行政與民事交叉案件處理之研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-30 14:35
【摘要】：行政訴訟與民事訴訟之間既有密切的聯(lián)系,又有顯著的區(qū)別。在審判實踐中,目前行政與民事交叉案件數(shù)量呈明顯上升趨勢,對于該類案件如何審理、應(yīng)遵循怎樣的處理原則,現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)定尚不完善。理論上的探討、司法實踐中的操作也各有不同。在審理中誤導(dǎo)當(dāng)事人的情況時有發(fā)生,引起當(dāng)事人對法院、法官的誤解或不信任,也不利于樹立法律、法院的權(quán)威。本文針對此問題進(jìn)行研究,在分析行民交叉案件概念、特征和類型的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合本國理論界的研究和實踐中的做法,對比借鑒域外經(jīng)驗,提出了完善我國行民交叉案件審理模式的思路和構(gòu)想。 本文共分為研究背景、正文四章和結(jié)語。研究背景從當(dāng)事人、審判實務(wù)界和理論界遇到的困惑入手,闡明了行民交叉案件已成為司法實踐中的一大難題,引出本文選題的理由與研究的意義。第一章分析了行民交叉案件的概念、特征與成因,并根據(jù)行政行為的種類和不同行政行為對民事爭議所起的作用不同來對行民交叉案件進(jìn)行了類型劃分,是全文的理論起點。第二章陳述了我國的立法現(xiàn)狀,概括介紹了我國目前理論界和實踐中關(guān)于行民交叉案件審理模式的分歧,并對其進(jìn)行了簡要評析,然后針對我國存在的難題借鑒分析了域外的處理經(jīng)驗。第三章和第四章是重點,本文在進(jìn)行前述論述的基礎(chǔ)上提出了構(gòu)建審理行民交叉案件的思路和構(gòu)想,本文不贊成一刀切的做法,而是根據(jù)案件類型的不同給出了不同的審理模式,同時輔以采取立案導(dǎo)引和加強(qiáng)審限管理等完善措施,以求在應(yīng)對紛多繁雜的行民交叉案件時更具有操作性和實用性。結(jié)語則是對本文的整體總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:There is not only a close connection between administrative litigation and civil action, but also a significant difference. In the trial practice, the number of administrative and civil cross-cases is obviously increasing. The current legislation is not perfect as to how to deal with such cases and what principles should be followed to deal with them. Theoretically, the operation in judicial practice is different. Mislead the parties in the trial often occurs, causing the parties to the court, the judge's misunderstanding or mistrust, also is not conducive to the establishment of the law, the authority of the court. On the basis of analyzing the concept, characteristics and types of cross-border cases, and combining with the research and practice of domestic theoretical circles, this paper compares and draws lessons from the experience outside the territory. This paper puts forward the ideas and ideas of perfecting the trial mode of cross-border cases between people and people in our country. This article is divided into the research background, the text four chapters and the conclusion. The research background starts with the confusion encountered by the litigants, judicial practitioners and theorists, clarifies that the cross-case between people and people has become a major problem in judicial practice, and leads to the reasons for choosing this topic and the significance of the study. The first chapter analyzes the concept, characteristics and causes of cross-disciplinary cases, and divides the types of cross-cases according to the types of administrative acts and the different roles of different administrative acts on civil disputes, which is the theoretical starting point of the full text. The second chapter states the current situation of legislation in our country, summarizes the differences between the theory circle and the practice on the trial mode of cross-border cases, and makes a brief analysis of it. Then according to the problems existing in our country, the experience of dealing with the problems outside the domain is analyzed. The third and fourth chapters are the focal points. On the basis of the above-mentioned discussion, this paper puts forward the ideas and ideas of constructing the trial of cross-cutting cases between the people and the people, and this article does not agree with the one-size-fits-all approach. However, according to the different types of cases, different trial modes are given, and at the same time, some perfect measures are adopted, such as guiding the filing of cases and strengthening the management of trial limits, in order to be more operational and practical in dealing with the numerous and complicated cases between people and people. The conclusion is the overall summary of this article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3;D925.1
本文編號：2450172
[Abstract]:There is not only a close connection between administrative litigation and civil action, but also a significant difference. In the trial practice, the number of administrative and civil cross-cases is obviously increasing. The current legislation is not perfect as to how to deal with such cases and what principles should be followed to deal with them. Theoretically, the operation in judicial practice is different. Mislead the parties in the trial often occurs, causing the parties to the court, the judge's misunderstanding or mistrust, also is not conducive to the establishment of the law, the authority of the court. On the basis of analyzing the concept, characteristics and types of cross-border cases, and combining with the research and practice of domestic theoretical circles, this paper compares and draws lessons from the experience outside the territory. This paper puts forward the ideas and ideas of perfecting the trial mode of cross-border cases between people and people in our country. This article is divided into the research background, the text four chapters and the conclusion. The research background starts with the confusion encountered by the litigants, judicial practitioners and theorists, clarifies that the cross-case between people and people has become a major problem in judicial practice, and leads to the reasons for choosing this topic and the significance of the study. The first chapter analyzes the concept, characteristics and causes of cross-disciplinary cases, and divides the types of cross-cases according to the types of administrative acts and the different roles of different administrative acts on civil disputes, which is the theoretical starting point of the full text. The second chapter states the current situation of legislation in our country, summarizes the differences between the theory circle and the practice on the trial mode of cross-border cases, and makes a brief analysis of it. Then according to the problems existing in our country, the experience of dealing with the problems outside the domain is analyzed. The third and fourth chapters are the focal points. On the basis of the above-mentioned discussion, this paper puts forward the ideas and ideas of constructing the trial of cross-cutting cases between the people and the people, and this article does not agree with the one-size-fits-all approach. However, according to the different types of cases, different trial modes are given, and at the same time, some perfect measures are adopted, such as guiding the filing of cases and strengthening the management of trial limits, in order to be more operational and practical in dealing with the numerous and complicated cases between people and people. The conclusion is the overall summary of this article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3;D925.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 章劍生;;尋求行政訴訟和解在法律規(guī)范上的可能性——法律解釋方法之視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期
2 薛剛凌;處理行政、民事爭議重合案件的程序探討[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1998年06期
3 吳偕林;;民事、行政救濟(jì)程序交叉問題之解決[J];法律適用;2007年07期
4 楊建順;;行政、民事爭議交叉案件審理機(jī)制的困境與對策[J];法律適用;2009年05期
5 馬懷德,張紅;行政爭議與民事爭議的交織與處理[J];法商研究;2003年04期
6 楊建順;;日本行政法及行政法學(xué)的歷史發(fā)展及其特色[J];法學(xué)家;1998年04期
7 黃學(xué)賢;;行民交叉案件處理之探究[J];法學(xué);2009年08期
8 梁榕;;行政爭議與民事爭議交織案件的訴訟問題研究[J];法制與社會;2011年15期
9 王勇;;民事與行政交叉案件的審理模式探究[J];法制與社會;2011年21期
10 郭明龍;;附帶訴訟制度構(gòu)建質(zhì)疑——兼論行政、民事糾紛交織案件的處理[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年02期
，本文編號：2450172
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2450172.html
最近更新
教材專著
