【摘要】：有關(guān)民事預(yù)備合并之訴的研究在我國的民事訴訟領(lǐng)域尚不十分廣泛,一部分民事法學(xué)研究者認(rèn)為民事預(yù)備合并之訴只是一個純理論性問題,其在現(xiàn)階段我國的司法實(shí)踐中可操作性也并不強(qiáng),所以對于其有關(guān)注和探討并不多見,周而復(fù)始,民事預(yù)備合并之訴似乎就被束之高閣,鮮有人會對其做比較系統(tǒng)的研究。但在德國、日本以及我國臺灣地區(qū)的民事訴訟研究中以及民事司法裁判中都能看見民事預(yù)備合并之訴的探討和運(yùn)用,究其原因,可以歸結(jié)為民事預(yù)備合并之訴對于民事訴訟的深刻影響和重大意義。從理論層面來說,民事預(yù)備合并之訴是符合民事訴訟法的內(nèi)在精神和基本原則的,對于訴訟主體或者是訴訟標(biāo)的的合并能夠充分體現(xiàn)民事訴訟的處分原則和當(dāng)事人的程序選擇權(quán)。從司法實(shí)踐的角度來說,民事預(yù)備合并之訴的合理規(guī)范運(yùn)用一方面能夠解決已經(jīng)在我國民事訴訟案件中存在的一些不能簡單的歸類為共同訴訟的問題,另一方面從宏觀角度概括預(yù)備合并之訴也具有提高訴訟效率、實(shí)現(xiàn)訴訟經(jīng)濟(jì)和維護(hù)司法裁判的統(tǒng)一的積極作用�；诿袷骂A(yù)備合并之訴的合法性以及重要意義,又考慮到我國民事訴訟領(lǐng)域的不斷改革和制度完善,本文立足于民事預(yù)備合并之訴的理論基礎(chǔ),對于預(yù)備合并之訴的研究論述從其概念和性質(zhì)界定入手,并且把預(yù)備合并之訴放在民事訴訟中訴的合并這一部分進(jìn)行分析說明,明確其中的主觀預(yù)備合并之訴和客觀預(yù)備合并之訴與共同訴訟之間的關(guān)系,分析出主觀預(yù)備合并之訴實(shí)際上在我國的司法實(shí)踐中是極有可能已經(jīng)存在的,只是在法律層面和理論層面不曾被認(rèn)可。闡述了與民事預(yù)備合并之訴相關(guān)的訴訟標(biāo)的理論、請求權(quán)競合問題以及訴權(quán)理論與預(yù)備合并之訴的重要關(guān)系,結(jié)合相關(guān)理論中對于預(yù)備合并之訴的分類,綜合我國臺灣地區(qū)和德日民事訴訟中對于民事預(yù)備合并之訴的研究理論,分別對主觀預(yù)備合并之訴和客觀預(yù)備合并之訴進(jìn)行了論述,從民事訴訟的目的、基本原則、民事司法實(shí)踐的訴訟效率以及主觀預(yù)備合并之訴和客觀預(yù)備合并之訴在民事司法實(shí)踐中的可利用性價值等角度分析了預(yù)備合并之訴的合法性、意義以及由不同訴訟標(biāo)的理論而對民事預(yù)備合并之訴產(chǎn)生的多方面多層次的影響,力圖對包括民事預(yù)備合并之訴的提出問題、管轄問題、上訴問題以及預(yù)備合并之訴中主位之訴與備位之訴之間的關(guān)系等一些有爭議而在民事預(yù)備合并之訴的研究中又必須明確的問題闡述了自己的認(rèn)識,以期能對我國的民事預(yù)備合并之訴的深入研究有所啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:The research on the litigation of civil preparatory merger is not very extensive in the field of civil litigation in our country. Some civil law researchers think that the litigation of civil preparatory merger is only a purely theoretical problem. Its maneuverability is also not strong in the judicial practice of our country at the present stage, so there is little attention and discussion about it. From time to time, the lawsuit of civil preparatory merger seems to be abandoned, and few people will do more systematic research on it. However, in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, we can see the exploration and application of civil preparatory merger in the study of civil litigation and civil judicial adjudication. It can be summed up as the profound influence and great significance of the suit of civil preparatory merger to the civil litigation. Theoretically speaking, the lawsuit of civil preparatory merger is in line with the inherent spirit and basic principles of the civil procedure law. The combination of the subject of action or the object of action can fully reflect the principle of disciplinary action and the right to choose the procedure of the parties. From the point of view of judicial practice, on the one hand, the rational and normative application of civil preparatory merger can solve some problems that can not be simply classified as joint litigation in civil litigation cases in our country. On the other hand, it can improve the efficiency of litigation, realize the economy of litigation and maintain the unity of judicial judgment. Based on the legitimacy and significance of the litigation of civil preparatory merger, and considering the continuous reform and perfection of the system in the field of civil litigation in our country, this paper is based on the theoretical basis of the litigation of civil preparatory merger. On the basis of the definition of the concept and nature of the lawsuit of the preparatory merger, the author analyzes and explains the part of the action of the preparatory merger in the part of the amalgamation of the civil action. This paper clarifies the relationship between the subjective preparatory merger and the objective preparatory merger and the joint litigation, and analyzes that the subjective preparatory merger is very likely to exist in the judicial practice of our country. Only in the legal and theoretical level has not been recognized. This paper expounds the theory of litigant object, the issue of competing claim and the important relationship between the theory of right of action and the lawsuit of preparatory merger, combining with the classification of the lawsuit of preparatory merger in the related theory. Based on the research theory of civil preparatory merger in Taiwan and Germany-Japan civil litigation, this paper discusses the subjective preparatory merger and the objective preparatory merger respectively, from the point of view of the purpose and the basic principle of civil litigation. The efficiency of litigation in civil judicial practice and the available value of subjective preparatory merger and objective preparatory merger in civil judicial practice are analyzed in this paper. The significance and the multi-level influence of different theories of litigation object on the lawsuit of civil preparatory merger try to raise the questions and jurisdictional problems of the litigation of civil preparatory merger, and try hard to put forward the question of the lawsuit of civil preparatory merger, and try to put forward the problem of jurisdiction. Some controversial issues, such as the relationship between the subject suit and the reserve lawsuit in the litigation of the preparatory merger, and so on, which must be made clear in the study of the litigation of the civil preparatory merger, have expounded their own understanding. In order to enlighten the in-depth study of the civil preparatory merger in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 范光群;;主觀預(yù)備合并之訴在臺灣地區(qū)的發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)家;1999年05期

2 劉田玉;預(yù)備合并之訴的合法性及其適用[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

3 姚曉霞,曲建軍;訴訟標(biāo)的與訴訟請求關(guān)系探析[J];遼寧商務(wù)職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

4 傅郁林;;再論民事訴訟立案程序的功能與結(jié)構(gòu)[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

5 朱興有,鄭斌鋒;訴的合并與訴訟請求的合并之界定[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年08期

，

本文編號：2431143