規(guī)則[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2011年03期

本文編號：2456023