發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-06 17:31

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及，不僅推動(dòng)了社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，而且為人們的日常生活帶來方便快捷。凡事無絕對(duì)，利弊并存，伴之而來的網(wǎng)絡(luò)問題也逐漸凸顯。目前，網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件呈高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)，這給司法界帶來不少的困擾。由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間的虛擬性，以地域?yàn)榛A(chǔ)的傳統(tǒng)管轄理論已經(jīng)無法滿足網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的需求。關(guān)于如何有效的解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)已經(jīng)成為非常迫切而且非常棘手的問題，學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)此仁者見仁智者見智，始終未能形成一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的觀點(diǎn)。在司法實(shí)踐中我們面臨的重要問題便是：以地域?yàn)榛A(chǔ)的傳統(tǒng)管轄規(guī)則是否仍然適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件？如何在現(xiàn)有的法律秩序中修正、更新和補(bǔ)充既有規(guī)則，以適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件？本文以網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的表現(xiàn)形式以及其與一般侵權(quán)之間的區(qū)別為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)給傳統(tǒng)管轄理論帶來的沖擊，并對(duì)一些主流觀點(diǎn)和發(fā)達(dá)國家的司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行理論研究和實(shí)證分析，最后總結(jié)出傳統(tǒng)地域管轄規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件中的變更與取舍，同時(shí)為我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)地域管轄制度的改進(jìn)與完善提出可行性的、建設(shè)性的意見。 全文共分為四章： 第一章是緒論，主要講述了本文的選題背景以及意義，對(duì)目前研究現(xiàn)狀的分析和對(duì)本文的研究思路及方法。從我國目前有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的立法來觀察，其不足以滿足網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的需求。 第二章從網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的表現(xiàn)形式以及其與一般侵權(quán)之間的區(qū)別出發(fā)，，重點(diǎn)分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)給以地域?yàn)榛A(chǔ)的傳統(tǒng)管轄理論帶來的沖擊，主要表現(xiàn)為：對(duì)國家司法管轄權(quán)的否定、導(dǎo)致侵權(quán)行為地難以確定、導(dǎo)致“原告就被告”理論的適用困境以及導(dǎo)致當(dāng)事人濫用擇地訴訟，透過現(xiàn)象深挖其本質(zhì)問題，從而為后文對(duì)策的提出奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 第三章重點(diǎn)闡述了法學(xué)界有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件地域管轄的新理論，主要包括：新主權(quán)理論、管轄權(quán)相對(duì)論、技術(shù)優(yōu)先管轄等理論觀點(diǎn)，通過研究分析并指出其合理與不合理之處。同時(shí)還論述了以美國為代表的發(fā)達(dá)國家有關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的司法實(shí)踐，通過分析論證學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒其合理的地方。 第四章闡述作者關(guān)于我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件地域管轄的探索，首先要明確我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)司法管轄權(quán)的原則，然后在此基礎(chǔ)之上對(duì)我國在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)問題提出了自己的主張。
[Abstract]:The popularization of Internet not only promotes the rapid development of social economy, but also brings convenience to people's daily life. Everything has no absolute, advantages and disadvantages coexist, accompanied by the network problems are also gradually highlighted. At present, there is a high incidence of network infringement cases, which brings a lot of trouble to the judicial circles. Because of the virtual nature of cyberspace, the traditional jurisdiction theory based on region can not meet the demand of network infringement cases. How to effectively solve the network infringement has become a very urgent and very difficult problem, the academic community has not formed a unified point of view. The important question we face in judicial practice is: is the traditional jurisdiction rule based on geographical basis still applicable to network infringement cases? How to amend, update and supplement existing rules in the existing legal order to apply to network infringement cases? Taking the form of network infringement and the difference between it and general tort as the starting point, this paper analyzes the impact of network infringement on traditional jurisdictional theory. It also makes theoretical research and empirical analysis on some mainstream views and judicial practice in developed countries. Finally, it sums up the changes and choices of traditional regional jurisdiction rules in network tort cases. At the same time, it puts forward feasible and constructive suggestions for the improvement and perfection of our country's network tort jurisdiction system. The full text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the introduction, which mainly describes the background and significance of this topic, the analysis of the current research situation and the research ideas and methods of this paper. From the current legislation on network infringement in China, it is not enough to meet the needs of network infringement cases. The second chapter starts from the manifestation of network infringement and the difference between it and general tort, and analyzes the impact of network infringement on the traditional jurisdiction theory based on region, mainly as follows: the negation of national judicial jurisdiction, the second chapter focuses on the analysis of the impact of network infringement on traditional jurisdiction theory based on region. It leads to the difficulty of applying the theory of "plaintiff to defendant" and the abuse of the litigation of choosing land by the party concerned, so as to dig out its essential problems through the phenomenon, so as to lay a foundation for the proposal of the later countermeasures. The third chapter focuses on the new theories of regional jurisdiction of network infringement cases in the field of law, including: the theory of new sovereignty, the relativity of jurisdiction, the technical priority jurisdiction, and so on, and points out its rationality and irrationality through the research and analysis. At the same time, it also discusses the judicial practice of network infringement cases in developed countries represented by the United States, through the analysis and demonstration to learn and learn from its reasonable place. The fourth chapter expounds the author's exploration on the regional jurisdiction of network infringement cases in our country, firstly, it is necessary to clarify the principle of our country's network tort jurisdiction, and then on this basis, the author puts forward his own opinion on the issue of our country's jurisdiction over network infringement cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 周強(qiáng);;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的侵權(quán)責(zé)任——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條第2款、第3款為中心[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 卓翔;對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件的司法管轄權(quán)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年03期

3 王德全;試論Internet案件的司法管轄權(quán)[J];中外法學(xué);1998年02期

4 李建勛;;現(xiàn)代傳媒網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品的保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代傳播(中國傳媒大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2007年03期

5 胡充寒;美國產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法概析[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年03期

6 楊立新,王中合;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的物權(quán)屬性及其基本規(guī)則[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

7 李賀杰;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件地域管轄權(quán)的確定[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

本文編號(hào)：2435746