【摘要】：在黨的十八屆三中全會精神指引下,完善我國刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制是當前法學領域研究的重要課題,也是新一輪司法改革的必然要求。目前的司法結構下,刑事錯案的發(fā)現(xiàn)往往源于“真兇出現(xiàn)”或者“死者復活”這種極其偶然的因素。從司法實踐情況來看,我國并沒有形成成熟的刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制。錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)工作長期以來面臨現(xiàn)實困境,在效率和工作機制等方面存在諸多缺陷,導致現(xiàn)行機制運行不暢,實踐效果差強人意,亟待加以改革和完善。因此,就我國刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制進行更深入的專項研究迫在眉睫。 本文通過對刑事錯案的概念進行辨析,同時討論有關刑事錯案的界定標準與表現(xiàn)形式,進一步厘清刑事錯案的認定問題。著重從我國刑事申訴、抗訴、涉法涉訴信訪和媒體揭露等多個層面展開對我國現(xiàn)行刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制的反思,分析出該機制運行的癥結所在。通過對域外地區(qū)民間團體和官方機構在錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)問題上制度構建和實踐運作研究,梳理域外刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)的救濟經驗,希望對完善我國刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制有所啟示。在立足我國司法實踐的基礎上,為我國刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制解決部分提供具有可操作性的解決方案。在完善現(xiàn)有發(fā)現(xiàn)機制的基礎上,有針對性地嘗試新的制度和做法,以拓寬錯案的發(fā)現(xiàn)渠道和途徑,力求建立一種制度化、規(guī)范化、長效化以及科學化的刑事錯案發(fā)現(xiàn)機制,使錯案的發(fā)現(xiàn)從偶然走向必然。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the spirit of the third Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, perfecting the discovery mechanism of criminal error cases in our country is an important subject in the field of law research at present, and it is also the inevitable requirement of a new round of judicial reform. Under the current judicial structure, the discovery of criminal error cases is often due to "the presence of the real perpetrator" or "the resurrection of the dead", which is an extremely accidental factor. From the point of view of judicial practice, China has not formed a mature criminal error case discovery mechanism. There are many defects in efficiency and working mechanism for a long time, which lead to the poor operation of the current mechanism and the poor practical effect. It is urgent to reform and perfect it. Therefore, it is urgent to carry out a more in-depth research on the mechanism of criminal error detection in our country. This paper analyzes the concept of criminal error case, discusses the definition standard and manifestation of criminal error case, and further clarifies the identification of criminal error case. This paper focuses on the reflection on the current criminal error case discovery mechanism in our country from the aspects of criminal appeal, protest, legal-related complaint, letter and visit, and media disclosure, and analyzes the crux of the operation of this mechanism. Through the research on the system construction and practice operation of the civil organizations and official organizations in the extraterritorial areas on the problem of finding wrong cases, the author tries to sort out the relief experience of the discovery of criminal miscases outside the territory, and hopes to enlighten the improvement of the discovery mechanism of criminal error cases in our country. On the basis of the judicial practice of our country, this paper provides a feasible solution for the mechanism of finding criminal error cases in our country. On the basis of perfecting the existing discovery mechanism, we should try new systems and practices in order to widen the channels and ways of finding wrong cases, and strive to establish an institutionalized, standardized, long-term and scientific mechanism for discovering criminal miscases. Make the discovery of the wrong case from chance to necessity.
【學位授予單位】：北京交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 干紅光;葉林達;;檢察機關刑事審判監(jiān)督實踐窘境及其突圍[J];中國司法;2008年03期

2 張敏;戴娟;;困惑與出路:轉型期法院涉訴信訪制度的理性探究[J];法律適用;2009年06期

3 張衛(wèi)平;論我國法院體制的非行政化——法院體制改革的一種基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2000年03期

4 李建國;金志鋒;;我國二審刑事抗訴制度之重構淺探[J];法學雜志;2007年05期

5 何家弘;;刑事庭審虛化的實證研究[J];法學家;2011年06期

6 萬毅;歷史與現(xiàn)實交困中的案件請示制度[J];法學;2005年02期

7 謝佑平;防止冤假錯案,有賴于健全的刑事程序法[J];法學;2005年05期

8 周永坤;錯案追究制與法治國家建設——一個法社會學的思考[J];法學;1997年09期

9 陳學權;;發(fā)現(xiàn)冤案的新方法——美國定罪后DNA檢測立法及啟示[J];當代法學;2013年05期

10 周永坤;;信訪潮與中國糾紛解決機制的路徑選擇[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年01期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 李春剛;刑事錯案基本問題研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

，

本文編號：2449147